850 resultados para Iran-Iraq War, 1980-1988
Resumo:
Ur (deserted settlement), Iraq; shell, lapis lazuli, red limestone; set in bitumen
Resumo:
Ur (deserted settlement), Iraq; shell, lapis lazuli, red limestone; set in bitumen
Resumo:
Ur (deserted settlement), Iraq; 8 35/64 in.x 1 ft. 7 27/32 in.x 4 9/16 in.; shell, lapis lazuli, red limestone; set in bitumen
Resumo:
"HWRIC RR 030."
Resumo:
"PC80-2-1E."
Resumo:
"PHC80-E4."
Resumo:
"B-198027."
Resumo:
"In this Centennial year of Lincoln's birth, it has been deemed advisable to lay special emphasis upon the title of one of these tales, and therefore the collection has been renamed"--Verso of t.-p.
Resumo:
U.S. Olympic team, 1984, 1988, 1992, bronze medal in 3000 meter steeplechase, 1984
Resumo:
"Data series: HSB-80/86-2.0, HSB-80/86-2.1."
Resumo:
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2016-07
Resumo:
Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-06
Resumo:
There can be no doubt that the Murdoch press played an important role in cohering what support there was for Australia's involvement in 'Gulf War Two'. From the start, Murdoch's 'Australian' newspaper was firmly committed to the coalition of the willing and provided a well-orchestrated cheer squad for Prime Minister John Howard and the war against Iraq.
Resumo:
This article investigates the ethics of intervention and explores the decision to invade Iraq. It begins by arguing that while positive international law provides an important framework for understanding and debating the legitimacy of war, it does not cover the full spectrum of moral reasoning on issues of war and peace. To that end, after briefly discussing the two primary legal justifications for war (implied UN authorization and pre-emptive self-defence), and finding them wanting, it asks whether there is a moral 'humanitarian exceptions to this rule grounded in the 'just war' tradition. The article argues that two aspects of the broad tradition could be used to make a humanitarian case for war: the 'holy war' tradition and classical just war thinking based on natural law. The former it finds problematic, while the latter it argues provides a moral space to justify the use of force to halt gross breaches of natural law. Although such an approach may provide a moral justification for war, it also opens the door to abuse. It was this very problem that legal positivism from Vattel onwards was designed to address. As a result, the article argues that natural law and legal positivist arguments should be understood as complementary sets of ideas whose sometimes competing claims must be balanced in relation to particular cases. Therefore, although natural law may open a space for justifying the invasion of Iraq on humanitarian terms, legal positivism strictly limits that right. Ignoring this latter fact, as happened in the Iraq case, opens the door to abuse.