Navy aircraft carriers : cost-effectiveness of conventionally and nuclear-powered carriers : report to Congressional requesters /

"B-259298"--P. [1].

Department of Energy : DOE's nuclear safety enforcement program should be strengthened : report to the Chairman, Committee on Commerce, House of Representatives /

"B-282435"--P. 1.

Nuclear data : a collection of experimental values of half-lives, radiation energies, relative isotopic abundances, nuclear moments, and cross sections.

sup. 1. January to July 1950 -- sup. 2. July 1950 to January 1951 -- sup. 3. January to July 1951.

Nuclear powerplant standardization : light water reactors.

"April 1981" (v. 1); "June 1981" (v. 2)

Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR).

"5 February 1981."

Senate consideration of unratified treaties to limit nuclear testing.

Mode of access: Internet.

Illinois spent nuclear fuel transportation.

Mode of access: Internet.

Report on the atom; what you should know about the atomic energy program of the United States.

Mode of access: Internet.

TVA and the Clinch River breeder reactor project : hearing before the Subcommittee on Regional and Community Development of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, Ninety-eighth Congress, first session, April 20, 1983.

Includes bibliographical references.

Nuclear security : DOE's reinvestigation of employess has not been timely : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources, Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives /

"March 10, 1987."

Nuclear safety : concerns with nuclear facilities and other sources of radiation in the Former Soviet Union : report to the Honorable Bob Graham, U.S. Senate /

"B-261612"--P. 1.

Department of Energy's facilities for defense materials production : hearing before the Subcommittee on Energy Research and Development of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session, on the public health and safety and environmental aspects of operation ... July 17, 1987.

Pt. 2 has subtitle: Hearings before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session, on the status of the Department of Energy's effects to address issues concerning the defense materials production reactors ... October 27 and 29, 1987.

Department of Defense authorization for appropriations for fiscal years 1990 and 1991 : hearings before the Committee on Armed Services, United States Senate, One Hundred First Congress, first session, on S. 1085 ...

Item 1034-A, 1034-B (MF).

Nuclear security : safeguards and security weaknesses at DOE's weapons facilities : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives /

"B-246480"--p. 1.

A rogue is a rogue is a rogue: US foreign policy and the Korean nuclear crisis

Two nuclear crises recently haunted the Korean peninsula, one in 1993/4, the other in 2002/3. In each case the events-were strikingly similar: North Korea made public its ambition to acquire nuclear weapons and withdrew from the Nonproliferation Treaty. Then the situation rapidly deteriorated until the peninsular was literally on the verge of war. The dangers of North Korea's actions, often interpreted as nuclear brinkmanship, are evident. and much discussed, but not so the underlying patterns that have shaped the conflict in the first place. This article sheds light on some of them. It examines the role of the United States in the crisis, arguing that Washington's inability to see North Korea as anything but a threatening 'rogue state' seriously hinders both an adequate understanding and possible resolution of the conflict. Particularly significant is the current policy of pre-emptive strikes against rogue states, for it reinforces half a century of American nuclear threats towards North Korea. The problematic role of these threats has been largely obscured, not least because the highly technical discourse of security analysis has managed to present the strategic situation on the peninsula in a manner that attributes responsibility for the crisis solely to North Korea's actions, even if the situation is in reality far more complex and interactive.