Dictionnaire hydrographique de la France, ou, Nomenclature des fleuves, rivieres, ruisseaux et canaux : le lieu où ils prennent leurs sources, leurs embouchures et confluents, leur étendue eû égard à leurs sinuosités, leur commerce flottable ou navigable avec les villes qu'ils arrosent, suivie d'une division hydrographique de ce royaume et d'une description de ses ports &c. ; Enrichie d'une carte de la France relative à l'objet /

Mode of access: Internet.

Relief for American seamen in foreign ports : hearings before the Committee on the Merchant Marine and Fisheries, House of Representatives, Seventy-first Congress, third session, on H. R. 3827, H. R. 3828, H. R. 3829. January 15, 1931.

Mode of access: Internet.

Frank Waterhouse & Company's Pacific ports /

Includes indexes.

Tide Tables, [United States and Foreign Ports]

Mode of access: Internet.

Le Brésil et ses ports; conférence de M. Édouard Quellennec ...

At head of title: Fédération des industriels et commerçants français.

The steam marine of the port of New York, examined in its connection with the southern ports of the United States and the West Indies; and in its communication with the Atlantic and Pacific oceans ...

Published originally in the Journal of commerce.

To establish a federal cost-sharing policy for the construction and maintenance of deep draft ports : hearing before the Subcommittee on Water Resources of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, first session, September 24, 1983--Portsmouth, N.H.

Mode of access: Internet.

World ports.

Mode of access: Internet.

Port and Terminal Charges at United States Ports

Mode of access: Internet.

Ports of Miami, Port Everglades, Palm Beach, and Port Canaveral, Florida /

Includes index.

A Valuation Analysis of the Physical Oceanographic Real Time System (PORTS)

This analysis estimates several economic benefits derived from national implementation of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Physical Oceanographic Real-Time System (PORTS®) at the 175 largest ports in the United States. Significant benefits were observed owing to: (1) lower commercial marine accident rates and resultant reductions in morbidity, mortality and property damage; (2) reduced pollution remediation costs; and, (3) increased productivity associated with operation of more fully loaded commercial vessels. Evidence also suggested additional benefits from heightened commercial and recreational fish catch and diminished recreational boating accidents. Annual gross benefits from 58 current PORTS® locations exceeded $217 million with an addition $83 million possible if installed at the largest remaining 117 ports in the United States. Over the ten-year economic life of PORTS® instruments, the present value for installation at all 175 ports could approach $2.5 billion.

Proposta de implementação da valência músculo esquelética na área de fisioterapia no hospital do Cunene, em Angola

Mestrado em Fisioterapia

Rôle des ports dans le cycle de vie des poissons. Les ports : nurseries de sars ?

Le présent document constitue un rapport final de l’étude dont l’objectif peut s’énoncer comme suit : « les zones portuaires peuvent elles être des nurseries de sars ? ». Tenter de répondre à cette question, simple en apparence, nécessite de mener des études aux niveaux populationnel et individuel et ce afin de comprendre les processus sous-jacents. Quatre volets ont été menés. Dans le premier volet, à partir des données issues du projet Nappex, nous avons étudié les changements spatio-temporels d’abondance de quatre espèces de sars dans cinq marinas réparties le long de la façade Méditerranéenne. Dans un second volet, nous avons cherché à comparer les cinétiques de mortalité post-installation de deux espèces de sars en milieu portuaire et naturel. Dans un troisième volet, la croissance et la condition de deux mêmes espèces de sars ont été comparées entre des zones portuaires et des zones naturelles. Enfin, dans un quatrième volet, nous avons cherché à mettre en place des outils pour appréhender la migration des juvéniles des zones portuaires vers les zones naturelles pour rejoindre les populations adultes.

A Collaborative IT Network for Three Adriatic Maritime Ports

Part 21: Mobility and Logistics

Harmonised framework for ecological risk assessment of sediments from ports and estuarine zones of North and South Atlantic

This paper presents a harmonised framework of sediment quality assessment and dredging material characterisation for estuaries and port zones of North and South Atlantic. This framework, based on the weight-of-evidence approach, provides a structure and a process for conducting sediment/dredging material assessment that leads to a decision. The main structure consists of step 1 (examination of available data); step 2 (chemical characterisation and toxicity assessment); decision 1 (any chemical level higher than reference values? are sediments toxic?); step 3 (assessment of benthic community structure); step 4 (integration of the results); decision 2 (are sediments toxic or benthic community impaired?); step 5 (construction of the decision matrix) and decision 3 (is there environmental risk?). The sequence of assessments may be interrupted when the information obtained is judged to be sufficient for a correct characterisation of the risk posed by the sediments/dredging material. This framework brought novel features compared to other sediment/dredging material risk assessment frameworks: data integration through multivariate analysis allows the identification of which samples are toxic and/or related to impaired benthic communities; it also discriminates the chemicals responsible for negative biological effects; and the framework dispenses the use of a reference area. We demonstrated the successful application of this framework in different port and estuarine zones of the North (Gulf of Cadiz) and South Atlantic (Santos and Paranagua Estuarine Systems).