787 resultados para Literature review and systematisation
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Vols. 4-20 are called "New ser., v. 1-17;" v. 21-34, "New ser., v. 18-31, old ser., v. 21-34."
Resumo:
Title from caption.
Resumo:
Editors: 1845-47, G.H. Colton.--1848-49? J.D. Whelpley
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Title from caption.
Resumo:
"IEPA/WPC/84-001."-- Cover.
Resumo:
"SWS Contract report 429." -- Cover.
Resumo:
New ser., v. 1, has imprint: London, Printed for the editor, and sold by T. Hurst, 1799.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
"May 1994."
Resumo:
Due to its wide applicability and ease of use, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been studied extensively for the last 20 years. Recently, it is observed that the focus has been confined to the applications of the integrated AHPs rather than the stand-alone AHP. The five tools that commonly combined with the AHP include mathematical programming, quality function deployment (QFD), meta-heuristics, SWOT analysis, and data envelopment analysis (DEA). This paper reviews the literature of the applications of the integrated AHPs. Related articles appearing in the international journals from 1997 to 2006 are gathered and analyzed so that the following three questions can be answered: (i) which type of the integrated AHPs was paid most attention to? (ii) which area the integrated AHPs were prevalently applied to? (iii) is there any inadequacy of the approaches? Based on the inadequacy, if any, some improvements and possible future work are recommended. This research not only provides evidence that the integrated AHPs are better than the stand-alone AHP, but also aids the researchers and decision makers in applying the integrated AHPs effectively.
Resumo:
Supplier evaluation and selection problem has been studied extensively. Various decision making approaches have been proposed to tackle the problem. In contemporary supply chain management, the performance of potential suppliers is evaluated against multiple criteria rather than considering a single factor-cost. This paper reviews the literature of the multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection. Related articles appearing in the international journals from 2000 to 2008 are gathered and analyzed so that the following three questions can be answered: (i) Which approaches were prevalently applied? (ii) Which evaluating criteria were paid more attention to? (iii) Is there any inadequacy of the approaches? Based on the inadequacy, if any, some improvements and possible future work are recommended. This research not only provides evidence that the multi-criteria decision making approaches are better than the traditional cost-based approach, but also aids the researchers and decision makers in applying the approaches effectively.