Changes in Petrophysical Properties of the Stone Surface due to Past Conservation Treatments in Archaeological Sites of Merida (Spain)

Petrophysical properties, such as porosity, permeability, density or anisotropy de-termine the alterability of stone surfaces from archaeological sites, and therefore, the future preservation of the material. Others, like superficial roughness or color, may point out changes due to alteration processes, natural or man-induced, for ex-ample, by conservation treatments. The application of conservation treatments may vary some of these properties forcing the stone surface to a re-adaptation to the new conditions, which could generate new processes of deterioration. In this study changes resulting from the application of consolidating and hydrophobic treatments on stone materials from the Roman Theatre (marble and granite) and the Mitreo’s House (mural painting and mosaics), both archaeological sites from Merida (Spain), are analyzed. The use of portable field devices allows us to perform analyses both on site and in la-boratory, comparing treated and untreated samples. Treatments consisted of syn-thetic resins, consolidating (such as tetraethoxysilane TEOS) and hydrophobic products. Results confirm that undesirable changes may occur, with consequences ranging from purely aesthetic variations to physical, chemical and mechanical damages. This also permits us to check limitations in the use of these techniques for the evaluation of conservation treatments.

NDT for the detection and characterization of superficial treatments on stone material from archaeological sites of Merida (Spain)

Different treatments (consolidation and water-repellent) were applied on samples of marble and granite from the Front stage of the Roman Theatre of Merida (Spain). The main goal is to study the effects of these treatments on archaeological stone material, by analyzing the surface changes. X-Ray Fluorescence and Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy techniques, as well as Nuclear Magnetic Resonance have been used in order to study changes in the surface properties of the material, comparing treated and untreated specimens. The results confirm that silicon (Si) marker tracking allows the detection of applied treatments, increasing the peak signal in treated specimens. Furthermore, it is also possible to prove changes both within the pore system of the materialand in the distribution of surface water, resulting from the application of these products

Teoría y práctica de la restauración de la Mezquita-Catedral de Córdoba durante el siglo XX

La Mezquita-Catedral de Córdoba es un edificio vivo. Un edificio que ha sido transformado sucesivamente por hombres de razas, culturas y religiones distintas durante sus más de 1.200 años de vida y que, a pesar de ello, no ha dejado de estar en uso ni uno solo de esos días de esa larga vida. De esta forma, el edificio se muestra ante el visitante como un complejo objeto arquitectónico, resultado de una continua transformación. La capacidad de la transformación de los edificios es algo inherente a su propia condición arquitectónica, no es un hecho exclusivo de la Mezquita-Catedral. Sin embargo, en este edificio esa transformación se produce con una gran intensidad y sin pérdida de su autenticidad. Tradicionalmente, los edificios se han adaptado a los nuevos requerimientos de cada época en un proceso que ha buscado en el propio edificio las leyes o principios que habían de regir la intervención. De esta forma, tanto las sucesivas ampliaciones de la Mezquita de Abd al-Rahman I como las siguientes intervenciones cristianas debieron asumir lo preexistente como material de trabajo. Así, los arquitectos del califa al-Hakam II dialogaron con sus antecesores complejizando el espacio que recibieron, así como los Hernán Ruiz consiguieron un nuevo organismo resultante de la introducción de su arquitectura luminosa en la trama hispanomusulmana. El siglo XIX confirmó el deseo por descubrir las huellas de un pasado esplendoroso que la intervención barroca había silenciado bajo un tratamiento homogéneo del espacio. La recuperación de esas huellas supuso, hace exactamente dos siglos, el inicio de la última gran etapa en la transformación del edificio, la de la restauración. La fábrica es considerada como objeto a conservar y los esfuerzos desde ese momento se centraron en la recuperación de la arquitectura omeya latente. De este modo, la práctica de la restauración como disciplina se encontró absolutamente influenciada por la Arqueología como única fuente de conocimiento. Las intervenciones buscaban lo original como modo de recuperar espacial y formalmente aquel pasado, concentrándose en los lugares del edificio considerados como esenciales. La declaración del edificio como monumento nacional en 1882 propició que el Estado se hiciera cargo de su mantenimiento y conservación, sustituyendo en esa tarea a los Obispos y Cabildos del siglo XIX, que tuvieron un entendimiento muy avanzado para su época. La llegada del arquitecto Velázquez Bosco en las últimas décadas del siglo XIX supuso un cambio trascendental en la historia del edificio, puesto que recibió un edificio con importantes deterioros y consiguió poner las bases del edificio que hoy contemplamos. El empeño por la recuperación material y espacial devolvió a la Mezquita-Catedral buena parte de su imagen original, reproduciendo con exactitud los modelos hallados en las exploraciones arqueológicas. La llegada de Antonio Flórez tras la muerte de Velázquez Bosco supuso la traslación al edificio del debate disciplinar que se desarrolló en las dos primeras décadas del siglo XX. Flórez procuró un nuevo entendimiento de la intervención, considerando la conservación como actuación prioritaria. En 1926 el Estado reformó la manera en que se atendía al patrimonio con la creación de un sistema de zonas y unos arquitectos a cargo de ellas. La existencia de un nuevo marco legislativo apuntaló esa nueva visión conservativa, avalada por la Carta de Atenas de 1931. Este modelo restauración científica huía de la intervención en estilo y valoraba la necesidad de intervenir de la manera más escueta posible y con un lenguaje diferenciado, basándose en los datos que ofrecía la Arqueología. Por tanto, se continuaba con la valoración del edificio como documento histórico, buscando en este caso una imagen diferenciada de la intervención frente a la actitud mimética de Velázquez. Resulta destacable la manera en la que el historiador Manuel Gómez-Moreno influyó en varias generaciones de arquitectos, arqueólogos e historiadores, tanto en el entendimiento científico de la restauración como en la propia estructura administrativa. La labor desarrollada en el edificio por José Mª Rodríguez Cano primero y Félix Hernández a continuación estuvo influida de manera teórica por el método de Gómez-Moreno, aunque en muchos aspectos su labor no representó una gran diferencia con lo hecho por Velázquez Bosco. La búsqueda de lo original volvió a ser recurrente, pero la carga económica del mantenimiento de un edificio tan extenso conllevó la no realización de muchos de los proyectos más ambiciosos. Esta obsesiva búsqueda de la imagen original del edificio tuvo su última y anacrónica etapa con la intervención de la Dirección General de Arquitectura en los 70. Sin embargo, el agotamiento del modelo científico ya había propiciado un nuevo escenario a nivel europeo, que cristalizó en la Carta de Venecia de 1964 y en una nueva definición del objeto a preservar, más allá del valor como documento histórico. Esta nueva posición teórica tuvo su traslación al modelo restaurador español en el último cuarto de siglo XX, coincidiendo con la Transición. El arquitecto Dionisio Hernández Gil defendió una interpretación distinta a la de los arqueólogos y de los historiadores, que había prevalecido durante todo el siglo. En opinión de Hernández Gil, los problemas de intervención debían enfocarse fundamentalmente como problemas de Arquitectura, abandonando la idea de que solamente podían ser resueltos por especialistas. Esta convicción teórica fue defendida desde la nueva Administración y deparó la utilización de unos criterios de intervención particularizados, provenientes del análisis multifocal de cada situación y no sólo desde el valor de los edificios como documentos históricos. Y este cambio tuvo su traslación a la Mezquita-Catedral con la práctica de Gabriel Ruiz Cabrero y Gabriel Rebollo. En consecuencia con esa nueva perspectiva, aceptaron el edificio que recibieron, sustituyendo la búsqueda de aquella página original por la aceptación de cada una de las páginas de su historia y el respeto a las técnicas constructivas del pasado. La búsqueda de soluciones específicas desde el propio objeto arquitectónico significó la renovada atención a la potente estructura formal-constructiva como origen de toda reflexión. Considerar la Mezquita-Catedral en primer lugar como Arquitectura implicaba la atención a todo tipo de factores además de los históricos, como medio para preservar su autenticidad. Esta tesis pretende demostrar que la práctica de la restauración realizada en la Mezquita-Catedral a lo largo del siglo XX ha evolucionado desde la búsqueda de lo original hasta la búsqueda de lo auténtico, como reflejo de una visión basada en lo arqueológico frente a una renovada visión arquitectónica más completa, que incluye a la anterior. La consideración de la intervención en este edificio como otra página más de su historia y no como la última, significa la reedición de un mecanismo recurrente en la vida del edificio y un nuevo impulso en ese proceso de continua transformación. ABSTRACT The Mosque-Cathedral of Cordoba is a living building. A building transformed by men of different races, cultures and religions during more than 1.200 years old and that, nevertheless, it has continued to be in use all days in that long life. Thus, the building shows to the visitor as a complex architectural object, the result of continuous transformation. This transformation capacity of the buildings is inherent in their own architectural condition, it’s not an exclusive fact of the Mosque-Cathedral. However, in this building that transformation happens with a great intensity, without losing their authenticity. Traditionally, buildings have been adapted to the new requirements of times in a process that looked for laws or principles in order to guide the intervention. Thus, both the successive enlargements of the Mosque of Abd al-Rahman and Christian interventions must assume the preexistence as a working material. So, the architects of the caliph al-Hakam II spoke to their predecessors, complexing the receiving space, as well as Hernan Ruiz got a new organism as result the introduction of his luminous architecture into hispanic-muslim weft. The nineteenth century confirmed the desire to discover the traces of a glorious past that Baroque intervention had silenced, under a uniform space treatment. Exactly two centuries ago, the recovery of these traces meant the start of the last major phase in the transformation of the building: the restoration. The building was considered subject to conserve and since then, efforts focused on the recovery of latent Umayyad architecture. Thus, the practice of restoration as a discipline was absolutely influenced by Archaeology as the only source of knowledge. Interventions were seeking the original as the way to recover that past in a space and formal way, concentrating on essential sites of the building. The statement as a national monument in 1882 prompted the State take charge of its maintenance and preservation, replacing to the nineteenth century Bishops and Cabildos, which had a very advanced understanding for that time. The arrival of the architect Velazquez Bosco in the last decades of the nineteenth century involved a momentous change in the history of the building, since he received a building with significant damage and he achieved the foundations of the building that we can see today. Efforts to a material and space recover returned the Mosque-Cathedral to its original image, accurately reproducing the models found in archaeological explorations. The arrival of Antonio Florez after Velazquez’s death involved the translation of discipline debate, which was developed in the first two decades of the twentieth century. Florez tried a new understanding of the intervention, considering conservation as a priority action. In 1926, the State reformed the way in which heritage was attended, creating a zones system with a few architects in charge of them. The existence of a new legislative framework, underpinned this new conservative vision, supported by the Athens Charter of 1931. This scientific restoration model fleeing from intervention in style and it appreciated the need to intervene in the most concise way, with a distinct language based on the data offered by Archaeology. Therefore, it continued with the appraisement of the building as a historical document, seeking in this case a differentiated image of intervention, against Velazquez mimetic attitude. It is remarkable the way in which the historian Manuel Gomez-Moreno influenced several generations of architects, archaeologists and historians, both in the scientific understanding of the restoration and the administrative structure. The work of Jose Maria Rodriguez Cano first and then Felix Hernandez was theoretically influenced by the Gomez-Moreno’s method, although in many respects their work did not represent a great difference to Velazquez Bosco. The search of the original returned to recur, but the economic charge of maintaining such a large building led to the non-realization of many of the most ambitious projects. This obsessive search for the original image of the building had its last and anachronistic stage with the intervention of the Department of Architecture at 70’s. However, the exhaustion of the scientific model had already led to a new scenario at European level, which crystallized in the Venice Charter of 1964 and a new definition of the object to be preserved beyond the value as a historical document. This new theoretical position had its translation to Spanish restaurateur model in the last quarter of the twentieth century, coinciding with the Transition. The architect Dionisio Hernandez Gil defended a different interpretation from archaeologists and historians, that had prevailed throughout the century. According to Hernandez Gil, the problems of intervention should focus primarily as architectural issues, abandoning the idea that they could only be determined by specialist. This theoretical conviction was defended from the new administration and led to the use of particularized criteria, from a multifocal analysis of each situation. And this change had its translation to the Mosque with the practice of Gabriel Ruiz Cabrero and Gabriel Rebollo. Consistent with this new perspective, they accepted the receiving building, replacing the search on original page for acceptance of all historical pages and respecting the constructive techniques of the past. The search for specific solutions from the architectural object meant the renewed attention to the powerful formal-constructive structure as the origin of all thought. Consider the Mosque-Cathedral as Architecture, involved the attention to all kinds of factors in addition to the historical, as a means to preserve its authenticity. This thesis aims to demonstrate that the practice of restoration in the Mosque-Cathedral throughout the twentieth century has evolved from the search of the original to the search for the authentic, reflecting a vision based on the archaeological against a renewed more complete architectural vision, including the above. Consideration of intervention in this building as another page in its history and not the last one, means the reissue of an own mechanism and a new impetus in that continuous transformation process.

Oxygen Isotope Analysis of Human Bone Phosphate Evidences Weaning Age in Archaeological Populations

Peer reviewed

The earliest archaeological maize (Zea mays L.) from highland Mexico: New accelerator mass spectrometry dates and their implications

Accelerator mass spectrometry age determinations of maize cobs (Zea mays L.) from Guilá Naquitz Cave in Oaxaca, Mexico, produced dates of 5,400 carbon-14 years before the present (about 6,250 calendar years ago), making those cobs the oldest in the Americas. Macrofossils and phytoliths characteristic of wild and domesticated Zea fruits are absent from older strata from the site, although Zea pollen has previously been identified from those levels. These results, together with the modern geographical distribution of wild Zea mays, suggest that the cultural practices that led to Zea domestication probably occurred elsewhere in Mexico. Guilá Naquitz Cave has now yielded the earliest macrofossil evidence for the domestication of two major American crop plants, squash (Cucurbita pepo) and maize.

Archaeological evidence of teosinte domestication from Guilá Naquitz, Oaxaca

Analysis of the three most ancient Zea mays inflorescence fragments from Guilá Naquitz, Oaxaca, Mexico shows they did not disarticulate naturally, indicating that agricultural selection of domesticated teosinte was underway by 5,400 14C years before the present (about 4,200 dendrocalibrated years B.C.). The cooccurrence of two-ranked specimens with two rows and four rows of grain and numerous additional morphological characteristics of these specimens support hypotheses based on molecular and quantitative genetic analyses that maize evolved from teosinte. Domestication of the wild ancestor of maize occurred before the end of the 5th millennium B.C.

Early al-Andalus: an Archaeological Approach to the Process of Islamization in the Iberian Peninsula (7th to 10th centuries)

This paper is part of the research project HAR2012–34035 (Lectura arqueológica del uso social del espacio. Espacios domésticos y vida social entre la Antigüedad y el Medievo, funded by the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness).

Archaeological research at Tumatumani, Juli, Peru / Charles Stanish, Lee Steadman ; with a contribution by Matthew T. Seddon.

n.s. no.23(1994)

An early archaeological example of tattooing from northwestern Alaska / James W. VanStone, Curator, North American Archaeology and Ethnology, Field Museum of Natural History, and Charles V. Lucier, Alaska Dept. of Fish and Game.

v.66:no.1(1974)

Charter of 1650, 1650 May 31

Original charter dated May 31, 1650. The charter is engrossed on sheepskin and signed by Thomas Dudley.

Some Acct. of Sev'l things relating to the College contain'd in ye Charter Laws &c with references to the originals (manuscript partial copy), [1721 October]

Two octavo-sized leaves with four half-page columns containing a handwritten copy, made by President Leverett, of an October 17, 1721 a paper composed by Nicholas Sever and William Welsteed to Judge Samuel Sewall.

Draft of President Leverett's Harvard College charter, [ca. 1723]

Two folio-sized leaves and two octavo-sized leaves containing a handwritten draft of a Harvard Charter in President Leverett's hand. Following a salutation to King George, the text begins, "Whereas there hath been for more than seventy years past in the Town of Cambridge..."

Copy of the Harvard College Charter of 1650 annotated by John Leverett, undated

One leaf containing a two-page handwritten copy of the Harvard College Charter of 1650 with thirteen numbered annotations in President Leverett's hand. The annotations summarize the duties and powers assigned to the President in the Charter.

Harvard College Charter of 1650 (eighteenth-century manuscript copy), undated

Two folio-sized leaves containing a four-page copy of the Harvard College Charter of 1650.