836 resultados para critical and ethical thinking
Resumo:
Reply to Louis Hue Girardin's "Pulaski vindicated from an unsupported charge inconsiderately or malignantly introduced in Judge Johnson's Sketches of the life and correspondence of Major Gen. Nathaniel Greene."
Resumo:
"A key to the classical pronunciation ... New-York [n.d.]": (103 p. at end)
Resumo:
Satirical notes ostensibly by Warburton and others.
Resumo:
The book of good counsels, selected from the Hitopadesa; translated from the Sanscrit by Sir E. Arnold.--Nala and Damayanti, selected from the Mahabharata"; translation by Sir E. Arnold.--Selections from the Ramayana by Yalmiki, metrical translation by R.T.H. Griffiths.--Sakoontala, by Kalidasa; translation by Sir M. Monier-Williams--Ballads of Hindosian, miscellaneous poems by Toru Dutt.
Resumo:
"First edition 1893."
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Includes some text in French.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Map on lining-paper.
Resumo:
Objective: To review the policy and ethical implications of recent research on the molecular genetics of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Method: MEDLINE and psycINFO database searches were used to identify studies on the genetics of ADHD. The implications of replicated candidate genes are discussed. Results: The findings for most genes have been inconsistent but several studies have implicated the genes in the dopaminergic pathway in the aetiology of ADHD. Conclusions: The current evidence on the genetics of ADHD is insufficient to justify genetic screening tests but it will provide important clues as to the aetiology of ADHD. Genetic information on susceptibility to ADHD has the potential to be abused and to stigmatize individuals. Researchers and clinicians need to be mindful of these issues in interpreting and disseminating the results of genetic studies of ADHD.
Resumo:
This article analyses the way newspapers and journalists sometimes fail to acknowledge and resolve some of the contentious ethical dilemmas associated with reporting news. Its focus is on not exploiting and vilifying the vulnerable, especially people with mental illness, through sensationalism and inaccurate and imprecise use of medical terminology such as "psycho ". "schizo" or "lunatic ". Because ethics is central to our understanding of professionalism, this article uses professions and professionalism as benchmarks aginst which to analyse and critique how journalists and newspapers define and report news.Sometimes journalists fail the test of good ethical practice in terms of negative. outdated and inaccurate expressions they use in the news stories they report. Likewise, regulators of news industry standards appear not to recognize and sanction such reporting. The apparent inability to resolve these ethical dilemmas creates a context conducive to tolerance for, not acceptance of. unethical news reporting.