936 resultados para Vigarani, Lodovico, 17th century
Resumo:
Includes errata, last p.
Resumo:
Errata, last p.
Resumo:
A third volume was issued by Luigi Crespi, with title: Vite de' pittori bolognesi non descritte nella Felsina pittrice. Roma, 1769.
Resumo:
Published in fascicles between 1892 and 1899.
Resumo:
Errata, p. [192].
Resumo:
A fourth part appeared in 1628 with some 40 additional plates.
Resumo:
234-237 repeated in paging.
Resumo:
"Ḳunṭres" (41 leaves at end) has special t.p., dated 1698.
Resumo:
"E.L." was Eruand Lalayean, the moving force within Hayotsʻ Azgayin Ěnkerutʻiwn.
Resumo:
Includes index.
Resumo:
Engraved throughout. Architectural title leaf includes the arms of Cardinal Alessandro Farnese, to whom the work is dedicated, and the half-length port. of Vignola facing to the viewer's right. Plates are printed on one side of the leaf only, and are arranged in pairs on a verso and the facing recto. The 5 leaves at the end are from the series of 7 "Porte di Michel Angelo." Over 3 of the doorways are inscriptions relating to the Farnese.
Resumo:
Portrait plate of Francine by Abraham Bosse; other plates by Tavernier after Francine's designs.
Resumo:
Pt. 1 comprises added engraved title leaf, letterpress pages [1]-11, [12] (the last blank), 75 single-page engraved plates. The engraver was probably Melchior Tavernier, printer of the 1st ed.; see Mauban. Pt. 2 comprises etched title leaf, 9 single-page plates (numbered 1-8, 25), 22 double-page plates (numbered 9-24, 26-31). The etched title leaf is signed Le Pautre (i.e. Jean Le Pautre), and the 31 plates are by Jean Marot, whose signature appear on the 25th; see Mauban.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Many philosophers, especially in the wake of the 17th century, have favored an inegalitarian view of shape and color, according to which shape is mind-independent while color is mind-dependent. In this essay, I advance a novel argument against inegalitarianism. The argument begins with an intuition about the modal dependence of color on shape, namely: it is impossible for something to have a color without having a shape (i.e. without having some sort of spatial extension, or at least spatial location). I then argue that, given reasonable assumptions, inegalitarianism contradicts this modal-dependence principle. Given the plausibility of the latter, I conclude that we should reject inegalitarianism in favor of some form of egalitarianism—either a subjective egalitarianism on which both shape and color are mind-dependent or an objective egalitarianism on which both shape and color are mind-independent.