Feo, inútil, inestable: pensamiento crítico contemporáneo y procesos proyectivos en arquitectura = Ugly, useless, unstable: contemporary critical thought and projective processes in architecture

La presente tesis doctoral persigue dos objetivos simultáneos: Determinar el alcance de los criterios clásicos para la evaluación de arquitectura y poner en crisis la prevalencia de esos mismos criterios dentro del marco crítico y productivo actual. En concreto, esta tesis se interroga sobre la posible contribución de determinadas corrientes del pensamiento post-estructuralista y neo-materialista a las tareas de expansión y transformación de los criterios clásicos antes mencionados. Asimismo, se plantea la oportunidad de formalizar estas incorporaciones conceptuales como metodologías para el proyectar arquitectónico. La tesis emplea un análisis pormenorizado de las cualidades implícitas en la triada Firmitas, Utilitas, Venustas elaborada por Vitruvio como vehículo para calibrar la influencia de los paradigmas de pensamiento clásico en nuestras posiciones críticas contemporáneas. Como reacción al carácter dominante de dichos paradigmas, y con la ayuda de una compilación selectiva de ejemplos procedentes de los campos artístico y arquitectónico, la presente tesis procede a examinar y clasificar diversas estrategias arquitectónicas basadas en la no conformidad con los criterios clásicos de evaluación de la disciplina. A la hora de realizar esta tarea, y con el objetivo de superar el dualismo trascendental que caracteriza la gran mayoría de dichos criterios clásicos, se propone un modelo analítico y multidimensional que formula las instancias arquitectónicas como posibles posiciones dentro de un extenso continuo combinatorio de cualidades formales, estructurales y organizativas. Este modelo conceptual permite replantear el aparente antagonismo entre los principios de Vitruvio y sus opuestos, estableciendo en su lugar un dominio operativo continuo de producción arquitectónica. Esta operación abre una ventana de oportunidad para expandir los límites del marco crítico actual más allá de las fronteras establecidas por nuestra herencia clásica. En consecuencia con esta voluntad, la presente tesis pretende habilitar un ámbito para el análisis crítico de las estrategias que caracterizan ciertas corrientes del proyectar contemporáneo, pero también contribuir a informar nuevas aproximaciones metodológicas al proceso de proyecto, desplazando progresivamente su foco desde lo descriptivo hacia lo proyectivo. ABSTRACT This doctoral thesis attempts to simultaneously determine the scope of the classical criteria for the evaluation of architecture and challenge their prevalence within the current framework of architectural production and criticism. It examines how specific strands of post-structuralism and neo-materialism may contribute to both the expansion and the transformation of these criteria and, in doing so, sets itself the goal of mobilising these conceptual incorporations as explicit design methodologies. A detailed analysis of the formal, structural and organisational qualities implicit in Vitruvius’ triad Firmitas, Utilitas, Venustas is used as a starting point to determine the influence of classical paradigms in our current critical positions. As a reaction to this critical pervasiveness, and supported by a curated collection of artistic and architectural works, diverse approaches to non-compliance with the classical criteria of assessment are examined and classified. In order to facilitate this endeavour -and to overcome the transcendental dualism of most classical critical approaches in architecture- this thesis puts forward an analytical, multidimensional model that formulates architectural instances as possible positions within a larger combinatory continuum of formal, structural and organisational qualities. Using this conceptual model, the apparent antagonism between Vitruvius’ principles and its non-compliant opposites is reframed as a continuous operative domain of architectural production, which in turn opens up a window of opportunity to expand the limits of our critical framework beyond the boundaries of classical paradigms. In doing so, this thesis attempts not only to foster a better understanding of some of the strategic approaches that characterise contemporary systems of architectural production, but also to inform future methodological approaches to architectural design, hence situating itself beyond the domain of the descriptive and moving towards the projective.

La unidad de lo dual : tradición y modernidad en la obra de Tadao Ando y Toyo Ito

La referencia a la tradición como una fuerza capaz de aportar unidad, al abarcar tanto la continuidad como los cambios en las expresiones al margen de la época o las técnicas empleadas, ha sido siempre un componente muy importante de las manifestaciones artísticas de Japón y es la sutil ligazón que las conecta desde el pasado hasta la actualidad. Se entiende aquí que tradición no equivale simplemente a preservación, sino que se trata de una transmisión con una vertiente dual, pues permite una constante evolución sin que se altere su esencia básica. Es de esta forma que la cultura japonesa de la era Edo (1600-1868), con su alto grado de innovación, riqueza y sofisticación, pero además como epílogo histórico previo a la Restauración Meiji de 1868, ha sido la referencia clave en lo relativo a esa mirada a la tradición nipona para el desarrollo de esta tesis. A partir de la segunda mitad del siglo XIX, todas estas características tan genuinas del período Edo quedaron en suspenso y, desde entonces, Japón ha seguido la vía de la modernización (que en muchos aspectos ha sido también la de la occidentalización). Los entrelazamientos de otras dualidades provocados en Japón por los ataques nucleares de 1945 condujeron a una inevitable fusión de aquel mundo físico con el mundo metafísico, de aquella terrible presencia con un tremendo sentimiento de ausencia y, en definitiva, de Oriente con Occidente. El consiguiente impacto sobre la cultura de la nación tuvo una especial repercusión en el ámbito arquitectónico. En este sentido, el pensamiento francés ha desempeñado un papel fundamental en el replanteamiento radical de muchos supuestos esenciales, de muchos conceptos y valores de la cultura occidental, incluyendo los procedentes de la Ilustración, en este mundo contemporáneo que es cada vez más complejo y plural. Éstos y otros hechos otorgan a la cultura japonesa tradicional una cualidad multidimensional (frente a la marcada bidimensionalidad que suele caracterizar a las culturas occidentales) que, tal y como esta tesis doctoral pretende poner de manifiesto, podría revelarse como una «síntesis de contradicciones» en la obra de los arquitectos japoneses Tadao Ando (Osaka, 1941-) y Toyo Ito (Keijo, actual Seúl, 1941-). En el pensamiento oriental una dualidad es entendida como la complementariedad entre dos polos, sólo en apariencia opuestos, que integra dos vertientes de un único concepto. Al igual que la idea de «parejas» budista, concebida según esta doctrina como una unidad entre dos extremos inevitablemente interrelacionados, el objetivo principal sería el de poner de manifiesto cómo la obra de ambos arquitectos trata de resolver los mismos conflictos partiendo de puntos de vista polarizados. ABSTRACT The reference to tradition as a force for unity, encompassing both continuity and changes in expressions regardless of the time or techniques used, has always been a very important component of the artistic manifestations of Japan and it is the subtle link that connects them from the past to the present. It is understood here that tradition does not mean simply preservation, but it is a transmission with a dual aspect, because it allows a constant evolution without altering its basic essence. It is thus that the Japanese culture of the Edo era (1600-1868), with its high degree of innovation, wealth and sophistication, but also as a historical epilogue prior to the Meiji Restoration of 1868 has been the key reference concerning that look to the Japanese tradition for the development of this thesis. From the second half of the 19th century, all these as genuine features of the Edo period remained at a standstill and, since then, Japan has followed the path of modernization (which has also been that of Westernization in many ways). The interlacements of other dualities caused in Japan by the 1945 nuclear attacks led to an inevitable fusion of the physical with the metaphysical world, of that terrible presence with a tremendous sense of absence and, eventually, of East with West. The resulting impact on the culture of the nation had a special repercussion on the architectural field. In this sense, the French thought has played a key role in the radical rethinking of many core assumptions, many concepts and values of Western thought, including those from the Age of Enlightenment, in this contemporary world that is increasingly complex and plural. These and other facts give the traditional Japanese culture a multidimensional quality (opposed to the marked two-dimensionality that usually characterizes Western cultures). As this thesis aims to highlight, this could prove to be a «synthesis of contradictions» in the work of Japanese architects Tadao Ando (Osaka, 1941-) and Toyo Ito (Keijo, current Seoul, 1941-). In the Eastern thought a duality is understood as the complementarity between two poles, only apparently opposite, which integrates two aspects of a single concept. Like the Buddhist notion of «couples» (conceived according to this doctrine as a unity between two inevitably interlinked extremes) the main objective would be to show how the work of both architects tries to resolve the same conflicts starting with polarized viewpoints.

The Thought Leaders Roundtable Discussion about Race Relations in Missouri

https://bluetigercommons.lincolnu.edu/pli/1008/thumbnail.jpg

Plant genomics: More than food for thought

In all but the poorest countries of South Asia and Africa, the supply and quality of food will rise to meet the demand. Biotechnology, accelerated by genomics, will create wealth for both producers and consumers by reducing the cost and increasing the quality of food. Famine and malnutrition in the poorest countries may be alleviated by applying genomics or other tools of biotechnology to improving subsistence crops. The role of the public sector and the impact of patent law both could be great, but government policies on these issues are still unclear.

Islamic Political Thought: Reviving a Rationalist Tradition

This work develops the foundations of an Islamic argument for secular, liberal democracy from within the Islamic discursive tradition. First, it challenges the presentation of contemporary Islamic political thought as a unified, continuous development of the classical canon by showing the influence of the now marginalized medieval rationalists in the development of Islamic political thought. The classical rationalist concern with divine justice forced the founders of Sunni orthodoxy to state their epistemologies and their positions on ethical ontology. The orthodox positions, and their related methods of legal-juristic reasoning, are shown to be incapable of accommodating the modern Islamic positions on political representation, slavery, and just war. This leads to the second argument of the work, that the modern Islamic discourse is better understood as a reflection of the central concern with justice and its rationalist epistemology and ethical ontology we find in the writings of classical rationalists. This argument is made by examining the works of three classical rationalists, a theologian, a philosopher, and a historian. Their political positions, shaped by their rationalism and concern with justice, challenged their orthodox contemporaries, and provide substantive critiques of the classical political accommodations, methods of politico-legal reasoning, and hence, of modern Islamist political projects. The final chapter reveals how far the mainstream of Islamic political thought has deviated from the classical discourses, since the 19th century, by adopting the language and ideals of the European Enlightenment. This shift is presented as a triumph of classical rationalism over literalism, whose epistemological foundations and ontological implications have yet to be acknowledged and appreciated.

“Fall” and Redemption in the Thought of Martin Heidegger and Jacques Lacan

This dissertation examines and develops Martin Heidegger’s concept of “falling” as a significant historical-philosophical principle. Falling, however, is primarily understood as a concept of the early Heidegger, whereas I argue that Heidegger continues to rely upon it, both explicitly and implicitly, throughout his career. Falling is a description ofphilosophical and Western history, known as metaphysics, and the description of man’s relationship to Being. Thus, falling relates to the most significant streams in Heidegger’s later thought, too, including the truth of Being, the death of God, the gods, the overcoming of metaphysics, and meditative thinking. I then reinterpret the traditional theology of the Fall narrative from Genesis in light of falling as philosophical concept, extending Heidegger’s own “destruction” of Western metaphysics in relation to one of its grounding myths. I move on to demonstrate the significance of a falling understanding in a rereading of the death of God and the end of metaphysics by examining Heidegger’s engagement with Nietzsche. I conclude by incorporating Jacques Lacan’s psychoanalysis as a further extension of Heidegger’s discourse on falling, showing that the subject’s discourse and relationship to the truth of Being is at the core of his constitution and neurosis.

Stirner – on the brink of scientific thought

Stirner and Feyerabend, despite being historically a hundred and fifty years apart, seem to have been of the same mind in revolting against the methodological explaining of what cannot methodologically be explained. Stirner attempted an explanation in a more intuitive version, Feyerabend in a more sophisticated one. For both thinkers it is obviously important to sustain dissent with the assumption that method is the one and only vital promoter of scientific progress. They equally voice the opinion that, despite science itself producing inconsistencies as well as results, its proceedings nonetheless follow a certain rationale. But to codify a definite approach to phenomena or matter i.e. to establish a definite method for taking a look into things turns science into religion and scientists into believers. As a result no new insights are to be gained.

The churches and modern thought, an inquiry into the grounds of unbelief and an appeal for candour,

Mode of access: Internet.

Brazilian Portuguese from thought to word,

Includes index.

A catena of Buddhist scriptures from the Chinese.

Mode of access: Internet.