What do we know about successful software project factors

This dissertation discusses how different practitioners define project success and success factors for software projects and products. The motivation for this work is to identify the way software practitioners’ value and define project success. This can have implications for both practitioner motivation and software development productivity. Accordingly, in this work, we are interested in the various perceptions of the term “success” for different software practitioners and researchers. To get this information we performed a systematic mapping of the recent year’s software development literature trying to identify stakeholders’ perceptions about the success of a project and also possible differences among the views of the various stakeholders of a project. Some common terms related to project success (success project; software project success factors) were considered in formulating the search strings. The results were limited to twenty-two selected peer-reviewed conferences, papers/journal articles, published between 2003 and 2012.

Evolución del conocimiento del hormigón estructural hasta 1973

Esta tesis analiza los criterios con que fueron proyectadas y construidas las estructuras de hormigón hasta 1973, fecha coincidente con la Instrucción EH-73, que en contenido, formato y planteamiento, consagró la utilización de los criterios modernamente utilizados hasta ahora. Es heredera, además, de las CEB 1970. Esos años marcan el cambio de planteamiento desde la Teoría Clásica hacia los Estados Límite. Los objetivos perseguidos son, sintéticamente: 1) Cubrir un vacío patente en el estudio de la evolución del conocimiento. Hay tratados sobre la historia del hormigón que cubren de manera muy completa el relato de personajes y realizaciones, pero no, al menos de manera suficiente, la evolución del conocimiento. 2) Servir de ayuda a los técnicos de hoy para entender configuraciones estructurales, geometrías, disposiciones de armado, formatos de seguridad, etc, utilizados en el pasado, lo que servirá para la redacción más fundada de dictámenes preliminares sobre estructuras existentes. 3) Ser referencia para la realización de estudios de valoración de la capacidad resistente de construcciones existentes, constituyendo la base de un documento pre-normativo orientado en esa dirección. En efecto, esta tesis pretende ser una ayuda para los ingenieros de hoy que se enfrentan a la necesidad de conservar y reparar estructuras de hormigón armado que forman parte del patrimonio heredado. La gran mayoría de las estructuras, fueron construidas hace más de 40 años, por lo que es preciso conocer los criterios que marcaron su diseño, su cálculo y su construcción. Pretende determinar cuáles eran los límites de agotamiento y por tanto de seguridad, de estructuras dimensionadas con criterios de antaño, analizadas por la metodología de cálculo actual. De este modo, se podrá determinar el resguardo existente “real” de las estructuras dimensionadas y calculadas con criterios “distintos” a los actuales. Conocer el comportamiento de las estructuras construidas con criterios de la Teoría Clásica, según los criterios actuales, permitirá al ingeniero de hoy tratar de la forma más adecuada el abanico de necesidades que se puedan presentar en una estructura existente. Este trabajo se centra en la evolución del conocimiento por lo que no se encuentran incluidos los procesos constructivos. En lo relativo a los criterios de proyecto, hasta mediados del siglo XX, éstos se veían muy influidos por los ensayos y trabajos de autor consiguientes, en los que se basaban los reglamentos de algunos países. Era el caso del reglamento prusiano de 1904, de la Orden Circular francesa de 1906, del Congreso de Lieja de 1930. A partir de la segunda mitad del siglo XX, destacan las aportaciones de ingenieros españoles como es el caso de Alfredo Páez Balaca, Eduardo Torroja y Pedro Jiménez Montoya, entre otros, que permitieron el avance de los criterios de cálculo y de seguridad de las estructuras de hormigón, hasta los que se conocen hoy. El criterio rector del proyecto de las estructuras de hormigón se fundó, como es sabido, en los postulados de la Teoría Clásica, en particular en el “momento crítico”, aquel para el que hormigón y acero alcanzan sus tensiones admisibles y, por tanto, asegura el máximo aprovechamiento de los materiales y sin pretenderlo conscientemente, la máxima ductilidad. Si el momento solicitante es mayor que el crítico, se dispone de armadura en compresión. Tras el estudio de muchas de las estructuras existentes de la época por el autor de esta tesis, incluyendo entre ellas las Colecciones Oficiales de Puentes de Juan Manuel de Zafra, Eugenio Ribera y Carlos Fernández Casado, se concluye que la definición geométrica de las mismas no se corresponde exactamente con la resultante del momento crítico, dado que como ahora resultaba necesario armonizar los criterios de armado a nivel sección con la organización de la ferralla a lo largo de los diferentes elementos estructurales. Los parámetros de cálculo, resistencias de los materiales y formatos de seguridad, fueron evolucionando con los años. Se fueron conociendo mejor las prestaciones de los materiales, se fue enriqueciendo la experiencia de los propios procesos constructivos y, en menor medida, de las acciones solicitantes y, consiguientemente, acotándose las incertidumbres asociadas lo cual permitió ir ajustando los coeficientes de seguridad a emplear en el cálculo. Por ejemplo, para el hormigón se empleaba un coeficiente de seguridad igual a 4 a finales del siglo XIX, que evolucionó a 3,57 tras la publicación de la Orden Circular francesa de 1906, y a 3, tras la Instrucción española de 1939. En el caso del acero, al ser un material bastante más conocido por cuanto se había utilizado muchísimo previamente, el coeficiente de seguridad permaneció casi constante a lo largo de los años, con un valor igual a 2. Otra de las causas de la evolución de los parámetros de cálculo fue el mejor conocimiento del comportamiento de las estructuras merced a la vasta tarea de planificación y ejecución de ensayos, con los estudios teóricos consiguientes, realizados por numerosos autores, principalmente austríacos y alemanes, pero también norteamericanos y franceses. En cuanto a los criterios de cálculo, puede sorprender al técnico de hoy el conocimiento que tenían del comportamiento del hormigón desde los primeros años del empleo del mismo. Sabían del comportamiento no lineal del hormigón, pero limitaban su trabajo a un rango de tensióndeformación lineal porque eso aseguraba una previsión del comportamiento estructural conforme a las hipótesis de la Elasticidad Lineal y de la Resistencia de Materiales, muy bien conocidas a principios del s. XX (no así sucedía con la teoría de la Plasticidad, aún sin formular, aunque estaba implícita en los planteamientos algunos ingenieros especializados en estructuras de fábrica (piedra o ladrillo) y metálicas. Además, eso permitía independizar un tanto el proyecto de los valores de las resistencias reales de los materiales, lo que liberaba de la necesidad de llevar a cabo ensayos que, en la práctica, apenas se podían hacer debido a la escasez de los laboratorios. Tampoco disponían de programas informáticos ni de ninguna de las facilidades de las que hoy se tienen, que les permitiera hacer trabajar al hormigón en un rango no lineal. Así, sabia y prudentemente, limitaban las tensiones y deformaciones del material a un rango conocido. El modus operandi seguido para la elaboración de esta tesis, ha sido el siguiente: -Estudio documental: se han estudiado documentos de autor, recomendaciones y normativa generada en este ámbito, tanto en España como con carácter internacional, de manera sistemática con arreglo al índice del documento. En este proceso, se han detectado lagunas del conocimiento (y su afección a la seguridad estructural, en su caso) y se han identificado las diferencias con los procedimientos de hoy. También ha sido necesario adaptar la notación y terminología de la época a los criterios actuales, lo que ha supuesto una dificultad añadida. -Desarrollo del documento: A partir del estudio previo se han ido desarrollando los siguientes documentos, que conforman el contenido de la tesis: o Personajes e instituciones relevantes por sus aportaciones al conocimiento de las estructuras de hormigón (investigación, normativa, docencia). o Caracterización de las propiedades mecánicas de los materiales (hormigón y armaduras), en relación a sus resistencias, diagramas tensión-deformación, módulos de deformación, diagramas momento-curvatura, etc. Se incluye aquí la caracterización clásica de los hormigones, la geometría y naturaleza de las armaduras, etc. o Formatos de seguridad: Se trata de un complejo capítulo del que se pretende extraer la información suficiente que permita a los técnicos de hoy entender los criterios utilizados entonces y compararlos con los actuales. o Estudio de secciones y piezas sometidas a tensiones normales y tangenciales: Se trata de presentar la evolución en el tratamiento de la flexión simple y compuesta, del cortante, del rasante, torsión, etc. Se tratan también en esta parte del estudio aspectos que, no siendo de preocupación directa de los técnicos de antaño (fisuración y deformaciones), tienen hoy mayor importancia frente a cambios de usos y condiciones de durabilidad. o Detalles de armado: Incluye el tratamiento de la adherencia, el anclaje, el solapo de barras, el corte de barras, las disposiciones de armado en función de la geometría de las piezas y sus solicitaciones, etc. Es un capítulo de importancia obvia para los técnicos de hoy. Se incluye un anejo con las referencias más significativas a los estudios experimentales en que se basaron las propuestas que han marcado hito en la evolución del conocimiento. Finalmente, junto a las conclusiones más importantes, se enuncian las propuestas de estudios futuros. This thesis analyzes the criteria with which structures of reinforced concrete have been designed and constructed prior to 1973. Initially, the year 1970 was chosen as starting point, coinciding with the CEB recommendations, but with the development of the thesis it was decided that 1973 was the better option, coinciding with the Spanish regulations of 1973, whose content, format and description introduced the current criteria. The studied period includes the Classic Theory. The intended goals of this thesis are: 1) To cover a clear gap in the study of evolution of knowledge about reinforced concrete. The concept and accomplishments achieved by reinforced concrete itself has been treated in a very complete way by the main researchers in this area, but not the evolution of knowledge in this subject area. 2) To help the engineers understand structural configurations, geometries, dispositions of steel, safety formats etc, that will serve as preliminary judgments by experts on existing structures. To be a reference to the existing studies about the valuation of resistant capacity of existing constructions, constituting a basic study of a pre-regulation document. This thesis intends to be a help for the current generation of engineers who need to preserve and repair reinforced concrete structures that have existed for a significant number of years. Most of these structures in question were constructed more than 40 years ago, and it is necessary to know the criteria that influenced their design, the calculation and the construction. This thesis intends to determine the safety limits of the old structures and analyze them in the context of the current regulations and their methodology. Thus, it will then be possible to determine the safety of these structures, after being measured and calculated with the current criteria. This will allow the engineers to optimize the treatment of such a structure. This work considers the evolution of the knowledge, so constructive methods are not included. Related to the design criteria, there existed until middle of the 20th century a large number of diverse European tests and regulations, such as the Prussian norm of 1904, the Circular French Order of 1906, the Congress of Liège of 1930, as well as individual engineers’ own notes and criteria which incorporated the results of their own tests. From the second half of the 20th century, the contributions of Spanish engineers as Alfredo Páez Balaca, Eduardo Torroja and Pedro Jiménez Montoya, among others, were significant and this allowed the advancement of the criteria of the calculation of safety standards of concrete structures, many of which still exist to the present day. The design and calculation of reinforced concrete structures by the Classic Theory, was based on the ‘Critical Bending Moment’, when concrete and steel achieve their admissible tensions, that allows the best employment of materials and the best ductility. If the bending moment is major than the critical bending moment, will be necessary to introduce compression steel. After the study of the designs of many existing structures of that time by the author of this thesis, including the Historical Collections of Juan Manuel de Zafra, Eugenio Ribera and Carlos Fernandez Casado, the conclusion is that the geometric definition of the structures does not correspond exactly with the critical bending moment inherent in the structures. The parameters of these calculations changed throughout the years. The principal reason that can be outlined is that the materials were improving gradually and the number of calculated uncertainties were decreasing, thus allowing the reduction of the safety coefficients to use in the calculation. For example, concrete used a coefficient of 4 towards the end of the 19th century, which evolved to 3,57 after the publication of the Circular French Order of 1906, and then to 3 after the Spanish Instruction of 1939. In the case of the steel, a much more consistent material, the safety coefficient remained almost constant throughout the years, with a value of 2. Other reasons related to the evolution of the calculation parameters were that the tests and research undertaken by an ever-increasing number of engineers then allowed a more complete knowledge of the behavior of reinforced concrete. What is surprising is the extent of knowledge that existed about the behavior of the concrete from the outset. Engineers from the early years knew that the behavior of the concrete was non-linear, but they limited the work to a linear tension-deformation range. This was due to the difficulties of work in a non-linear range, because they did not have laboratories to test concrete, or facilities such as computers with appropriate software, something unthinkable today. These were the main reasons engineers of previous generations limited the tensions and deformations of a particular material to a known range. The modus operandi followed for the development of this thesis is the following one: -Document study: engineers’ documents, recommendations and regulations generated in this area, both from Spain or overseas, have been studied in a systematic way in accordance with the index of the document. In this process, a lack of knowledge has been detected concerning structural safety, and differences to current procedures have been identified and noted. Also, it has been necessary to adapt the notation and terminology of the Classic Theory to the current criteria, which has imposed an additional difficulty. -Development of the thesis: starting from the basic study, the next chapters of this thesis have been developed and expounded upon: o People and relevant institutions for their contribution to the knowledge about reinforced concrete structures (investigation, regulation, teaching). Determination of the mechanical properties of the materials (concrete and steel), in relation to their resistances, tension-deformation diagrams, modules of deformation, moment-curvature diagrams, etc. Included are the classic characterizations of concrete, the geometry and nature of the steel, etc. Safety formats: this is a very difficult chapter from which it is intended to provide enough information that will then allow the present day engineer to understand the criteria used in the Classic Theory and then to compare them with the current theories. Study of sections and pieces subjected to normal and tangential tensions: it intends to demonstrate the evolution in the treatment of the simple and complex flexion, shear, etc. Other aspects examined include aspects that were not very important in the Classic Theory but currently are, such as deformation and fissures. o Details of reinforcement: it includes the treatment of the adherence, the anchorage, the lapel of bars, the cut of bars, the dispositions of reinforcement depending on the geometry of the pieces and the solicitations, etc. It is a chapter of obvious importance for current engineers. The document will include an annex with the most references to the most significant experimental studies on which were based the proposals that have become a milestone in the evolution of knowledge in this area. Finally, there will be included conclusions and suggestions of future studies. A deep study of the documentation and researchers of that time has been done, juxtaposing their criteria and results with those considered relevant today, and giving a comparison between the resultant safety standards according to the Classic Theory criteria and currently used criteria. This thesis fundamentally intends to be a guide for engineers who have to treat or repair a structure constructed according to the Classic Theory criteria.

GESTÃO DO CONHECIMENTO: UM ESTUDO SOBRE A RELAÇÃO ENTRE A LIDERANÇA TRANSFORMACIONAL, A CONVERSÃO DO CONHECIMENTO E A EFICÁCIA ORGANIZACIONAL

Este estudo teve como objetivo principal analisar a relação entre a Liderança Transformacional, a Conversão do Conhecimento e a Eficácia Organizacional. Foram considerados como pressupostos teóricos conceitos consolidados sobre os temas desta relação, além de recentes pesquisas já realizadas em outros países e contextos organizacionais. Com base nisto identificou-se potencial estudo de um modelo que relacionasse estes três conceitos. Para tal considera-se que as organizações que buscam atingir Vantagem Competitiva e incorporam a Knowledge-Based View possam conquistar diferenciação frente a seus concorrentes. Nesse contexto o conhecimento ganha maior destaque e papel protagonista nestas organizações. Dessa forma criar conhecimento através de seus colaboradores, passa a ser um dos desafios dessas organizações ao passo que sugere melhoria de seus indicadores Econômicos, Sociais, Sistêmicos e Políticos, o que se define por Eficácia Organizacional. Portanto os modos de conversão do conhecimento nas organizações, demonstram relevância, uma vez que se cria e se converte conhecimentos através da interação entre o conhecimento existente de seus colaboradores. Essa conversão do conhecimento ou modelo SECI possui quatro modos que são a Socialização, Externalização, Combinação e Internalização. Nessa perspectiva a liderança nas organizações apresenta-se como um elemento capaz de influenciar seus colaboradores, propiciando maior dinâmica ao modelo SECI de conversão do conhecimento. Se identifica então na liderança do tipo Transformacional, características que possam influenciar colaboradores e entende-se que esta relação entre a Liderança Transformacional e a Conversão do Conhecimento possa ter influência positiva nos indicadores da Eficácia Organizacional. Dessa forma esta pesquisa buscou analisar um modelo que explorasse essa relação entre a liderança do tipo Transformacional, a Conversão do Conhecimento (SECI) e a Eficácia Organizacional. Esta pesquisa teve o caráter quantitativo com coleta de dados através do método survey, obtendo um total de 230 respondentes válidos de diferentes organizações. O instrumento de coleta de dados foi composto por afirmativas relativas ao modelo de relação pesquisado com um total de 44 itens. O perfil de respondentes concentrou-se entre 30 e 39 anos de idade, com a predominância de organizações privadas e de departamentos de TI/Telecom, Docência e Recursos Humanos respectivamente. O tratamento dos dados foi através da Análise Fatorial Exploratória e Modelagem de Equações Estruturais via Partial Least Square Path Modeling (PLS-PM). Como resultado da análise desta pesquisa, as hipóteses puderam ser confirmadas, concluindo que a Liderança Transformacional apresenta influência positiva nos modos de Conversão do Conhecimento e que; a Conversão do Conhecimento influencia positivamente na Eficácia Organizacional. Ainda, concluiu-se que a percepção entre os respondentes não apresenta resultado diferente sobre o modelo desta pesquisa entre quem possui ou não função de liderança.

Be Careful Where You Smile : Culture Shapes Judgments of Intelligence and Honesty of Smiling Individuals

We thank all the supporting team-members involved in the translation procedures and data collections. Research was supported by the Polish NCN Grant 2011/03/N/HS6/05112 (K.K.) and Chinese NNSF Grant 31200788 (C.X).

Rhesus monkeys know when they remember

Humans are consciously aware of some memories and can make verbal reports about these memories. Other memories cannot be brought to consciousness, even though they influence behavior. This conspicuous difference in access to memories is central in taxonomies of human memory systems but has been difficult to document in animal studies, suggesting that some forms of memory may be unique to humans. Here I show that rhesus macaque monkeys can report the presence or absence of memory. Although it is probably impossible to document subjective, conscious properties of memory in nonverbal animals, this result objectively demonstrates an important functional parallel with human conscious memory. Animals able to discern the presence and absence of memory should improve accuracy if allowed to decline memory tests when they have forgotten, and should decline tests most frequently when memory is attenuated experimentally. One of two monkeys examined unequivocally met these criteria under all test conditions, whereas the second monkey met them in all but one case. Probe tests were used to rule out “cueing” by a wide variety of environmental and behavioral stimuli, leaving detection of the absence of memory per se as the most likely mechanism underlying the monkeys' abilities to selectively decline memory tests when they had forgotten.

Plant genome values: How much do we know?

Plants are the basis of life on earth. We cannot overemphasize their importance. The value of plant genome initiatives is self-evident. The need is to identify priorities for action. The angiosperm genome is highly variable, but the extent of this variability is unknown. Uncertainties remain about the number of genes and the number of species living. Many plants will become extinct before they are discovered. We risk losing both genes and vital information about plant uses. There are also major gaps in our karyotypic knowledge. No chromosome count exists for >70% of angiosperm species. DNA C values are known for only ≈1% of angiosperms, a sample unrepresentative of the global flora. Researchers reported new relationships between genome size and characters of major interest for plant breeding and the environment and the need for more data. In 1997, a Royal Botanic Gardens Kew workshop identified gaps and planned international collaboration to fill them. An electronic version of the Angiosperm DNA C value database also was published. Another initiative, which will make a very significant contribution to the conservation of plant genetic diversity on a global scale is Kew’s Millennium Seed Bank, partly funded by the U.K. Millennium Commission, celebrating the year 2000. Costing up to £80 million (£1 = $1.62), its main aims are to collect and conserve the seed of almost all of the U.K. spermatophyte flora by the year 2000, to collect and conserve a further 10% of the world spermatophyte flora principally from the drylands by 2009, and to provide a world class building as the focus of this activity by 2000.

What We Don't Know Can Hurt Us: Clinical Inference Bias and Constructed Memories of Sexual Abuse.

The false memory/recovered memory debate, research regarding the malleability of memory, and the current lack of methods for validating recovered memories all support the view that heightened care is required of therapists dealing with clients whom they suspect have been sexually abused. The judgmental heuristics that underlie the major clinical inference biases of confirmatory bias, biased covariation, base rate fallacies, and schematic processing errors are all relevant to the processes leading to therapist-client constructions of memories of sexual abuse. Suggestions for minimizing each of these biases are offered. Personal motivations of the client and client suggestibility are factors that may contribute to the construction of memories of sexual abuse, and suggestions for minimizing the impact of these motivations are offered. In conclusion, general suggestions for minimizing the impact of clinical inference biases within the sexual abuse treatment context are summarized.

Do we really know the prevalence of accomodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions?

Purpose: To determine the scientific evidence about the prevalence of accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular anomalies. Methods: We carried out a systematic review of studies published between 1986 and 2009, analysing the MEDLINE, CINAHL, FRANCIS and PsycINFO databases. We considered admitting those papers related to prevalence in paediatric and adult populations. We identified 660 articles and 10 papers met the inclusion criteria. Results: There is a wide range of prevalence, particularly for accommodative insufficiency (2 %-61.7 %) and convergence insufficiency (2.25 %-33 %). More studies are available for children (7) compared with adults (3). Most of studies examine clinical population (5 studies) with 3 assessed at schools and 1 at University with samples that vary from 65 to 2048 patients. There is great variability regarding the number of diagnostic signs ranging from 1 to 5 clinical signs. We found a relation between the number of clinical signs used and prevalence values for convergence insufficiency although this relationship cannot be confirmed for other conditions. Conclusion: There is a lack of proper epidemiological studies about the prevalence of accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular anomalies. Studies reviewed examine consecutive or selected patients in clinical settings and schools but in any case they are randomized and representative of their populations with no data for general population. The wide discrepancies in prevalence figures are due to both sample population and the lack of uniformity in diagnostic criteria so that it makes difficult to compile results. Biases and limitations of reports determine that prevalence rates offered are only estimations from selected populations.

Habermas y el problema de la verdad

El texto revisa los problemas que ha suscitado el abandono, por parte de Habermas, de una concepción epistémica de la verdad. Este autor ha sostenido que los enunciados descriptivos pueden ser verdaderos o falsos (en un sentido no epistémico) y los juicios morales correctos o incorrectos (en un sentido epistémico). Las expresiones evaluativas no se encontrarían en ninguno de esos casos y no podrían aspirar a una validez independiente del contexto. El artículo examina —a la luz de la literatura— las críticas que esa posición ha suscitado. En general, se ha sostenido que mientras un enunciado descriptivo podría ser verdadero aunque no sepamos cómo justificarlo, no tendría sentido decir que un enunciado moral es correcto aunque no sepamos cómo justificarlo. Ello ocurriría porque mientras el concepto de verdad de Habermas es no epistémico, el concepto de corrección lo es. Para superar esa asimetría, McCarthy ha sugerido un concepto de corrección puramente procedimental; Putnam un concepto de verdad deflacionada; y Lafont una tesis realista tanto en el plano natural como moral.