Review of governance and accountability mechanisms in the General Medical Services schemes

Click here to download PDF

Governance von Universitätsbibliotheken : Optimierungsmöglichkeiten aus institutioneller Sicht

Ausgangspunkt der Arbeit bildet die Beobachtung, dass Universitäts­biblio­theken unterschiedliche Aufgaben zu Händen verschiedener Akteure erfüllen - so nehmen Universitätsbibliotheken in der Schweiz häufig Aufgaben einer Kantonsbibliothek wahr. Universitätsbibliotheken zeichnen sich durch unterschiedliche Rechts- und Organisationsformen aus, unterhalten Beziehungen zu Dritten und sind deshalb verschiedenen Instanzen zur Rechenschaft verpflichtet. Sie sind, schliesslich, in Zusammenschlüsse unterschiedlicher Natur eingebunden. Vor diesem Hintergrund wirft die vorliegende Arbeit die Frage nach der Steuerung des Unternehmens Universitätsbibliothek auf. Anhand ausgewählter Fallbeispiele wird aufgezeigt, wie sich unterschiedliche Governance-Modelle gestalten. Dabei wird insbesondere auf die Rechts- und Organisationsform, auf institutionelle Strukturen, auf Steuerungsinstrumente (Auftrag und finanzielle Rahmenbedingungen), auf institutionelle Beziehungen sowie auf die Autonomie der Bibliothek eingegangen. Darauf auf­bau­end werden Vor- und Nachteile der Modelle hinsichtlich der Erfüllung des Doppelauftrags (Universitäts- und Kantonsbibliothek) diskutiert. Es zeigt sich, dass Universitäts- und Kantonsauftrag komplementäre Funktionen darstellen, wobei allerdings vereinzelt Schwierigkeiten auftreten können. Die Rechts- und Organisationsform sowie, insbesondere, die Trägerschaft bilden ein zentrales Element im Hinblick auf die Auftragserfüllung. Gleichzeitig sind auch weitere Elemente zentral, beispielsweise Instrumente, welche nicht nur die Aufgaben, sondern die Zuständigkeiten der beteiligten Akteure festhalten. Parmi les nombreuses fonctions remplies par les bibliothèques universitaires en Suisse, celle de bibliothèque cantonale est la plus fréquente. Les formes juridiques et/ou d'organisation des bibliothèques universitaires suisses sont multiples ; les bibliothèques entretiennent des liens avec des tiers et elles sont, par conséquent, tenues de rendre des comptes à diverses instances. Comme toutes les bibliothèques, elles s'intègrent, finalement, à des réseaux de nature différente. Dans ce contexte, le présent travail soulève la question de la gouvernance de la bibliothèque universitaire. Il décrit, à partir d'exemples choisis, différents modèles de gouvernance en s'intéressant surtout à la forme juridique et/ou d'organisation, aux structures institutionnelles, aux instruments de gouvernance concernant la mission et les conditions cadres financières de la bibliothèque, aux relations institutionnelles et à l'autonomie de la bibliothèque. L'analyse permet ainsi une réflexion sur les avantages et les inconvénients des différents modèles de gouvernance au vu de la double mission universitaire et cantonale des bibliothèques. Le présent travail montre que les fonctions universitaires et cantonales sont à priori complémentaires et ne donnent lieu qu'à des difficultés mineures. La forme juridique et/ou d'organisation ainsi que l'autorité de tutelle constituent des éléments déterminants pour l'accomplissement de la (double) mission de la bibliothèque. Parallèlement, d'autres éléments jouent également un rôle important - par exemple, les instruments permettant non seulement de régler les tâches de la bibliothèque, mais aussi de déterminer les compétences de tous les acteurs intéressés.

Framework for Corporate and Financial Governance for Regulatory Bodies under the aegis of the Department of Health and Children

The document should be read as supplementary to existing requirements as set out both in statute â?" particularly legislation specific to your organisation, the Health Acts 1947-2004, Ombudsman Act, 1980, Data Protection Acts 1988 & 2003, Freedom of Information Acts 1997-2003, Ethics in Public Office Acts 1995 & 2001, Ombudsman for Children Act, 2002 and the Comptroller and Auditor General (Amendment) Act, 1993 – and in Government approved guidelines, including the Code of Practice for the Governance of State Bodies (2001), Public Financial Procedures, The Role and Responsibilities of Accounting Officers (2003) and Risk Management Guidance for Government Departments and Offices (2004). Read the report (PDF, 1.4mb)  

Framework for Corporate and Financial Governance for Agencies funded by the Department of Health and Children

Corporate governance is the system by which organisations direct and control their functions and relate to their stakeholders in order to manage their business, achieve their mission and objectives and meet the necessary standards of accountability, integrity and propriety. It is a key element in improving efficiency and accountability as well as enhancing openness and transparency. A significant element of the Governmentâ?Ts programme for health service reform is the strengthening of governance and accountability arrangements across the health system. Read the Report (PDF, 1mb)

The cognitive errors and coping patterns of child molesters as assessed by external observers: a pilot study

Cognitive errors (CE) and coping strategies (CS) are the focus of most cognitive-behavioral treatments for incarcerated child molesters. Several studies have reported differences in CEs and CSs between child molesters and controls. However, the vast majority of these studies assessed cognitive errors and coping using questionnaires, which are known to present a number of important limitations. This pilot study aimed to compare the CEs and CSs of N = 17 incarcerated child abusers and N = 12 controls using observer-rated methods, namely the Cognitive Error Rating Scale (CERS; Drapeau et al., 2005) and the Coping Action Pattern Rating Scale (CAPRS; Perry, Drapeau, & Dunkley, 2005). Results showed that child molesters presented more cognitive errors, in particular positive selective abstraction, and lower coping functioning, such as escape strategies. Treatment and research implications, including the use of observer-rated methods, are discussed.

2006 Drugs estimate refuels debate on governance, Issue 17, Spring 2006

In November 2005 €34.027 million was voted for the Drugs Initiative, which funds the local and regional drugs task forces, and the Young People’s Facilities and Services Fund (YPFSF), in 2006 – an 8 per cent increase on the allocation for 2005 and ‘well in excess of inflation’ according to the government. The community sector strongly criticised this estimate, calling for an additional €8 million to €15 million, to fund the projects identified following the creation of the Emerging Needs Fund in January 2005. In February 2006, the government revised its drugs estimate upwards by a further €8.979 million. As well as criticising the 2006 drugs estimate, the community sector raised a series of concerns with regard to governance – the rules, processes and behaviour that affect the way in which powers are exercised4 – or, in short, decision-making with regard to drugs policy in Ireland.This resource was contributed by The National Documentation Centre on Drug Use.

Three essays in Swiss corporate governance

This dissertation is a combination of three relatively independent chapters on the subject of corporate governance. Corporate governance is presently at the epicenter of the global financial crisis. The lack of regulation and the misalignment of objectives have greatly contributed to the major crisis we are now in. Most governance research has been conducted in the United States in a context of widely held corporations and great executive power. It does not reflect the variety of situations around the world and we question the validity of this model in other contexts. The aim of this dissertation is to look at other governance models, in particular the Swiss corporate governance not only from a practical point of view, but also from a multi-theoretical approach. Traditional corporate governance literature has focused on the Anglo-American model that mainly follows the agency theory (Jensen and Meckling, 1976) in a shareholder-manager context, and overlooked other approaches. We focus on three different aspects of corporate governance using three different theories. First, we look at the ownership type of various corporations, using the agency theory in a context where issues between shareholders predominate over the typical shareholder-manager relationship. Second, we explore the adoption process of several governance mechanisms that, due to changes in legislation, has taken place in Switzerland since 2002. We use the institutional theory (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983), in a context where the environmental pressures are particularly high. Finally, we spotlight the board of directors as a key element of the governance of publicly listed corporations. Particularly, we focus on the independence of the board of directors, using a combination of the agency and resource dependence theories (Pfeffer, 1972; Pfeffer and Salancik, 1978).

The Politics of Network Governance in Europe: The Case of Energy Regulation

Networks are considered increasingly important for policy-making. The literature on new modes of governance in Europe suggests that their horizontal coordination capacity and flexible and informal structures are particularly suitable for governing the multilevel architecture of the European polity. However, empirical evidence about the effects of networks on policy-making and public policies is still quite limited. This article uses the case of the European network of energy regulators to explore the determinants of the position of network members and, in turn, the domestic adoption of soft rules developed within this network. The empirical analysis, based on multivariate statistics and semi-directive interviews, supports the expectation that institutional complementarities increase actors' centrality in networks, while arguments based on organisational resources and age are disproved. Furthermore, results show that the overall level of adoption is considerable and that centrality might have a small positive effect on domestic adoption.

A new pathway for the regulation and governance of health research

The Academy's review, 'A new pathway for the regulation and governance of health research' was published in January 2011. The report was prepared by a working group, chaired by Professor Sir Michael Rawlins FMedSci, convened in response to an invitation from Government to review the regulation and governance of UK health research involving human participants, their tissue or their data.The report proposes four key principles that should underpin the regulation and governance framework around health research in the UK, and makes recommendations to:Create a new Health Research Agency (HRA) to rationalise the regulation and governance of all health research. Include within the HRA a new National Research Governance Service to facilitate timely approval of research studies by NHS Trusts. Improve the UK environment for clinical trials.Provide access to patient data that protects individual interests and allows approved research to proceed effectively. Embed a culture that values research within the NHS.

Research Governance Guidance Note 1

HSC Trust Research Governance Permission - Pre-application guidance for applicants

Research Governance Guidance Note 2

HSC Trust Research Governance Permission - Submission of Application

The "help" question doesn't help when screening for major depression: external validation of the three-question screening test for primary care patients managed for physical complaints.

BACKGROUND: Major depression, although frequent in primary care, is commonly hidden behind multiple physical complaints that are often the first and only reason for patient consultation. Major depression can be screened by two validated questions that are easier to use in primary care than the full DSM-IV criteria. A third question, called the "help" question, improves the specificity without apparently decreasing the sensitivity of this screening procedure. We validated the abbreviated screening procedure for major depression with and without the "help" question in primary care patients managed for a physical complaint. METHODS: This diagnostic accuracy study used data from a cohort study called SODA (for SOmatisation Depression Anxiety ) conducted by 24 general practitioners (GPs) in western Switzerland that included patients over 18 years of age with at least one physical complaint at index consultation. Major depression was identified with the full Patient Health Questionnaire. GPs were asked to screen patients for major depression with the three screening questions one year after inclusion. RESULTS: Out of 937 patients with at least one physical complaint, 751 were eligible one year after index consultation. Major depression was diagnosed in 69/724 (9.5%) patients. The sensitivity and specificity of the two-question method alone were 91.3% (95% confidence interval 81.4-96.4%) and 65.0% (95% confidence interval 61.2-68.6%), respectively. Adding the "help" question decreased the sensitivity (59.4% ; 95% confidence interval 47.0-70.9%) but improved the specificity (88.2% ; 95% confidence interval 85.4-90.5%) of the three-question method. CONCLUSIONS: The use of two screening questions for major depression was associated with high sensitivity and low specificity in primary care patients presenting a physical complaint. Adding the "help" question improved the specificity but clearly decreased the sensitivity; when using the "help" question; four out of ten patients with depression will be missed, compared to only one out of ten with the two-question method. Therefore, the "help" question is not useful as a screening question, but may help discussing management strategies.