Gendered Violence and International Human Rights: Thinking Non-Discrimination Beyond the Sex Binary

The concept of non-discrimination has been central in the feminist challenge to gendered violence within international human rights law. This article critically explores non-discrimination and the challenge it seeks to pose to gendered violence through the work of Judith Butler. Drawing upon Butler’s critique of heteronormative sex/gender, the article utilises an understanding of gendered violence as effected by the restrictive scripts of sex/gender within heteronormativity to illustrate how the development of non-discrimination within international human rights law renders it ineffective to challenge gendered violence due to its own commitments to binarised and asymmetrical sex/gender. However, the article also seeks to encourage a reworking of non-discrimination beyond the heteronormative sex binary through employing Butler’s concept of cultural translation. Analysis via the lens of cultural translation reveals the fluidity of non-discrimination as a universal concept and offers new possibilities for feminist engagement with universal human rights.

Thinking ‘Dignity’ as a basis towards inclusive development

In an era of increasing political disenfranchisement, deep economic inequalities and associated social humiliations encountered by the rapidly globalising planet, this paper seeks to chart the current thinking about the paths that civil society need to take in order to achieve distinctive peace. Here commitment as part of the universal cosmopolitan order is critical to go beyond the binaries of religious and cultural differences. The role of dignity, of interdependency, respect and understanding has become all the more critical to sustain hope and life in this age of austerity. The paper argues for an empowered citizenship, based on dignity and respect to think socially towards inclusive development.

Computational Thinking across a Life Course

Symposium of papers on Computational Thinking

Wishful Thinking: Lessons from the internal and external evaluations of an innovatory education project in Northern Ireland

From March 1999 to August 2000, the authors were involved in simultaneous internal and external evaluations of the social civic and political education (SCaPE) project in Northern Ireland. This project was a major initiative established by the Citizenship Foundation, the Northern Ireland Council for the Curriculum, Examination and Assessment (CCEA), and the School of Education at the University of Ulster at Coleraine. It was a 2-year project in 25 secondary schools established to design, develop, pilot and evaluate a new programme of social, civic and political education for Northern Ireland. It also aimed to serve as a model for future Citizenship curriculum developments throughout Northern Ireland and elsewhere. This paper describes the background to the project, the design and conduct of the two evaluations, and the links between them. It outlines the main conclusions of each evaluation and describes the way SCaPE has since evolved into a mainstream curriculum development project. The final part of the paper analyses the key opportunities, tensions and challenges involved in running such evaluations at a critical time in the history of Northern Ireland – a time when innovation is both necessary and controversial. It argues that, especially in such circumstances, evaluation cannot be conducted from a neutral, objective standpoint, and that it is incumbent on evaluators to recognise the emotional, personal and political commitment they make to the projects in which they are engaged.

O designer como intérprete de cenários de equipamentos

Esta dissertação pretende contribuir para a investigação em design, validando a interpretação como método em design aplicada a meta-projectos de cenários de equipamentos no século XXI. A análise e a avaliação dos dois conceitos - interpretação e cenário - como reflexo da maneira de pensar da contemporaneidade são a base para a estruturação de um meta-projecto aplicado na epiderme da cidade, sustentado pela metodologia projectual da hermenêutica e pela competência da semiótica. Este projecto de investigação organiza-se em duas partes; cada uma desenvolvida ao longo de três capítulos. No primeiro capítulo da primeira parte averigua-se o relacionamento entre a metodologia projectual aplicada por projectistas, desde o séc. XVII até aos nossos dias, e o pensamento filosófico para fundamentar a interpretação como método em design. No segundo capítulo analisa-se o cenário enquanto superfície vertical da cidade definida por um sistema de equipamentos. Por um lado, verifica-se que o equipamento ( équipement , Le Corbusier) é a proposta de ordem construtiva dos anos 20 e que a pattern ( pattern language , Alexander) é a ordem construtiva a partir dos anos 70. Por outro lado, averigua-se que hoje a superfície da cidade é constituída por várias camadas e que a camada superior é a epiderme. Enquanto película de sistema de patterns, a epiderme revela-se apta a deixar-se afectar pela mudança e, consequentemente, a ser trabalhada pelo design. O terceiro capítulo analisa a história da cultura da superfície dos edifícios no contexto ocidental, da Grécia Clássica aos nossos dias, para interpretar a proposta do design da epiderme. Para caracterizar a complexidade do período compreendido entre a acção metodológica de Le Corbusier nos anos 20 e o séc. XXI são comentados cinco momentos temáticos distintos. No primeiro capítulo da segunda parte escolhe-se o exercício do meta-projecto como instrumento de reflexão projectual dialéctico, definidor de uma metodologia projectual. O meta-projecto é analisado na realidade ocidental diacrónica e sincronicamente para fundamentar o conceito de junkspace como nova ordem. Neste sentido, são interpretados conceitos relativos à vivência urbana, reivindicando-lhes uma nova existência: a iluminação, a zona verde como pulmão da cidade, a energia interpretada como competência do cenário envolvente e o junkspace como nova ordem arquitectónica. No segundo capítulo define-se uma estratégia meta-projectual narrativa aplicada ao projecto da epiderme da cidade, destacando a particular importância do relacionamento entre a investigação em design e as empresas como fonte de inovação e de conhecimento. O terceiro capítulo defende um exercício experimental na área do projecto da epiderme dos edifícios como uma oportunidade para desenvolver diferentes propostas, partindo do mesmo brief. São apresentados resultados dos workshops inter-disciplinares entre o contexto académico e a realidade empresarial que alimentam o meta-projecto enquanto processo dialéctico, contínuo e inovador. Conclui-se com o argumento de que o design é uma disciplina com uma participação fundamental na valorização e na transformação das cidades do século XXI.

Rational Thinking and Belief in Psychic Abilities: It Depends on Level of Involvement

Previous research has shown that lay believers in psychic abilities are more prone to intuitive thinking, less inclined to rational thinking, and have an external locus of control, compared to non-believers. Psychic practitioners, however, may have different characteristics. Psychic practitioners (N=31; mean age = 42.7 years, s.d.=13.1), lay believers (N=33; mean age = 33.0 years, s.d.=10.3), and non-believers (N=31; mean age = 34.4 years, s.d.=15.4) completed questionnaires measuring thinking styles, locus of control, and psychic belief. Comparisons of lay believers with non-believers confirmed previous observations; believers had a higher propensity for intuitive thinking, lower propensity for rational thinking, and more external locus of control. In contrast, practitioners were equivalent to non-believers in rational thinking and had the highest internal locus of control. This highlights the importance of considering level of involvement with psychic practice in understanding the thinking styles of believers. Results suggested that practitioners may have rationalised their beliefs and constructed a coherent model of psychic phenomena that satisfies a propensity for rational thinking within a community of belief.

Flourishing as a dialectical balance: emerging insights from second-wave positive psychology

Positive psychology, an emergent branch of scholarship concerned with wellbeing and flourishing, initially defined itself by a focus on “positive” emotions and qualities. However, critics soon pointed out that this binary logic—classifying phenomena as either positive or negative, and valorising the former while disparaging the latter—could be problematic. For example, apparently positive qualities can be harmful to wellbeing in certain circumstances, while ostensibly dysphoric emotional states may on occasion promote flourishing. Responding to these criticisms, over recent years a more nuanced “second wave” of positive psychology has been developing, in which wellbeing is recognized as involving a dialectical balance of light and dark aspects of life. This article introduces this emergent second wave, arguing that it is characterized by four dialectical principles. First, the principle of appraisal states that it is difficult to categorically identify phenomena as either positive or negative, since such appraisals are fundamentally contextually dependent. Second, the principle of co-valence holds that many states and qualities at the heart of flourishing, such as love, are actually a complex blend of light and dark elements. Third, the principle of complementarity posits that not only are such phenomena co-valenced, but that their dichotomous elements are in fact co-creating, two intertwined sides of the same coin. Finally, the principle of evolution allows us to understand second-wave positive psychology as itself being an example of a dialectical process. This article is published as part of a collection entitled “On balance: lifestyle, mental health and wellbeing”.

The Impact of Critical Thinking Disposition on Learning Using Business Simulations

This research seeks to determine the relationship between students’ critical thinking disposition and their learning while engaging in a business simulation at a UK higher education institution (HEI). The research informs educators making decisions about the use of simulations as to the value of considering critical thinking dispositions. Previous research has found that simulations are an effective way for students to engage actively in learning, bridging the gap between theory and practice. It has also been found that such simulations can develop students’ critical thinking skills. However, hitherto no research has been undertaken into the role that existing critical thinking disposition has on the learning of students, as measured by the degree to which students perceived that they met the module’s intended learning outcomes. This research offers insights into the role and importance of critical thinking disposition and its component dimensions and how this impacts student learning. The results indicate that the level of critical thinking disposition is positively related to the students’ learning. The implications of the research suggest educators should target business simulations at specific cohorts of students. The relative importance of the critical thinking disposition constructs and the practical educational implications of these findings are discussed.

Abstract thinking: a predictor of modelling ability?

In this paper, we describe a study of the abstract thinking skills of a group of students studying object-oriented modelling as part of a Masters course. Abstract thinking has long been considered a core skill for computer scientists. This study is part of attempts to gather evidence about the link between abstract thinking skills and success in the Computer Science discipline. The results of this study show a positive correlation between the scores of the students in the abstract thinking test with the marks achieved in the module. However, the small numbers in the study mean that wider research is needed.