715 resultados para Bipolar Disorder.
Resumo:
Valproic acid (2-propyl pentanoic acid) is a pharmaceutical drug used for treatment of epileptic seizures absence, tonic-clonic (grand mal), complex partial seizures, and mania in bipolar disorder [1]. Valproic acid is a slightly soluble in water and therefore as active pharmaceutical ingredient it is most commonly applied in form of sodium or magnesium valproate salt [1].However the list of adverse effects of these compounds is large and includes among others: tiredness, tremor, sedation and gastrointestinal disturbances [2]. Ionic liquids (ILs) are promising compounds as Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (APIs)[3]. In this context, the combinations of the valproate anion with appropriate cation when ILs and salts are formed can significantly alter valproate physical, chemical and thermal properties.[4] This methodology can be used for drug modification (alteration of drug solubility in water, lipids, bioavailability, etc)[2] and therefore can eliminate some adverse effect of the drugs related to drug toxicity due for example to its solubility in water and lipids (interaction with intestines). Herein, we will discuss the development of ILs based on valproate anion (Figure 1) prepared according a recent optimized and sustainable acid-base neutralization method [4]. The organic cations such as cetylpyridinium, choline and imidazolium structures were selected based on their biocompatibility and recent applications in pharmacy [3]. All novel API-ILs based on valproate have been studied in terms of their physical, chemical (viscosity, density, solubility) and thermal (calorimetric studies) properties as well as their biological activity.
Resumo:
Per a poder comprendre la dimensió de les possibles transformacions que Internet pot comportar, cal investigar els usos concrets de què es o ha estat objecte. En definitiva, cal realitzar investigacions empíriques que aportin informació sobre qui usa Internet, en quines circumstàncies i amb quins objectius. En aquest context, s’ha iniciat l’anàlisi en profunditat d’un cas específic de comunitat virtual de suport social creada per una persona afectada pel trastorn bipolar. L’objectiu d’una comunitat d’autoajuda virtual és proporcionar informació i recolzament emocional a través d’Internet. Mitjançant una metodologia qualitativa s’ha realitzat l’observació del fòrum virtual que penja de la pàgina web “Bipoloarweb.com”. En les investigacions del fenomen dels grups d’autoajuda a Internet, sovint s’ha destacat que a diferència dels grups ‘presencials’, aquests només poden aportar recolzament emocional i informatiu als seus membres. El tipus de recolzament instrumental o altre tipus d’assistència física, en canvi, no és possible en els casos virtuals. Els primers resultats de la recerca invaliden aquesta afirmació general ja que s’ha pogut observar episodis diferents d’ajut instrumental. En relació a la gestió d’informació i producció de coneixement, ja es pot avançar algunes qüestions interessants. En primer lloc, la quantitat i el detall de la informació que en el fòrum circula sobre el trastorn Bipolar. La majoria d’aquests coneixements, però, sorgeixen directament de compartir l’experiència diària entre els membres del grup. Tot això permet avançar la següent hipòtesi de treball pel futur: a més a més de suport emocional i instrumental, aquest grup ‘empodera’ el seus membres? Si la resposta fos positiva, el nostre cas tindria semblances amb altres fenòmens com son les associacions de malalts.
Resumo:
OBJECTIVE: Past traumatic events have been associated with poorer clinical outcomes in people with bipolar disorder. However, the impact of these events in the early stages of the illness remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate whether prior traumatic events were related to poorer outcomes 12 months following a first episode of psychotic mania. METHODS: Traumatic events were retrospectively evaluated from patient files in a sample of 65 participants who had experienced first episode psychotic mania. Participants were aged between 15 and 28 years and were treated at a specialised early psychosis service. Clinical outcomes were measured by a variety of symptomatic and functioning scales at the 12-month time-point. RESULTS: Direct-personal traumatic experiences prior to the onset of psychotic mania were reported by 48% of the sample. Participants with past direct-personal trauma had significantly higher symptoms of mania (p=0.02), depression (p=0.03) and psychopathology (p=0.01) 12 months following their first episode compared to participants without past direct-personal trauma, with medium to large effects observed. After adjusting for baseline scores, differences in global functioning (as measured by the Global Assessment of Functioning scale) were non-significant (p=0.05); however, participants with past direct-personal trauma had significantly poorer social and occupational functioning (p=0.04) at the 12-month assessment with medium effect. CONCLUSIONS: Past direct-personal trauma may predict poorer symptomatic and functional outcomes after first episode psychotic mania. Limitations include that the findings represent individuals treated at a specialist early intervention centre for youth and the retrospective assessment of traumatic events may have been underestimated.
Resumo:
The National Institute of Mental Health developed the semi-structured Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS) for the assessment of major mood and psychotic disorders and their spectrum conditions. The DIGS was translated into French in a collaborative effort of investigators from sites in France and Switzerland. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the French version have been established in a clinical sample in Lausanne. Excellent inter-rater reliability was found for schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, and unipolar schizoaffective disorder while fair inter-rater reliability was demonstrated for bipolar schizoaffective disorder. Using a six-week test-retest interval, reliability for all diagnoses was found to be fair to good with the exception of bipolar schizoaffective disorder. The lower test-retest reliability was the result of a relatively long test-retest interval that favored incomplete symptom recall. In order to increase reliability for lifetime diagnoses in persons not currently affected, best-estimate procedures using additional sources of diagnostic information such as medical records and reports from relatives should supplement DIGS information in family-genetic studies. Within such a procedure, the DIGS appears to be a useful part of data collection for genetic studies on major mood disorders and schizophrenia in French-speaking populations.
Resumo:
Aim: To investigate static and dynamic visuospatial working memory (VSWM) processes in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients and explore the validity of such measures as specific trait markers of schizophrenia. Methods: Twenty FEP patients and 20 age-, sex-, laterality- and education-matched controls carried out a dynamic and static VSWM paradigm. At 2-year follow up 13 patients met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (of Mental Health Disorders) - Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for schizophrenia, 1 for bipolar disorder, 1 for brief psychotic episode and 5 for schizotypal personality disorder. Results: Compared with controls, the 20 FEP patients showed severe impairment in the dynamic VSWM condition but much less impairment in the static condition. No specific bias in stimulus selection was detected in the two tasks. Two-year follow-up evaluations suggested poorer baseline scores on the dynamic task clearly differentiated the 13 FEP patients who developed schizophrenia from the seven who did not. Conclusions: Results suggest deficits in VSWM in FEP patients. Specific exploratory analyses further suggest that deficit in monitoring-manipulation VSWM processes, especially involved in our dynamic VSWM task, can be a reliable marker of schizophrenia.
Resumo:
The major mood disorders, which include bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder (MDD), are considered heritable traits, although previous genetic association studies have had limited success in robustly identifying risk loci. We performed a meta-analysis of five case-control cohorts for major mood disorder, including over 13,600 individuals genotyped on high-density SNP arrays. We identified SNPs at 3p21.1 associated with major mood disorders (rs2251219, P = 3.63 x 10(-8); odds ratio = 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.92), with supportive evidence for association observed in two out of three independent replication cohorts. These results provide an example of a shared genetic susceptibility locus for bipolar disorder and MDD.
Resumo:
Abstract : GABA, the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter, and its receptors play an important role in modulating neuronal activity in the central nervous system and are implicated in many neurological disorders. In this study, GABAA and GABAB receptor subunit expression was visualized by immunohistochemistry in human auditory areas TC (= primary auditory area), TB, and TA. Both hemispheres from nine neurologically normal subjects and from four patients with subacute or chronic stroke were included. In normal brains, GABAA receptor subunit (α1, α2, & β2/3) labeling produced neuropil staining throughout all cortical layers as well as labeling fibers and neurons in layer VI for all auditory areas. Densitometry profiles displayed differences in GABAA subunit expression between primary and non-primary areas. In contrast to the neuropil labeling of GABAA subunits, GABAB1 and GABAB2 subunit immunoreactivity was revealed on neuronal somata and proximal dendritic shafts of pyramidal and non-pyramidal neurons in layers II-III, more strongly on supra- than in infragranular layers. No differences were observed between auditory areas. In stroke cases, we observed a downregulation of the GABAA receptor α2 subunit in granular and infragranular layers, while the other GABAA and the two GABAB receptor subunits remained unchanged. Our results demonstrate a strong presence of GABAA and GABAB receptors in the human auditory cortex, suggesting a crucial role of GABA in shaping auditory responses in the primary and non-primary auditory areas. The differential laminar and area expression of GABAA subunits that we have found in the auditory areas and which is partially different from that in other cortical areas speaks in favor of a fine turning of GABA-ergic transmission in these different compartments. In contrast, GABAB expression displayed laminar, but not areal differences; its basic pattern was also very similar to that of other cortical areas, suggesting a more uniform role within the cerebral cortex. In subacute and chronic stroke, the selective GABAA α2 subunit downregulation is likely to influence postlesional plasticity and susceptibility to medication. The absence of changes in the GABAB receptors suggests different regulation than in other pathological conditions, such as epilepsy, schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, in which a downregulation has been reported. Résumé : GABA, le principal neurotransmetteur inhibiteur, et ses récepteurs jouent un rôle important en tant que modulateur de l'activité neuronale dans le système nerveux central et sont impliqués dans de nombreux désordres neurologiques. Dans cette étude, l'expression des sous-unités des récepteur GABAA et GABAB a été visualisée par immunohistochimie dans les aires auditives du cortex humains: le TC (= aire auditif primaire), le TB, et le TA. Les deux hémisphères de neuf sujets considérés normaux du point de vue neurologique et de quatre patients ayant subis un accident cérébro-vasculaire et se trouvant dans la phase subaiguë ou chronique étaient inclues. Dans les cerveaux normaux, les immunohistochimies contre les sous-unités α1, α2, & β2/3 du récepteur GABAA ont marqué le neuropil dans toutes les couches corticales ainsi que les fibres et les neurones de la couche VI dans toutes les aires auditives. Le profile densitométrique montre des différences dans l'expression des sous-unités du récepteur GABAA entre les aires primaires et non-primaires. Contrairement au marquage de neuropil par les sous-unités du recepteur GABAA, 1'immunoréactivité des sous-unités GABAB1 et GABAB2 a été révélée sur les corps cellulaires neuronaux et les dendrites proximaux des neurones pyramidaux et non-pyramidaux dans les couches II-III et est plus dense dans les couches supragranulaires que dans les couches infragranulaires. Aucune différence n'a été observée entre les aires auditives. Dans des cas lésionnels, nous avons observé une diminution de la sous-unité α2 du récepteur GABAA dans les couches granulaires et infragranulaires, alors que le marquage des autres sous-unités du récepteur GABAA et des deux sous-unités de récepteur GABAB reste inchangé. Nos résultats démontrent une présence forte des récepteurs GABAA et GABAB dans le cortex auditif humain, suggérant un rôle crucial du neurotransmetteur GABA dans la formation de la réponse auditive dans les aires auditives primaires et non-primaires. L'expression différentielle des sous-unités de GABAA entre les couches corticales et entre les aires auditives et qui est partiellement différente de celle observée dans d'autres aires corticales préconise une modulation fine de la transmission GABA-ergic en ces différents compartiments. En revanche, l'expression de GABAB a montré des différences laminaires, mais non régionales ; son motif d'expression de base est également très semblable à celui d'autres aires corticales, suggérant un rôle plus uniforme dans le cortex cérébral. Dans les phases subaiguë et chronique des accidents cérébro-vasculaires, la diminution sélective de la sous-unité α2 du recepteur GABAA est susceptible d'influencer la plasticité et la susceptibilité postlésionnelle au médicament. L'absence de changement pour les récepteurs GABAB suggère que le récepteur est régulé différemment après un accident cerebro-vasculaire par rapport à d'autres conditions pathologiques, telles que l'épilepsie, la schizophrénie ou le désordre bipolaire, dans lesquels une diminution de ces sous-unités a été rapportée.
Resumo:
Dr Van Hout has been invited by the ICASA network and IASP research team [Drs Geurt van de Glind; Trimbos Institute, The Netherlands; Dr Pieter-Jan Carpentier, ICASA; Josep Antoni Ramos-Quiroga, University of Barcelona, Spain, Professor Dr Frances Levin, University of Columbia, New York, USA and Professor Dr. Wim van den Brink, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands] to undertake the research protocol for Ireland as part of this European study of the prevalence of ADHD in adult patients referred for treatment of addiction problems. The research team at Waterford Institute of Technology, School of Health Sciences will undertake this national study as part of the International Collaboration on ADHD and Substance Abuse [ICASA] â?~International ADHD in Substance Use Disorders Prevalence Studyâ?T [IASP study]. The International Collaboration on ADHD and Substance Abuse [ICASA] will provide Dr Van Hout and her team with full support from ICASA of the measurement instruments available and a central database at the University of Amsterdam, and will undergo training for procedures for data capture from Dr van de Glind, Trimbos Institute, The Netherlands. Eight European countries (Norway, Sweden, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Spain, Switzerland and Hungary) USA and Australia have already participated in the first phase of the IASP study, which will close in September 2011. Over 2500 Substance Use Disorder [SUD] patients were sampled with approximately 38% scoring positive on the ADHD screener (ASRS). Of these 2500 patients over 1000 patients were evaluated on ADHD, Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Anti-Social Personality and Borderline Personality Disorder. A preliminary estimate of the prevalence of ADHD in SUD treatment seeking patients was recorded at 20 %. The second phase of study [IASP 2011] will commence in September 2011 for countries including Ireland, South Africa, Egypt and Brazil. Dr Van Hout has also been invited to partake in a systematic review paper on the risk factors for development of SUD in children/adolescents with ADHD in collaboration with the ICASA foundation.This resource was contributed by The National Documentation Centre on Drug Use.
Resumo:
This leaflet is for anyone who wants to know more about Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT).It discusses how it works, why it is used, its effects, its side-effects, and alternative treatments. If you can't find what you want here, there are sources of further information at the end of this leaflet. What is CBT? It is a way of talking about: ï,§ how you think about yourself, the world and other people ï,§ how what you do affects your thoughts and feelings. CBT can help you to change how you think ('Cognitive') and what you do ('Behaviour'). These changes can help you to feel better. Unlike some of the other talking treatments, it focuses on the 'here and now' problems and difficulties. Instead of focusing on the causes of your distress or symptoms in the past, it looks for ways to improve your state of mind now. When does CBT help? CBT has been shown to help with many different types of problems. These include: anxiety, depression, panic, phobias (including agoraphobia and social phobia), stress, bulimia, obsessive compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder and psychosis. CBT may also help if you have difficulties with anger, a low opinion of yourself or physical health problems, like pain or fatigue. How does it work? CBT can help you to make sense of overwhelming problems by breaking them down into smaller parts. This makes it easier to see how they are connected and how they affect you. These parts are: ï,§ A Situation - a problem, event or difficult situation. From this can follow: ï,§ Thoughts ï,§ Emotions ï,§ Physical feelings ï,§ Actions Each of these areas can affect the others. How you think about a problem can affect how you feel physically and emotionally. All these areas of life can connect like this: {5 Areas - click related link below} What happens in one of these areas can affect all the others. There are helpful and unhelpful ways of reacting to most situations, depending on how you think about it. The way you think can be helpful - or unhelpful. An example: If you go home feeling depressed, you'll probably brood on what has happened and feel worse. If you get in touch with the other person, there's a good chance you'll feel better about yourself. If you avoid the other person, you won't be able to correct any misunderstandings about what they think of you - and you will probably feel worse. This 'vicious circle' can make you feel worse. It can even create new situations that make you feel worse. You can start to believe quite unrealistic (and unpleasant) things about yourself. This happens because, when we are distressed, we are more likely to jump to conclusions and to interpret things in extreme and unhelpful ways. CBT can help you to break this vicious circle of altered thinking, feelings and behaviour. When you see the parts of the sequence clearly, you can change them - and so change the way you feel. CBT aims to get you to a point where you can 'do it yourself', and work out your own ways of tackling these problems. [For full factsheet â?" click on link above]This resource was contributed by the National Documentation Centre on Drug Use.
Resumo:
This leaflet is for members of the public who want to know more about mental illness, offending and substance misuse. We describe what is meant by mental disorder, offending and substance misuse and how often they are seen together. Also we will talk about treatments and other sources of help. We examine whether people with mental illness are more likely to commit violent crimes. Offending and mental health: Mental illness is sometimes called a â?~mental disorder¢?T. This includes schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, drug-induced psychosis, personality disorder, depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. These are just some examples of mental disorders. The branch of psychiatry dealing with the assessment and treatment of offenders with mental health problems is called â?~forensic psychiatryâ?T.This resource was contributed by The National Documentation Centre on Drug Use.
Resumo:
BACKGROUND: Topiramate (Topamax(R)) is an anti-epileptic drug of the sulfamate group used secondarily for bipolar disease. HISTORY AND SIGNS: One week after initiation of topiramate treatment for a bipolar disorder, a 57-year-old man presented with blurred vision. Clinical examination revealed a bilateral conjunctivitis, areflexic mydriasis, severe anterior chamber shallowing, with a myopic shift and vitritis. THERAPY AND OUTCOME: A spinal tap revealed an increased protein content of 1581 mg/L on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis, being compatible with a rupture of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). UBM exposed bilateral ciliochoroidal effusions with secondary angle-closure. Topiramate was promptly discontinued, whereas visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), and anterior and posterior segments anatomy normalized within 1 week. One month later, bilateral iris atrophy was present. CONCLUSION: The presence of BBB disruption with increased protein content in CSF with simultaneous blood ocular barrier breakdown may suggest a common inflammatory mechanism.
Resumo:
A long-standing tradition in personality research in psychology, and nowadays increasingly in psychiatry, is that psychotic and psychotic-like thoughts are considered common experiences in the general population. Given their widespread occurrence, such experiences cannot merely reflect pathological functioning. Moreover, reflecting the multi-dimensionality of schizotypy, some dimensions might be informative for healthy functioning while others less so. Here, we explored these possibilities by reviewing research that links schizotypy to favourable functioning such as subjective wellbeing, cognitive functioning (major focus on creativity) and personality correlates. This research highlights the existence of healthy people with psychotic-like traits who mainly experience positive schizotypy (but also affective features mapping onto bipolar disorder). These individuals seem to benefit from a healthy way to organise their thoughts and experiences, i.e. they employ an adaptive cognitive framework to explain and integrate their unusual experiences. We conclude that, instead of focussing only on the pathological, future studies should explore the behavioural, genetic, imaging and psychopharmacological correlates that define the healthy expression of psychotic-like traits. Such studies would inform on protective or compensatory mechanisms of psychosis-risk and could usefully inform us on the evolutionary advantages of the psychosis dimension.
Resumo:
Epidemiological studies have recognized a genetic diathesis for suicidal behavior, which is independent of other psychiatric disorders. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on suicide attempt (SA) and ideation have failed to identify specific genetic variants. Here, we conduct further GWAS and for the first time, use polygenic score analysis in cohorts of patients with mood disorders, to test for common genetic variants for mood disorders and suicide phenotypes. Genome-wide studies for SA were conducted in the RADIANT and GSK-Munich recurrent depression samples and London Bipolar Affective Disorder Case-Control Study (BACCs) then meta-analysis was performed. A GWAS on suicidal ideation during antidepressant treatment had previously been conducted in the Genome Based Therapeutic Drugs for Depression (GENDEP) study. We derived polygenic scores from each sample and tested their ability to predict SA in the mood disorder cohorts or ideation status in the GENDEP study. Polygenic scores for major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium were used to investigate pleiotropy between psychiatric disorders and suicide phenotypes. No significant evidence for association was detected at any SNP in GWAS or meta-analysis. Polygenic scores for major depressive disorder significantly predicted suicidal ideation in the GENDEP pharmacogenetics study and also predicted SA in a combined validation dataset. Polygenic scores for SA showed no predictive ability for suicidal ideation. Polygenic score analysis suggests pleiotropy between psychiatric disorders and suicidal ideation whereas the tendency to act on such thoughts may have a partially independent genetic diathesis. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Resumo:
Cumulative evidence indicates that neuropeptides play a role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Early data showed increased neuropeptide Y (NPY) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from schizophrenia patients and data from rodents show that antipsychotic drugs modulate NPY levels in and release from selected rat brain regions. In view of these findings we investigated whether the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine, originally used as an antipsychotic but subsequently shown to be efficient also in major depressive disorder and in both poles of bipolar disorder, would affect NPY-like immunoreactivity (-LI), and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)-LI levels in CSF of schizophrenia patients. NPY-LI and CRH-LI in CSF were determined in 22 patients with schizophrenia. Lumbar puncture was performed at baseline and again after 4 wk of quetiapine treatment (600 mg/d). Patients were assessed with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at baseline and at weekly intervals. Quetiapine treatment was associated with a significant increase in NPY-LI (p<0.001) and decrease in CRH-LI (p<0.01). Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that ΔNPY-LI and ΔCRH-LI levels predicted 63% (p<0.001) of the variability of the ΔPANSS total score, ΔNPY-LI 42% (p<0.05) of the ΔPANSS anxiety items (G2) and ΔCRH-LI 40% (p=0.05) of the ΔPANSS depression items (G6). These results suggest that while quetiapine's effects on monoamines are probably related to its antipsychotic properties, the modulation of NPY and CRH accounts for its antidepressant and anxiolytic effects and can be markers of response.
Resumo:
TERMINOLOGY AND PRINCIPLES OF COMBINING ANTIPSYCHOTICS WITH A SECOND MEDICATION: The term "combination" includes virtually all the ways in which one medication may be added to another. The other commonly used terms are "augmentation" which implies an additive effect from adding a second medicine to that obtained from prescribing a first, an "add on" which implies adding on to existing, possibly effective treatment which, for one reason or another, cannot or should not be stopped. The issues that arise in all potential indications are: a) how long it is reasonable to wait to prove insufficiency of response to monotherapy; b) by what criteria that response should be defined; c) how optimal is the dose of the first monotherapy and, therefore, how confident can one be that its lack of effect is due to a truly inadequate response? Before one considers combination treatment, one or more of the following criteria should be met; a) monotherapy has been only partially effective on core symptoms; b) monotherapy has been effective on some concurrent symptoms but not others, for which a further medicine is believed to be required; c) a particular combination might be indicated de novo in some indications; d) The combination could improve tolerability because two compounds may be employed below their individual dose thresholds for side effects. Regulators have been concerned primarily with a and, in principle at least, c above. In clinical practice, the use of combination treatment reflects the often unsatisfactory outcome of treatment with single agents. ANTIPSYCHOTICS IN MANIA: There is good evidence that most antipsychotics tested show efficacy in acute mania when added to lithium or valproate for patients showing no or a partial response to lithium or valproate alone. Conventional 2-armed trial designs could benefit from a third antipsychotic monotherapy arm. In the long term treatment of bipolar disorder, in patients responding acutely to the addition of quetiapine to lithium or valproate, this combination reduces the subsequent risk of relapse to depression, mania or mixed states compared to monotherapy with lithium or valproate. Comparable data is not available for combination with other antipsychotics. ANTIPSYCHOTICS IN MAJOR DEPRESSION: Some atypical antipsychotics have been shown to induce remission when added to an antidepressant (usually a SSRI or SNRI) in unipolar patients in a major depressive episode unresponsive to the antidepressant monotherapy. Refractoriness is defined as at least 6 weeks without meeting an adequate pre-defined treatment response. Long term data is not yet available to support continuing efficacy. SCHIZOPHRENIA: There is only limited evidence to support the combination of two or more antipsychotics in schizophrenia. Any monotherapy should be given at the maximal tolerated dose and at least two antipsychotics of different action/tolerability and clozapine should be given as a monotherapy before a combination is considered. The addition of a high potency D2/3 antagonist to a low potency antagonist like clozapine or quetiapine is the logical combination to treat positive symptoms, although further evidence from well conducted clinical trials is needed. Other mechanisms of action than D2/3 blockade, and hence other combinations might be more relevant for negative, cognitive or affective symptoms. OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER: SSRI monotherapy has moderate overall average benefit in OCD and can take as long as 3 months for benefit to be decided. Antipsychotic addition may be considered in OCD with tic disorder and in refractory OCD. For OCD with poor insight (OCD with "psychotic features"), treatment of choice should be medium to high dose of SSRI, and only in refractory cases, augmentation with antipsychotics might be considered. Augmentation with haloperidol and risperidone was found to be effective (symptom reduction of more than 35%) for patients with tics. For refractory OCD, there is data suggesting a specific role for haloperidol and risperidone as well, and some data with regard to potential therapeutic benefit with olanzapine and quetiapine. ANTIPSYCHOTICS AND ADVERSE EFFECTS IN SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS: Cardio-metabolic risk in patients with severe mental illness and especially when treated with antipsychotic agents are now much better recognized and efforts to ensure improved physical health screening and prevention are becoming established.