Tutorial Moodle: Tarefa Arquivo Único

Este tutorial é para a versão Moodle 1.9.17.

Polimorfismos de nucleotídeo único (SNPS) dos genes PPARy2, lipase lipoproteica, receptor de LDL, apolipoproteina C3, e adiponectina podem modular o perfil lipídico de pacientes com a síndrome de Berardinelli-Seip

A Síndrome de Berardinelli-Seip (SBS) é um distúrbio raro do metabolismo dos lipídios, caracterizada pela ausência quase total de tecido adiposo subcutâneo, hipertrigliceridemia, hipoleptinemia e diabetes insulino resistente ou lipoatrófico. Sua etiologia envolve implicações hipotalâmicas, alterações nos receptores de insulina e mutações nos genes AGPAT2, Gng3lg, CAV1 e PTRF. O tecido adiposo secreta diversas substâncias, tais como: leptina, resistina, adiponectina, esteróides, TNF , IL-6, PAI-1, angiotensinogênio, IGF-1. Muitas delas estão associadas ao diabetes mellitus tipo 2, obesidade e hipertensão. Os PPARs são fatores transcricionais pertencentes à superfamília de receptores nucleares ligantes ativados. Sabe-se que o PPAR , é importante para o metabolismo lipídico e glicídico e que o ligante natural do PPAR é derivado do ácido graxo. Nesse sentido, foram avaliados 24 pacientes portadores da SBS, provenientes do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, com a mediana das idades de 18,5 anos (0,55 a 47 a), sendo 9 (37,5 %) do gênero masculino e 15 (62,5 %) do gênero feminino. Quanto ao grupo étnico, foram classificados em caucasóides (brancos) 21 (87,5 %) e negróides 3 (12,5 %) pacientes. Foram feitas avaliações clínico-endocrinológica, bioquímica, hormonal, molecular e o estudo dos polimorfismos Adiponectina ADIPOQ, PPARγ2 Pro12Ala, LPL-PvuII, APOC3-SstI e LDLR-AvaII em portadores da SBS. Nesta população nós não encontramos nenhuma associação de parâmetros lipídicos e glicídicos com os polimorfismos LPL-PvuII, APOC3-SstI e LDLR-AvaII. Porém, observamos associação entre Adiponectina ADIPOQ e PPARγ2 Pro12Ala e níveis lipídicos mais elevados, sugerindo um papel biológico para estes fatores, indicando estudos mais aprofundados

Doença cardiovascular em mulheres com histórico de pré-eclâmpsia e seguimento no sistema único de saúde

The aim of the present study was to analyze cardiovascular risk of women with a history of preeclampsia, as well as its follow-upin the National Health System.This is a cross-sectional quantitative research conducted at the Januário Cicco Maternity School. The study population was composed of 573 women selected from a databank belonging to the Women s Health Research Group of the Gynecology Department at Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, with a history of preeclampsia, and normotensives who gave birth at this institution five years before. The final sample consisted of 147 women, 64 in the group with a history of PE and 83 normotensives. Data were collected on a questionnaire containing the following: sociodemographic aspects, anthropometric measures, life habits, personal and family history of pregnancy-induced hypertension, family history of cardiovascular diseases and frequency of measuring current blood pressure levels. In relation to the association between cardiovascular risk and altered blood pressure (≥130x85 mmHg), the likelihood of exhibiting the latter condition was significantly higher in women with a history of preeclampsia (CI 95% 4.12-38.92), the overweight and obese (CI 95% 1.70-20.75), and in those with a family historyof CVD and personal history of PIH (CI 95% 0.78-47.07 and CI 95% 3.20-25.39) respectively. Likewise, the probability of having altered blood pressure was higher in women with fasting glycemia ≥100mg/dL (CI 95% 2.09-24.73), as well as in those with triglycerides ≥150mg/dl (CI 95% 1.72-9.66). After fitting the logistic model, diagnosis previous preeclampsia and altered triglycerides remained as explanatory variables.The women with a history of preeclampsia five years before exhibited altered blood pressure levels, clinical and laboratory manifestations suggestive of elevated risk for cardiovascular disease, as well as family and personal history of hypertension. There is no differential treatment or adequate outpatient follow-up for this population in basic health care units

Fisioterapia e sociedade: ações do Sistema Único de Saúde no Rio Grande do Norte

The work has objective to present actions of Physiotherapy, developed by SUS in the State of Rio Grande do Norte; discuss under the humanization point of view such actions of health; discuss the importance of physioterapy to the Norte-Riograndense, or maybe its role in the perpetuation of actions of health centered in the binomial cause/efect. The study was done in the State of Rio Grande do Norte. The data were obtained through public sources gathered in the health secretrary ship of this State. The collected data talks about physiotherapy sections developed by SUS in several areas of the State; such data was collected and analysed after the aproval of Ethic and Resarch Committee of Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte. Concerning the physiotherapy, along with the State Health Secretaryship of the State fo Rio Grande do Norte, there were only records of attending based on cure/rehabillitation, not being observed during the curse of study, any record or action of prevention, promotion and protection towards health. It s possible to notice that there is a highligth to the interventions focusing on the treatment of illness of rheumatic origin and general complaints related to the vertebral column. Such research evidenced that the Physiotherapy in the SUS in the State priorizes the individualized attending centered in the carteziano health/illness model, where the developde actions are turned to the curative and rehabilliting attention, with role fo some or no highligth in the primary attention

Max Stirner, o único e o que lhe é próprio: uma interpretação e(m) algun(s) ensaio(s)

This work has a study object the main thinking work of Johan Kaspar Schmidt well known as Max Stirner (1806-1856) - originally titled (in German), Der Einzige und sein Eigentun, and translated into Portuguese by the Portuguese publisher Antígona in 2004, under the title The Unique and its Ownership. This book was known in 1844 although its publication dated 1845 seen that the censor of that time rejected the publication request in that year - saying that ( ) in concrete passages of that work, not only God, Christ, the church and the religion are usually object of proposal blasphemy, but also because all social order, the state and the government are defined as something that should not exist simultaneously as one justifies the lie, perjury, the murder and suicide and denies the ownership right. After this first attack and rejection by its bearing the unique come to be others target, due practically to all the philosophical political thinkers its time including thinkers like Ludwig Feuerbach and Karl Marx & Friedrich Engels in spite of, on the other hand, having inspired formulations and reformulations of many of those thinkers that were against then in their times, as well as those thinkers that came after then such as Nietzsche himself. Even though this work was be victim of powerful attempts of erasing it of history, it has shown a great repercussion power and that is the main reason that led us to ask the following questions what is its big originality? , how could his author arrive at a so impactant perspective? What is its most legitimate political place? We endeavored in elaborate answers to those questions trough the exegesis of its text, taking in account both the scholarship environment where the author produced his intellectual life set - and the detailed reading of texts linked to discussion in focus, where this reading is always based upon the meaning and senses traced by the texts and its contexts as a precaution against the limits and the traps of the readings which shed light markedly on strict letter of the phrases constructs. Ours conclusions point at to the idea that a work like this , that subverts the characteristic ways of thought of the modernity, completely, continues being a utter odds, without rank in the history of thought and the moderns political practices, finding parallel possibility only, in a very special way, with a certain autharchic perspective of Ancient Greece