904 resultados para solid waste regionalization
Resumo:
"This publication (SW 897.8) was prepared by the Office of Solid Waste ... The listing for each Region is in a separate volume."
Resumo:
Includes bibliographical references.
Resumo:
" ... official record of the meetings ... held by the Office of Solid Waste Management Programs, December 2 (Newark, N.J.), December 4 (Rosemont, Ill.), December 9 (Houston), and December 11 (San Francisco)."
Resumo:
"These meetings were sponsored by EPA, Office of Solid Waste, and the proceedings (SW-26p)--are reproduced ... as transcribed by the official reporter, with handwritten corrections."
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"Printed: January 1988."
Resumo:
A compilation of reports submitted to the Illinois EPA by Illinois hazardous waste generators and hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities. Includes a brief discussion of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.
Resumo:
The IEPA is proud to sponsor these worthwhile programs around the state to help citizens safely rid their homes of unwanted pesticides, paints, automotive fluids and other household items that could pose a threat to our landfills, homes or environment, if disposed in a an unsafe environment.
Resumo:
"ILENR/RR-89/09."
Resumo:
"HWRIC RR-060."
Resumo:
Cover title.
Resumo:
"EPA form 8700-12"--Cover
Resumo:
Most of the pages of the photocopy, which is in double columns, represent approximately 2 pages of the original.
Resumo:
Many local authorities (LAs) are currently working to reduce both greenhouse gas emissions and the amount of municipal solid waste (MSW) sent to landfill. The recovery of energy from waste (EfW) can assist in meeting both of these objectives. The choice of an EfW policy combines spatial and non-spatial decisions which may be handled using Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). This paper addresses the impact of transporting MSW to EfW facilities, analysed as part of a larger decision support system designed to make an overall policy assessment of centralised (large-scale) and distributed (local-scale) approaches. Custom-written ArcMap extensions are used to compare centralised versus distributed approaches, using shortest-path routing based on expected road speed. Results are intersected with 1-kilometre grids and census geographies for meaningful maps of cumulative impact. Case studies are described for two counties in the United Kingdom (UK); Cornwall and Warwickshire. For both case study areas, centralised scenarios generate more traffic, fuel costs and emitted carbon per tonne of MSW processed.