963 resultados para European Charter of fundamental rights


Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Annual Report, Agency Performance Plan

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Annual Report, Agency Performance Plan

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Right from the beginning of the development of the medical specialty of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) the harmonization of the fields of competence and the specialist training across Europe was always an important issue. The initially informal European collaboration was formalized in 1963 under the umbrella of the European Federation of PRM. The European Academy of PRM and the UEMS section of PRM started to contribute in 1969 and 1974 respectively. In 1991 the European Board of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (EBPRM) was founded with the specific task of harmonizing education and training in PRM in Europe. The EBPRM has progressively defined curricula for the teaching of medical students and for the postgraduate education and training of PRM specialists. It also created a harmonized European certification system for medical PRM specialists, PRM trainers and PRM training sites. European teaching initiatives for PRM trainees (European PRM Schools) were promoted and learning material for PRM trainees and PRM specialists (e-learning, books and e-books, etc.) was created. For the future the Board will have to ensure that a minimal specific undergraduate curriculum on PRM based on a detailed European catalogue of learning objectives will be taught in all medical schools in Europe as a basis for the general medical practice. To stimulate the harmonization of national curricula, the existing postgraduate curriculum will be expanded by a syllabus of competencies related to PRM and a catalogue of learning objectives to be reached by all European PRM trainees. The integration of the certifying examination of the PRM Board into the national assessment procedures for PRM specialists will also have to be promoted.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

State Agency Audit Report

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

State Agency Audit Report

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

State Audit Reports

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

This report is published in accordance with the Accountable Government Act to improve decision-making and increase accountability to stakeholders and citizens. This report contains performance information regarding our primary programs including, the Youth Leadership Forum, the College Leadership Forum, the State Access Grant and the Client Assistance Program. Major accomplishments this year include continuation of our core programs, a key role in the Iowa Great Places initiative and providing Cultural Competency training to governmental and non-governmental agencies.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

State Audit Reports

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

the Division of Persons with Disabilities, Iowa Department of Human Rights, Performance Report for fiscal year 2006 (July 1, 2005 – June 30, 2006). This report is published in accordance with the Accountable Government Act to improve decision-making and increase accountability to stakeholders and citizens. This report contains performance information regarding our primary programs including, the Youth Leadership Forum, the College Leadership Forum, the State Access Grant and the Client Assistance Program.

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Annual Report, Agency Performance Plan

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Annual Report, Agency Performance Plan

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Annual Report, Agency Performance Plan

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Audit report on the Iowa Department of Human Rights for the year ended June 30, 2006

Relevância:

100.00% 100.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Adopting a simplistic view of Coase (1960), most economic analyses of property rightsdisregard both the key advantage that legal property rights (that is, in rem rights) provide torightholders in terms of enhanced enforcement, and the difficulties they pose to acquirers interms of information asymmetry about legal title. Consequently, these analyses tend to overstatethe role of "private ordering" and disregard the two key elements of property law: first, theessential conflict between property (that is, in rem) enforcement and transaction costs; and,second, the institutional solutions created to overcome it, mainly contractual registries capable ofmaking truly impersonal (that is, asset-based) trade viable when previous relevant transactionson the same assets are not verifiable by judges. This paper fills this gap by reinterpreting bothelements within the Coasean framework and thus redrawing the institutional foundations of bothproperty and corporate contracting.