O professor e seu desenvolvimento profissional: Superando a concepção do algoz incompetente

A crítica ao modelo de racionalidade técnica e a emergência da abordagem crítico-reflexiva possibilitaram o reconhecimento da importância do professor e seu desenvolvimento profissional como variável decisiva para a compreensão do fenômeno educativo. Apesar disso, no Brasil ainda persistem análises que explicitam os professores como eternos "bodes expiatórios", ao invés de compreender a "cultura docente em ação" e seu papel para a transformação da escola. Este trabalho procura mostrar, recorrendo a pesquisas realizadas pela autora e equipe de pesquisadores, a necessidade de conceber os professores como "gestores de dilemas" sujeitos de um fazer e um saber que precisam ser analisados à luz de seu desenvolvimento profissional, mediado pelas condições de trabalho, valores e contexto social. Tal concepção é decisiva para qualquer tentativa conseqüente de transformação da escola.

Do professor informante ao professor parceiro: Reflexões sobre o papel da universidade para o desenvolvimento profissional de professores e as mudanças na escola

Este trabalho advoga a idéia de que os relacionamentos colaborativos entre universidade e escolas de 1º e 2º graus representam alternativa metodológica privilegiada tanto para investigação, quanto para atuação sobre o desenvolvimento profissional de professores e suas condições de trabalho. Projetos de natureza coletiva, que aproximam a pesquisa da realidade a ser estudada, como a pesquisa-ação colaborativa, constituem exemplos muito positivos de parceria entre universidade e escolas de 1º e 2º graus, porque geram oportunidades de exercício de práticas inovadoras no interior das escolas e o desenvolvimento de profissionais reflexivos em educação. Por se voltarem para a renovação simultânea de ambas as instituições envolvidas (universidade e escolas), de seus profissionais e de suas práticas, projetos colaborativos permitem, especialmente, que aprendamos mais sobre formas alternativas de iniciar e consolidar mudanças educacionais.

Private versus public : how one gay professor negotiates the boundaries between his personal and professional lives /

This study examined how one university professor negotiated the boundaries between his personal life as a gay man and his professional life as a teacher. Using his sexual orientation as a focal point, the study explored the circumstances and underlying assumptions that influenced this professor's decisions to disclose information of a personal nature. Data collection was solicited from a number of sources: (a) In-depth interviews with the participant, his colleagues, students, and friends; (b) Field observation of the participant teaching over a 3 -day period; and (c) A document review of lesson plans, course outlines, student feedback forms, and the participant's teaching portfolio. The researcher maintained both observation journals and reflective journals during this process. Data analysis using the constant comparative method elicited several themes. The participant engaged in a variety of strategies in disclosing his sexual orientation that included: (a) no disclosure at all, (b) assuming people knew, (c) casually mentioning it in conversation, and (d) deliberately planning to tell someone. The participant also engaged in an ongoing assessment of his environment that included evaluating the level of risk in disclosing his sexual orientation and assessing the listener's ability to receive the information. The participant cited numerous reasons for disclosing his sexual orientation. Further inquiry revealed a number of belief systems that underlined these reasons. These belief systems included beliefs around privacy, authenticity, teaching, manners, professionalism, and homosexuality. The conclusions suggested that the participant utilized a consistent process in both his personal and professional lives to determine what information was kept private and what information was made public. While the process used to determine the degree of disclosure was consistent, the actual disclosures themselves varied widely in nature.

Report of the Committee to whom was referred so much of the message of the President of the United States, at the Commencement of the session, as relates to the spirit and manner in which the War has been waged by the enemy.--

July 31, 1813. Resolution agreed to and forwarded to the President.

Professor Fred Smoller, Child Study Center, Chapman College, Orange, California

Professor Fred Smoller, Child Study Center, Chapman College, Orange, California, June, 1990.

Professor Kurt Bergel speaking at the dedication for Moulton Hall, Chapman College, Orange, California

Professor Kurt Bergel speaking at the dedication for Moulton Hall, Chapman College, Orange, California,1975. This building is named in memory of an artist and patroness of the arts, Nellie Gail Moulton. Within this structure are the departments of Art, Communications, and Theatre/Dance as well as the Guggenheim Gallery and Waltmar Theatre. Waltmar Theatre was a gift from the late Walter and Margaret Schmid.

Report of the Committee, as relates to the spirit and manner in which the War has been waged by the enemy

July 31, 1813. Resolution agreed to and forwarded to the President. Printed by A and G Way

Les sciences sociales devraient-elles être neutres? : le rôle des chercheurs(ses) face à la normativité du discours éthique et politique, de Weber à Putnam.

L'objectif de ce mémoire est de comprendre la neutralité axiologique non pas comme une exigence épistémologique, mais plutôt comme un idéal éducationnel. Max Weber propose une science basée sur la description factuelle, de laquelle on exclut la formulation de jugements de valeur. Pour l'auteur, il est préférable de séparer les jugements descriptifs des jugements évaluatifs dans le but de préserver l'autonomie intellectuelle des étudiants. Comme il serait contraire au principe d'autonomie de laisser le professeur influencer et convaincre ses étudiants, de façon partisane, d'adhérer à certaines thèses normatives, Weber propose un mécanisme pour éviter que le professeur n'influence ses étudiants de manière illégitime. Les critiques contemporaines de la neutralité axiologique, en particulier celles de Sen et Putnam, voient dans le critère de neutralité un rejet de l'entrelacement logique des faits et des valeurs. Ils critiquent la supposée subjectivité des valeurs et, ce faisant, défendent une conception enrichie de la science où les valeurs éthiques sont présentes. Weber n'a jamais défendu qu'il était impossible de mener une analyse à la fois descriptive et normative. Seulement, on doit s'interroger sur les lieux où s'exprime la normativité, et s'assurer que toutes les conditions sont présentes pour qu'une discussion normative tende réellement à l'objectivité.