DESIGN OF A LIQUID FUEL INJECTOR FOR ALTERNATIVE FUEL STUDIES IN AN ATMOSPHERIC MODEL GAS TURBINE COMBUSTOR

A new liquid-fuel injector was designed for use in the atmospheric-pressure, model gas turbine combustor in Bucknell University’s Combustion Research Laboratory during alternative fuel testing. The current liquid-fuel injector requires a higher-than-desired pressure drop and volumetric flow rate to provide proper atomization of liquid fuels. An air-blast atomizer type of fuel injector was chosen and an experiment utilizing water as the working fluid was performed on a variable-geometry prototype. Visualization of the spray pattern was achieved through photography and the pressure drop was measured as a function of the required operating parameters. Experimental correlations were used to estimate droplet sizes over flow conditions similar to that which would be experienced in the actual combustor. The results of this experiment were used to select the desired geometric parameters for the proposed final injector design and a CAD model was generated. Eventually, the new injector will be fabricated and tested to provide final validation of the design prior to use in the combustion test apparatus.

Macrocerebellum: Significance and Pathogenic Considerations

Macrocerebellum is a rare finding characterized by an abnormally large cerebellum. Only few patients with a syndromal or isolated macrocerebellum have been reported so far. This article aims to categorize the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, quantitate the macrocerebellum by volumetric analysis, characterize the neurological and dysmorphic features and cognitive outcome, and report the results of genetic analyses in children with macrocerebellum. All MR images were qualitatively evaluated for infratentorial and supratentorial abnormalities. Volumetric analysis was performed. Data about neurological and dysmorphic features, outcome, and genetic analysis were collected from clinical histories and follow-up examinations. Five patients were included. Volumetric analysis in three patients confirmed large cerebellar size compared to age-matched controls. MR evaluation showed that thickening of the cortical gray matter of the cerebellar hemispheres is responsible for the macrocerebellum. Additional infratentorial and supratentorial abnormalities were present in all patients. Muscular hypotonia, as well as impaired motor and cognitive development, was found in all patients, with ocular movement disorders in three of five patients. The five patients differed significantly in terms of dysmorphic features and involvement of extracerebral organs. Submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations were found in two patients. Macrocerebellum is caused by thickening of the cortical gray matter of the cerebellar hemispheres, suggesting that cerebellar granule cells may be involved in its development. Patients with macrocerebellum show highly heterogeneous neuroimaging, clinical, and genetic findings, suggesting that macrocerebellum is not a nosological entity, but instead represents the structural manifestation of a deeper, more basic biological disturbance common to heterogeneous disorders.

Fantasy Making the Invisible Visible: Liminality in Neil Gaiman's Neverwhere and American Gods

The purpose of this thesis was to examine the ways in which the fantasy genre is ideally positioned for discussing social issues, such as invisibility and liminality. Elements associated with invisibility, such as poverty, homelessness, and alienation, were explored within two novels by Neil Gaiman: Neverwhere and American Gods. Gaiman's application of these elements within the fantasy genre were juxtaposed with samples from other genres, including Plato's 'Parable of the Cave' and Jennifer Toth's The Mole People. Another aim was to contrast Gaiman's use of the 'beast in the sewer' metaphor with previous renditions of the myth, demonstrating how fantasy, paradoxically, offers a unique and privileged view of reality.

Mosakowski Institute

http://commons.clarku.edu/mosakowskiinstitute_gallery/1026/thumbnail.jpg

Being

Mixed Media/Mylar 72 x 42"

Wie effektiv sind systematische Rückmeldungen des Therapieverlaufs an den Therapeuten? Eine empirische Studie in einem stationär-verhaltenstherapeutischen Setting

Theoretischer Hintergrund: Die systematische Rückmeldung des Therapieverlaufs an den Therapeuten erwies sich in mehreren Studien an ambulant behandelten, überwiegend gering beeinträchtigten Patienten als effektives Mittel, um die Wirksamkeit psychotherapeutischer Behandlungen für potenziell problematische Patienten zu steigern. Fragestellung: Lassen sich diese Befunde auch in einem stationär-verhaltenstherapeutischen Setting replizieren und inwieweit sind sie wirklich auf misserfolgsgefährdete Patienten beschränkt? Methode: In einem randomisierten Gruppenvergleich (N = 118) erhielt die Hälfte der Therapeuten ein systematisches Feedback über den Therapieverlauf. Ergebnisse: Die Patienten in der Feedback-Bedingung verbesserten sich bei allen untersuchten Therapieerfolgsmaßen stärker als die Patienten der Kontrollgruppe. Schlussfolgerung: Ein systematisches Feedback des Therapieverlaufs an den Therapeuten führt zu einer Verbesserung der Effektivität stationär-verhaltenstherapeutischer Behandlungen. Zukünftige Forschung sollte nach Wegen suchen, die monetären und psychologischen Kosten von Feedbacksystemen zu reduzieren, um deren Einsatz in Settings der Routineversorgung zu erleichtern.