954 resultados para Current hosusehold survey


Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Prepared for the Cache River Joint Venture Partnership (JVP): Illinois Department of Natural Resources, The Nature Conservancy, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ducks Unlimited, Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

First ed. issued as its Special publication, no. 152.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Vols. for 1865-1876/77 have title: Report of the superintendent of the United States Coast Survey, showing the progress of the Survey during the year ...

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Latest issue consulted: Apr. 1996.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"September 2003"--P. ii.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Title from cover.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Issues for Dec. 1988, July 1989 distributed to depository libraries in microfiche.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Shipping list no.: 2003-0007-P.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background Mental health survey data are now being used proactively to decide how the burden of disease might best be reduced. Aims To study the cost-effectiveness of current and optimal treatments for mental disorders and the proportion of burden avertable by each. Method Data for three affective, four anxiety and two alcohol use disorders and for schizophrenia were compared in terms of cost, burden averted and efficiency of current and optimal treatment. We then calculated the burden unavertable given current knowledge. The unit of health gain was a reduction in the years lived with disability (YLDs). Results Summing across all disorders, current treatment averted 13% of the burden, at an average cost of AUS$30 000 per YLD gained. Optimal treatment at current coverage could avert 20% of the burden, at an average cost of AUS$18 000 per YLD gained. Optimal treatment at optimal coverage could avert 28% of the burden, at AUS$16 000 per YLD gained. Sixty per cent of the burden of mental disorders was deemed to be unavertable. Conclusions The efficiency of treatment varied more than tenfold across disorders. Although coverage of some of the more efficient treatments should be extended, other factors justify continued use of less-efficient treatments for some disorders. Declaration of interest None. Funding detailed in Acknowledgements.