Pachycondyla obscuricornis as natural enemy of the spittlebug Deois flavopicta

The objective of this work was to evaluate the potential control of the ant Pachycondyla obscuricornis Emery (Hymenoptera Formicidae) on populations of nymphs of the spittlebug, Deois flavopicta Stal (Hemiptera Cercopidae). Foraging behavior and prey consumption rate of P. obscuricornis were evaluated. Field data revealed that P. obscuricornis does not show aggressive behavior against individuals of the same species, when they are not carrying a prey; they can patrol distances larger than 10 m searching for prey, and they can build their nest as close as 1 m from each other. The ant has a solitary patrolling habit, there is no recruitment behavior, and individuals dislocate fast, browsing on soil and vegetation for prey. Predation rate on spittlebug nymphs increased relative to the spittlebug abundance, reaching 93.8% of captured prey. Pachycondyla obscuricornis is a voracious predator and may control the population of spittlebugs in cultivated pastures.

8

This chapter looks at the place of the Gothic in Batman's history and current revival via the Nolan films. It examines the specificity of comic book characters, which exist in a wide variety of texts, forms and media, and focuses on the way that Batman has oscillated between light and dark versions while always returning to the Gothic as a means of commercial reanimation when the franchise seems to wane.

An Improved Hybrid Model for the Generic Hoist Scheduling Problem

Peer-reviewed

An international validation study of the EORTC brain cancer module (EORTC QLQ-BN20) for assessing health-related quality of life and symptoms in brain cancer patients.

Aims: The psychometric properties of the EORTC QLQ-BN20, a brain cancer-specific HRQOL questionnaire, have been previously determined in an English-speaking sample of patients. This study examined the validity and reliability of the questionnaire in a multi-national, multi-lingual study. Methods: QLQ-BN20 data were selected from two completed phase III EORTC/NCIC clinical trials in brain cancer (N=891), including 12 languages. Experimental treatments were surgery followed by radiotherapy (RT) and adjuvant PCV chemotherapy or surgery followed by concomitant RT plus temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy. Standard treatment consisted of surgery and postoperative RT alone. The psychometrics of the QLQ-BN20 were examined by means of multi-trait scaling analyses, reliability estimation, known groups validity testing, and responsiveness analysis. Results: All QLQ-BN20 items correlated more strongly with their own scale (r>0.70) than with other QLQ-BN20 scales. Internal consistency reliability coefficients were high (all alpha0.70). Known-groups comparisons yielded positive results, with the QLQ-BN20 distinguishing between patients with differing levels of performance status and mental functioning. Responsiveness of the questionnaire to changes over time was acceptable. Conclusion: The QLQ-BN20 demonstrates adequate psychometric properties and can be recommended for use in conjunction with the QLQ-C30 in assessing the HRQOL of brain cancer patients in international studies.

EFEITO DA COBERTURA VEGETAL DO SOLO SOBRE A ABUNDÂNCIA E DIVERSIDADE DE INIMIGOS NATURAIS DE PRAGAS EM VINHEDOS

O controle de pragas da videira no Brasil restringe-se basicamente ao uso de inseticidas, devido à inexistência de trabalhos que visem a complementar o manejo de pragas através de controle biológico. Neste trabalho, objetivou-se verificar o efeito de diferentes coberturas vegetais nas entrelinhas de plantio de videira sobre a abundância e diversidade de potenciais inimigos naturais de pragas da videira no município de Caldas, região Sul do Estado de Minas Gerais. Foram testadas sete diferentes coberturas de solo (aveia-preta, aveia-preta e ervilhaca, ervilhaca, cobertura morta, uso de herbicida, capina mecânica e mato roçado). A cobertura vegetal do solo influenciou tanto a diversidade quanto a abundância de inimigos naturais, sendo o consórcio de aveia-preta e ervilhaca, cultivadas simultaneamente, o tratamento que proporcionou maior diversidade e abundância de inimigos naturais. Assim, a cobertura vegetal do solo pode, potencialmente, ser um componente importante em programas de manejo integrado de pragas na cultura da videira.

Clear Cell Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma and Renal Angiomyoadenomatous Tumor: Two Variants of a Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Genetic Distinct Entity of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (ccpRCC) and renal angiomyoadenomatous tumor (RAT) share morphologic similarities with clear cell (ccRCC) and papillary RCC (pRCC). It is a matter of controversy whether their morphologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features allow the definition of a separate renal carcinoma entity. The aim of our project was to investigate specific renal immunohistochemical biomarkers involved in the hypoxia-inducible factor pathway and mutations in the VHL gene to clarify the relationship between ccpRCC and RAT. We investigated 28 ccpRCC and 9 RAT samples by immunohistochemistry using 25 markers. VHL gene mutations and allele losses were investigated by Sanger sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Clinical follow-up data were obtained for a subset of the patients. No tumor recurrence or tumor-related death was observed in any of the patients. Immunohistochemistry and molecular analyses led to the reclassification of 3 tumors as ccRCC and TFE3 translocation carcinomas. The immunohistochemical profile of ccpRCC and RAT samples was very similar but not identical, differing from both ccRCC and pRCC. Especially, the parafibromin and hKIM-1 expression exhibited differences in ccpRCC/RAT compared with ccRCC and pRCC. Genetic analysis revealed VHL mutations in 2/27 (7%) and 1/7 (14%) ccpRCC and RAT samples, respectively. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis disclosed a 3p loss in 2/20 (10%) ccpRCC samples. ccpRCC and RAT have a specific morphologic and immunohistochemical profile, but they share similarities with the more aggressive renal tumors. On the basis of our results, we regard ccpRCC/RAT as a distinct entity of RCCs.

Condromalácia de patela: comparação entre os achados em aparelhos de RM de alto e baixo campo magnético

OBJETIVO: Comparar os aparelhos de ressonância magnética de baixo campo e de alto campo para estudo da cartilagem articular da patela. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foi realizado estudo usando as seqüências GRE 2D, GRE 3D, FSE T2 e STIR (baixo campo) e TSE T2 SPIR. Cada seqüência foi analisada separadamente para o estudo da cartilagem, sem o conhecimento dos dados do paciente e do resultado das outras seqüências, sendo atribuído grau de lesão de 0 a 3 e descrita a sua localização. Os resultados de concordância e discordância foram analisados pelos testes de Kappa e McNemar. RESULTADOS: Na faceta medial houve baixas concordâncias e as discordâncias mostraram significativa superestimação. Na faceta lateral houve boas concordâncias e as discordâncias não foram significativas. No ápice houve boas concordâncias e as discordâncias mostraram significativa subestimação. CONCLUSÃO: A seqüência STIR teve a melhor concordância com a seqüência TSE T2 SPIR. Lesões de alto grau são mais bem caracterizadas pelas seqüências do aparelho de baixo campo. Áreas de aumento de sinal dificultam o estudo da cartilagem da faceta medial da patela no aparelho de baixo campo.

Les paradoxes de l'argumentation en contexte d'éducation : s'accorder sur les désaccords. Analyse d'interactions argumentatives dans un dispositif de formation en psychologie à l'Université

Dans le chapitre « Les paradoxes de l'argumentation en contexte d'éducation: s'accorder sur les désaccords », Muller Mirza part de l'idée qu'à la différence des situations ordinaires de désaccords, les dispositifs utilisant l'argumentation dans des contextes d'éducation demandent aux participants précisément de résoudre ces désaccords. Leur sont donc interdites, par contrat plus ou moins implicite, les échappatoires auxquelles nous recourons volontiers dans les discours quotidiens qui permettent d'éviter de problématiser la question en discussion. C'est dire qu'elle aborde directement une difficulté souvent signalée dans les études sur l'argumentation en contexte éducatif : la tension entre d'une part l'expression de points de vue différents, étape nécessaire à la construction des connaissances, et d'autre part la préservation de la relation entre les interlocuteurs, de leurs faces. Le chapitre propose comme objet de discussion le rôle de cette tension dans des situations d'apprentissage en analysant des productions argumentatives réalisées dans le cadre d'un dispositif particulier. Il invite ainsi à une réflexion non seulement sur les ingrédients des dispositifs pédagogiques qui permettraient de prendre en compte cette tension mais aussi sur les méthodes d'analyse des interactions argumentatives. L'étude de cas met en scène des étudiants de master en psychologie sociale, dans le cadre d'un jeu de rôle : ils sont placés dans la perspective de leur futur métier, et figurent des psychologues conseillant des éducateurs face à des jeunes qui utilisent des insultes racistes entre eux. Le dispositif mis en oeuvre satisfait quatre exigences d'ordre théorique, favorables selon l'auteure à une bonne résolution des désaccords : le ménagement des faces des interlocuteurs en fixant des rôles ne correspondant pas nécessairement aux positions de chacun ; la construction de connaissances,préalable à la discussion ; la médiation de l'échange par un outil, ici un « chat », qui permet d'échanger les points de vue et d'apporter une dimension réflexive en cours d'interaction sur les points de vue exprimés ; le fait de donner du sens à l'activité, en simulant une situation professionnelle potentielle. L'analyse des échanges a été réalisée sur onze corpus constitués par les étudiants en petits groupes de trois ou quatre travaillant sur un logiciel de « chat ». Les questions abordées étaient les suivantes : Comment les interlocuteurs négocient-ils les désaccords qui apparaissent au cours des échanges? Ces désaccords sont-ils propices à une problématisation? Les participants mettent-ils en oeuvre des dynamiques d'« exploration » du désaccord relevé? Cette analyse, inspirée d'une approche socioculturelle reprise en partie des travaux de Neil Mercer sur les « discours exploratoires », met en évidence des dynamiques argumentatives de qualité au cours desquels les désaccords sont non seulement exprimés mais également problématisés au sein des groupes. Elle met entre autres en évidence que le sens de l'activité pour les étudiants est en partie tributaire d'un contrat didactique et pédagogique : leurs échanges sont la base de leur évaluation universitaire. Néanmoins la similitude entre situation d'enseignement et situation professionnelle a largement été perçue par les étudiants et motivante pour eux, ce qui a certainement concouru également à la qualité des échanges.