995 resultados para Whinfield, E. H. (Edward Henry), 1836-1922
Resumo:
Back Row: Irwin Uteritz, Meyer Paper, Homer Stryker, Alfred Schultz, Howard Liverance, Coach Ray Fisher, Carl Roby, Jack Blott, Henry Mudd
Front Row: John Shackleford, Adolph Klein, Milton Dixon, captain Ernie Vick, Robert Knode, Clark Wimbles, Harry Kipke</p>
Resumo:
Back Row: Irwin Uteritz, Meyer Paper, Homer Stryker, Alfred Schultz, Howard Liverance, Coach Ray Fisher, Carl Roby, Jack Blott, Henry Mudd,
Front Row: John Shackleford, Adolph Klein, Milton Dixon, captain Ernie Vick, Robert Knode, Clark Wimbles, Harry Kipke</p>
Resumo:
Back Row: mngr. Henry Stricker, Gilbert C. Ely, Charles Pearman, coach Edwin Mather
Front Row: :Howard Birks?, Harry Kipke, captain Walter Rae, Meyer Paper, James Miller
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Running title : Memoirs of my life and writing.
Resumo:
"This narrative ... appeared first ... in the pages of the 'Dublin university magazine'.".--Pref.
Resumo:
"Published by order of the Committee of Arrangement."
Resumo:
Report of the society for the year 1910 (3 p.) appended.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
In 3 parts: the 1st an abridgment of Geoffrey of Monmouth's "Historia Britonum": the 2d, a history of the Anglo-Saxon and Norman kings to the death of Henry III; the 3d, a history of the reign of Edward I. The language is a specimen of the French of Yorkshire. cf. Introd.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
A continuation of Bulwer's Life of Palmerston.
Resumo:
Australia’s Future Tax System Review, headed by the then head of the Australian Treasury, and the Productivity Commission’s Research Report on the not for profit sector, both examined the state of tax concessions to Australia’s not for profit sector in the light of the High Court’s decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Word Investments Ltd. Despite being unable to quantify with any certainty the pre- or post-Word Investments cost of the tax concessions, both Reports indicated their support for continuation of the income tax exemption. However, the government acted in the 2011 Budget to target the not for profit income tax concessions more precisely, mainly on competitive neutrality grounds. This article examines the income tax exemption by applying the five taxation design principles, proposed in the Australia’s Future Tax System Review, for assessing tax expenditure. The conclusion is that the exemptions can be justified and, further, that a rationale for the exemption can be consistent with the reasoning in the Word Investments case.