Sentencia de constitucionalidad condicionada. Caso sobre despenalización del aborto en Colombia (Jurisprudencia)

Este artículo se trata de un buen ejemplo de una sentencia de constitucionalidad condicionada, donde la Corte Constitucional de Colombia hizo una gran labor jurídica de explicar, una a una, las razones de su cambio de precedente en cuanto al aborto. Pues, por primera vez en cien años, se da la posibilidad a las mujeres colombianas que decidan qué hacer frente a un embarazo. Este artículo pretende un análisis sobre el tipo de sentencia que produjo la Corte Constitucional, sobre valores o principios que entraron en juego, la clase de interpretación que se realizó, para finalmente hacer una reflexión crítica del caso.

Deber judicial de resolución y casos difíciles (Tema Central)

Resolver por parte de los operadores jurídicos y en los casos en los que el derecho aplicable es indeterminado, con mecanismos y técnicas que son asimismo imprecisas, genera ciertas consecuencias: en estos supuestos los jueces no cuentan con criterios nítidos que guíen su toma de decisiones. dado que la extensión de lo indeterminado es indeterminada, la indeterminación es ineliminable no solo del contenido de las reglas jurídicas sino también de los recursos y mecanismos interpretativos del derecho. Así sucede en los “casos difíciles”, en los que el “deber de resolución” que impone a los jueces el Estado de derecho deviene impreciso y de realización incierta.

Responsabilidad de dar cuenta del desempeño de la función jurisdiccional (Tema Central)

En esta presentación abordaré tres asuntos, fundamentalmente. la primera cuestión a la que quisiera referirme es la de por qué dar cuenta, que en ocasiones puede considerarse obvia pero no lo es tanto, el segundo punto enfocará los contenidos respecto a los cuales quien ejerce una función jurisdiccional debe dar cuenta, finalmente, abordaré el asunto de la trascendencia o relevancia que socialmente alcanzan el cumplir y el incumplir con esta responsabilidad. Una puntualización aclaratoria: cuando me refiero a quienes ejercen función jurisdiccional, incluyo en ello tanto a jueces como a fiscales. Aunque en esta reunión se enfoca específicamente el caso de los jueces, dado que los integrantes del Ministerio Público también ejercen función jurisdiccional –especialmente en el caso de aquellos países donde se ha introducido el proceso penal reformado–, el abordaje del tema que propongo también los comprende.

Las garantías de los derechos en las constituciones de Bolivia y Ecuador (Tema Central)

Las recientemente promulgadas constituciones ecuatoriana y boliviana imponen nuevos paradigmas en lo que concierne a la interpretación y aplicación de los derechos fundamentales, y como no podía ser de otra manera, lo hacen igualmente con respecto a las garantías que los tutelan. Este artículo analiza las tensiones que se generan en la denominada aplicación directa de la Constitución y sus significaciones en el plano operativo (obligaciones para jueces y demás autoridades y funcionarios públicos), realiza un estudio de las garantías jurisdiccionales en Ecuador en comparación con las previstas en Bolivia, y advierte de los peligros que implica una interpretación errada de la naturaleza de estas acciones.

Sentencia de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador sobre la constitucionalidad de la obligación del afianzamiento tributario (Jurisprudencia)

Los sujetos pasivos que impugnen ante la vía judicial un acto administrativo mediante el cual se pretenda determinar o recaudar tributos, deben rendir una caución equivalente al 10% de la cuantía de su demanda, de no presentársela en el término de quince días, el acto impugnado queda ejecutoriado y los jueces deben ordenar el archivo del proceso. Nuestra Corte Constitucional para el Período de Transición considera que no se vulnera derecho alguno en ese caso, siempre y cuando se exija rendir la caución después de calificada la demanda. Estudiaremos los fundamentos que tuvo la Corte Constitucional para llegar a esa conclusión. Pretenderemos analizarlos y cuestionarlos objetivamente, para así demostrar por qué su falta de coherencia y de sustento permite concluir que su análisis pecó por falto de imparcialidad, y por qué es razonable suponer que sus móviles no fueron jurídicos en lo absoluto, sin perjuicio de que, a la par, demos nuestro parecer al respecto. Independientemente de la trascendencia jurídica que puedan o no tener en nuestro ordenamiento, esperamos se entienda por qué creemos que estos precedentes deben ser considerados como un capítulo funesto en la historia de la jurisprudencia constitucional ecuatoriana.

Análisis del fallo de la Sala Especializada de lo Contencioso Tributario de la Corte Nacional de Justicia, dictado dentro del recurso No. 188-2010, referente a la legalidad de la Tasa por Servicios de Seguridad Ciudadana (Jurisprudencia)

El presente trabajo tiene por objeto analizar la sentencia emitida por la Sala de lo Contencioso Tributario de la Corte Nacional de Justicia, relativa a la impugnación de la legalidad de la “Tasa de Seguridad ciudadana”, que aplica el Municipio del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito. Fallo controversial en que se decidió desechar la demanda por caducidad del derecho para la impugnación, toda vez, que a criterio de los juzgadores ha transcurrido más de tres años desde que la referida tasa entró en vigencia. Con tal propósito, se examina críticamente los fundamentos sobre los cuales la Sala decidió desechar la demanda, así mismo, se establece los parámetros de orientación sobre cuál pudo ser el contenido de un pronunciamiento conforme con la Constitución y leyes vigentes.

La protección del patrimonio cultural en cinco elogiosas piezas jurisprudenciales de Argentina (Tema Central)

The aim is to discuss the main legal criteria developed in Argentina in regard to cultural and architectural heritage protection through the analysis of five court decisions and their main protection techniques. The goal is to raise awareness about the critical role of civil society in the protection and promotion of heritage and cultural values. The attempt is to highlight the importance of judge’s active role as a major figure in the field.

El control de convencionalidad y la protección del derecho a la propiedad privada a partir de la sentencia del caso Salvador Chiriboga vs. Ecuador (Tema Central)

The contents of this article analyze the right to private property after the decision of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the case “Salvador Chiriboga vs. Ecuador”. The author´s concern is the fact that this case represents the most expensive sentence inside the Inter-American protection system due to the violation of the right to private property (art. 21.2 AC); judicial guarantees (art. 8.1 AC) and judicial protection (art. 25.1 CA). This subject has special relevance since Ecuador is facing a judicial reform process and it is necessary to consider that the diffusion of this decision among judges could prevent the commission of the same mistakes; specially, those related to denial of justice as it occurred in the present case study.

Turing Test: Mindless Game?

The Turing Test, originally configured for a human to distinguish between an unseen man and unseen woman through a text-based conversational measure of gender, is the ultimate test for thinking. So conceived Alan Turing when he replaced the woman with a machine. His assertion, that once a machine deceived a human judge into believing that they were the human, then that machine should be attributed with intelligence. But is the Turing Test nothing more than a mindless game? We present results from recent Loebner Prizes, a platform for the Turing Test, and find that machines in the contest appear conversationally worse rather than better, from 2004 to 2006, showing a downward trend in highest scores awarded to them by human judges. Thus the machines are not thinking in the same way as a human intelligent entity would.

Hidden interlocutor misidentification in practical Turing Tests

Based on insufficient evidence, and inadequate research, Floridi and his students report inaccuracies and draw false conclusions in their Minds and Machines evaluation, which this paper aims to clarify. Acting as invited judges, Floridi et al. participated in nine, of the ninety-six, Turing tests staged in the finals of the 18th Loebner Prize for Artificial Intelligence in October 2008. From the transcripts it appears that they used power over solidarity as an interrogation technique. As a result, they were fooled on several occasions into believing that a machine was a human and that a human was a machine. Worse still, they did not realise their mistake. This resulted in a combined correct identification rate of less than 56%. In their paper they assumed that they had made correct identifications when they in fact had been incorrect.

Could the presumption of innocence protect the guilty?

At criminal trial, we demand that those accused of criminal wrongdoing be presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond any reasonable doubt. What are the moral and/or political grounds of this demand? One popular and natural answer to this question focuses on the moral badness or wrongness of convicting and punishing innocent persons, which I call the direct moral grounding. In this essay, I suggest that this direct moral grounding, if accepted, may well have important ramifications for other areas of the criminal justice process, and in particular those parts in which we (through our legislatures and judges) decide how much punishment to distribute to guilty persons. If, as the direct moral grounding suggests, we should prefer under-punishment to over-punishment under conditions of uncertainty, due to the moral seriousness of errors which inappropriately punish persons, then we should also prefer erring on the side of under-punishment when considering how much to punish those who may justly be punished. Some objections to this line of thinking are considered.

Prizes for modernity in the provinces: The Arts Council’s 1950-1951 regional playwriting competition

As part of its contribution to the 1951 Festival of Britain, the Arts Council ran what can be seen in retrospect to be an important playwriting competition. Disregarding the London stage entirely, it invited regional theatres throughout the UK to put forward nominations for new plays within their repertoire for 1950-1951. Each of the five winning plays would receive, what was then, the substantial sum of £100. Originality and innovation featured highly amongst the selection criteria, with 40 per cent of the judges’ marks being awarded for “interest of subject matter and inventiveness of treatment”. This article will assess some of the surprising outcomes of the competition and argue that it served as an important nexus point in British theatrical historiography between two key moments in post-war Britain: the first being the inauguration of the Festival of Britain in 1951, the other being the debut of John Osborne’s Look Back in Anger in May 1956. The article will also argue that the Arts Council’s play competition was significant for two other reasons. By circumventing the London stage, it provides a useful tool by which to reassess the state of new writing in regional theatre at the beginning of the 1950s and to question how far received views of parochialism and conservatism held true. The paper will also put forward a case for the competition significantly anticipating the work of George Devine at the English Stage Company, which during its early years established a reputation for itself by heavily exploiting the repertoire of new plays originally commissioned by regional theatres. This article forms part of a five year funded Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) project, ‘Giving Voice to the Nation: The Arts Council of Great Britain and the Development of Theatre and Performance in Britain 1945-1994’. Details of the Arts Council’s archvie, which is housed at the Victoria & Albert Museum in London can be found at http://www.vam.ac.uk/vastatic/wid/ead/acgb/acgbf.html Keywords: Arts Council of Great Britain, regional theatre, playwriting, Festival of Britain, English Stage Company (Royal Court) , Yvonne Mitchell

Some implications of a sample of practical Turing tests

A series of imitation games involving 3-participant (simultaneous comparison of two hidden entities) and 2-participant (direct interrogation of a hidden entity) were conducted at Bletchley Park on the 100th anniversary of Alan Turing’s birth: 23 June 2012. From the ongoing analysis of over 150 games involving (expert and non-expert, males and females, adults and child) judges, machines and hidden humans (foils for the machines), we present six particular conversations that took place between human judges and a hidden entity that produced unexpected results. From this sample we focus on features of Turing’s machine intelligence test that the mathematician/code breaker did not consider in his examination for machine thinking: the subjective nature of attributing intelligence to another mind.

Human misidentification in Turing tests

This paper presents some important issues on misidentification of human interlocutors in text-based communication during practical Turing tests. The study here presents transcripts in which human judges succumbed to theconfederate effect, misidentifying hidden human foils for machines. An attempt is made to assess the reasons for this. The practical Turing tests in question were held on 23 June 2012 at Bletchley Park, England. A selection of actual full transcripts from the tests is shown and an analysis is given in each case. As a result of these tests, conclusions are drawn with regard to the sort of strategies which can perhaps lead to erroneous conclusions when one is involved as an interrogator. Such results also serve to indicate conversational directions to avoid for those machine designers who wish to create a conversational entity that performs well on the Turing test.

Effects of lying in practical Turing tests

Interpretation of utterances affects an interrogator’s determination of human from machine during live Turing tests. Here, we consider transcripts realised as a result of a series of practical Turing tests that were held on 23 June 2012 at Bletchley Park, England. The focus in this paper is to consider the effects of lying and truth-telling on the human judges by the hidden entities, whether human or a machine. Turing test transcripts provide a glimpse into short text communication, the type that occurs in emails: how does the reader determine truth from the content of a stranger’s textual message? Different types of lying in the conversations are explored, and the judge’s attribution of human or machine is investigated in each test.