Arquitectura modal o ensamblaje de repertorios, procesos y disposiciones

En muchas ocasiones se ha establecido una crítica sobre la excesiva disposicionalidad estética del arquitecto: el abuso subjetivista, un innatismo desligado del entorno socioambiental o su desafección hacia las necesidades y los requerimientos pertinentes del usuario final, buscando, principalmente, la objetivación cultural como expresión personal e individualista. Criticas que responden a un malestar persistente, que subyace a la práctica arquitectónica. En otras ocasiones se han ideado y propuesto tentativas o aproximaciones para la corrección y regulación de dicho “exceso”. En busca de la “pretendida objetividad”, éstas han recurrido a un pasado prístino, a una tradición inconsciente, colectiva e impersonal, a la ausencia de autoría, a lo artesanal y a lo vernáculo. También hacia un futuro tecnocrático: al mesianismo basado en la máquina, la ciencia, los métodos y el progreso tecnológico. La búsqueda de un lenguaje compartido, de un diseño sistemático y de una adecuación funcional han establecido nuevos excesos –repertoriales-, relegando la creatividad y la concepción estética a un plano casi inexistente, subordinándolo a variables de diseño externas a la autoría y la expresión subjetiva del diseñador. Esta tensión se ha saldado en una pugna de binomios categoriales que reducen la realidad a un dualismo aporético y contrapuesto, difícilmente superable. El propósito articulatorio de dichas posturas, en modelos ontológicos integrales, permite la incorporación de dichas categorías bajo estructuras y ensamblajes que despliegan los modos de relación, mediación y producción arquitectónicas. Estos ensamblajes combinan los distintos agentes –disposicionalidades- y sus repertorios en cada una de las fases del proceso arquitectónico, construyendo modos de acción y relación en base a los acoplamientos diferenciales, que devienen en técnicas y dinámicas de producción arquitectónica. Cada modo integrará diversas variables en base a los modelos propuestos -estratos, períodos y polos- y a la elección intencional –“situada”- de cada práctica: la Autonomía Modal Arquitectónica. El producto final de cada modo –o ensamblaje- será inconmensurable, estableciendo sistemas y métodos diversos para la práctica estética, sin que por ello esté garantizado el valor o éxito del resultado. ABSTRACT On many occasions an aesthetic criticism of the excessive disposition of the architect´s subjectivist abuse, innate posture detached from socioenvironmental issues or disaffection regarding the needs and requirements of who -or what- will finally use it has been brought up mainly in pursuit of a cultural objectification as a personal expression and an individualistic one. It is a criticism which goes hand in hand with a persistent uneasiness which is interwoven in the architectural practice. On other occasions we have seen ideas, attempts and approaches developed and proposed in order to correct, improve or adjust that so-called “excess”. In the search for this " expected objectivity" theorists have resorted to delving into a pristine past, an unconscious tradition both collective and personal, to the absence of authorship, regarding craft and vernacular. The pursuit of a common language, a systematic design and a functional adequacy has established new excesses -repertoires-, leaving behind creativity and aesthetic conception at an almost nonexistent level and subordinating it to variables outside the authoring design and subjective expression of the designer. This tension has resulted in a conflict between categorical binomial, which reduces reality to an aporetic and opposed dualism which is not easily overcome. The purpose of such articulatory positions in comprehensive ontological modals allows for the incorporation of those categories under structures and assemblies which display and unfold different models of relationship, mediation and production of architecture. These assemblies combine different agents - disposition - and their repertoires in each of the phases of the architectural process, building actions and relational modes based on the differential couplings, which become techniques and dynamics in architectural production. Each mode will integrate several variables within the proposed ontological models - strata, periods and poles - based on an intentional choice –“situated knowledge”- of each practice: Architectural Modal Autonomy. The final product of each mode -or assembly- will be immeasurable, establishing different systems and methods for aesthetic practice without the value or success of the outcome ever being guaranteed.

Architecture of a multi-modal dialogue system oriented to multilingual question-answering

In this paper, a proposal of a multi-modal dialogue system oriented to multilingual question-answering is presented. This system includes the following ways of access: voice, text, avatar, gestures and signs language. The proposal is oriented to the question-answering task as a user interaction mechanism. The proposal here presented is in the first stages of its development phase and the architecture is presented for the first time on the base of the experiences in question-answering and dialogues previously developed. The main objective of this research work is the development of a solid platform that will permit the modular integration of the proposed architecture.

Dynamic investigation of an ancient masonry bell tower with operational modal analysis: a non-destructive experimental technique to obtain the dynamic characteristics of a structure

This paper shows the results of an experimental analysis on the bell tower of “Chiesa della Maddalena” (Mola di Bari, Italy), to better understand the structural behavior of slender masonry structures. The research aims to calibrate a numerical model by means of the Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) method. In this way realistic conclusions about the dynamic behavior of the structure are obtained. The choice of using an OMA derives from the necessity to know the modal parameters of a structure with a non-destructive testing, especially in case of cultural-historical value structures. Therefore by means of an easy and accurate process, it is possible to acquire in-situ environmental vibrations. The data collected are very important to estimate the mode shapes, the natural frequencies and the damping ratios of the structure. To analyze the data obtained from the monitoring, the Peak Picking method has been applied to the Fast Fourier Transforms (FFT) of the signals in order to identify the values of the effective natural frequencies and damping factors of the structure. The main frequencies and the damping ratios have been determined from measurements at some relevant locations. The responses have been then extrapolated and extended to the entire tower through a 3-D Finite Element Model. In this way, knowing the modes of vibration, it has been possible to understand the overall dynamic behavior of the structure.

Neutrosophic and Modal Components of Relations in Complex Systems

Semiotic components in the relations of complex systems depend on the Subject. There are two main semiotic components: Neutrosophic and Modal. Modal components are alethical and deontical. In this paper the authors applied the theory of Neutrosophy and Modal Logic to Deontical Impure Systems.

Development of a systems risk methodology for single and multi-modal transportation systems. Final report.

Transportation Department, Research and Special Programs Administration, Washington, D.C.

Modal cities /

Includes bibliographical references.

Analysis of intercity modal split models. Final report.

Transportation Department, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Policy and International Affairs, Washington, D.C.

Trends in federal transportation financial activity, fiscal years 1970-1979 : report number 2, modal distribution of federal transportation obligations and outlays /

"April 1980."

How many meanings for ‘may’? The case for modal polysemy

The standard Kratzerian analysis of modal auxiliaries, such as ‘may’ and ‘can’, takes them to be univocal and context-sensitive. Our first aim is to argue for an alternative view, on which such expressions are polysemous. Our second aim is to thereby shed light on the distinction between semantic context-sensitivity and polysemy. To achieve these aims, we examine the mechanisms of polysemy and context-sensitivity and provide criteria with which they can be held apart. We apply the criteria to modal auxiliaries and show that the default hypothesis should be that they are polysemous, and not merely context-sensitive. We then respond to arguments against modal ambiguity (and thus against polysemy). Finally, we show why modal polysemy has significant philosophical implications.

Experimental modal analysis and dynamic component synthesis

Mode of access: Internet.