Protection of pancreatic beta-cells by high density lipoproteins

SUMMARYThe incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing worldwide and is linked to the enhancement of obesity. The principal cause of T2D development is insulin resistance, which lead to the increase of insulin production by the pancreatic beta-cells. In a pathological environment, namely dyslipidaemia, hyperglycaemia and inflammation, beta-cell compensation will fail in more vulnerable cells and diabetes will occur. High Density Lipoproteins (HDLs), commonly named "good cholesterol" are known to be atheroprotective. Low levels of HDLs are associated with increased prevalence of cardiovascular disease but are also an independent risk factor for the development of T2D. HDLs were demonstrated to protect pancreatic beta-cells against several stresses. However the molecular mechanisms of the protection are unknown and the objectives of this work were to try to elucidate the way how HDLs protect. The first approach was a broad screening of genes regulated by the stress and HDLs. A microarray analysis was performed on beta-cells stressed by serum deprivation and rescued by HDLs. Among the genes regulated, we focused on 4E-BP1, a cap-dependent translational inhibitor. In addition, HDLs were also found to protect against several other stresses.Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is a mechanism that may play a role in the onset of T2D. The unfolded protein response (UPR) is a physiological process that aims at maintaining ER homeostasis in conditions where the protein folding and secretion is perturbed. Specific signalling pathways are involved in the increase of folding, export and degradation capacity of the ER. However, in case where the stress is prolonged, this mechanism turns to be pathological, by inducing cell death effector pathways, leading to beta-cell apoptosis. In our study, we discovered that HDLs were protective against ER stress induced by drugs and physiological stresses such as saturated free fatty acids. HDLs protected beta-cells by promoting ER homeostasis via the improvement of the folding and trafficking od proteins from the ER to the Golgi apparatus.Altogether our results suggest that HDLs are important for beta-cell function and survival, by protecting them from several stresses and acting on ER homeostasis. This suggests that attempt in keeping normal HDLs levels or function in patients is crucial to lessen the development of T2D.RÉSUMÉL'incidence du diabète de type 2 est en constante augmentation et est fortement liée à l'accroissement du taux d'obésité. La cause principale du diabète de type 2 est la résistance à l'insuline, qui entraîne une surproduction d'insuline par les cellules bêta pancréatiques. Dans un environnement pathologique associé à l'obésité (dyslipidémie, hyperglycémie et inflammation), les cellules bêta les plus vulnérables ne sont plus capables de compenser en augmentant leur production d'insuline, dysfonctionnent, ce qui conduit à leur mort par apoptose. Les lipoprotéines de hautes densités (HDLs), communément appelées (( bon cholestérol », sont connues pour leurs propriétés protectrices contre l'athérosclérose. Des niveaux bas de HDLs sanguins sont associés au risque de développer un diabète de type 2. Les HDLs ont également montré des propriétés protectrices contre divers stresses dans la cellule bêta. Cependant, les mécanismes de protection restent encore inconnus et l'objectif de ce travail a été d'investiguer les mécanismes moléculaires de protection des HDLs. La première approche choisie a été une étude du profil d'expression génique par puce à ADN afin d'identifier les gènes régulés par le stress et les HDLs. Parmi les gènes régulés, notre intérêt s'est porté sur 4E-BP1, un inhibiteur de la traduction coiffe- dépendante, dont l'induction par le stress était corrélée avec une augmentation de l'apoptose. Suite à cette étude, les HDLs ont également montrés un rôle protecteur contre d'autres stresses. Il s'agit particulièrement du stress du réticulum endoplasmique (RE), qui est un mécanisme qui semble jouer un rôle clé dans le développement du diabète. L'UPR (« Unfolded Protein Response ») est un processus physiologique tendant à maintenir l'homéostasie du réticulum endoplasmique, organelle prépondérante pour la fonction des cellules sécrétrices, notamment lorsqu'elle est soumise à des conditions extrêmes telles que des perturbations de la conformation tertiaire des protéines ou de la sécrétion. Dans ces cas, des voies de signalisation moléculaires sont activées, ce qui mène à l'exportation des protéines mal repliées, à leur dégradation et à l'augmentation de l'expression de chaperonnes capables d'améliorer le repliement des protéines mal formées. Toutefois, en cas de stress persistant, ce mécanisme de protection s'avère être pathologique. En induisant des voies de signalisation effectrices de l'apoptose, il conduit finalement au développement du diabète. Dans cette étude, nous avons démontré que les HDLs étaient capables de protéger la cellule bêta contre le stress du RE induits par des inhibiteurs (thapsigargine, tunicamycine) ou des stresses physiologiques tels que les acides gras libres. Les HDLs ont la capacité d'améliorer l'homéostasie du RE, notamment en favorisant le repliement et le transfert des protéines du RE à l'appareil de Golgi.En résumé, ces données suggèrent que les HDLs sont bénéfiques pour la survie des cellules bêta soumises à des stresses impliqués dans le développement du diabète, notamment en restaurant l'homéostasie du RE. Ces résultats conduisent à soutenir que le maintien des taux de cholestérol joue un rôle important dans la limitation de l'incidence du diabète.

Mécanisme moléculaire de protection des HDLs contre le stress du réticulum endoplasmique dans la cellule beta pancréatique. [Molecular mechanisms of HDLs to protect against the endoplasmic reticulum stress in pancreatic beta cell.]

Introduction: Les particules de HDL (High Density Lipoproteins) ont des fonctions très diverses notamment anti-inflamatoires, anti-apoptotiques ou anti-oxydatives. Chez les patients diabétiques, les niveaux de HDLs sont bas, les prédisposants ainsi à un risque élévé à développer une maladie cardiovasculaire. Sachant que le s HDLs ont également un effet protecteur sur la cellule beta, le but de cette étude est dinvestigué les mécanismes moléculaires de cette protection contre le stress du réticulum, stress qui contriubue au développement du diabéte de type 2. Résultats: La thapsigargine et la tunicamycine induisent lapoptose en induisant un stress dans le réticulum endoplasmique (RE) par un mauvais repliement des protéines dans le RE, ainsi que l'activation de l'UPR (Unfolded Protein Respons) avec trois voies communes de signalisation intracellulaire (IRE1, PREK et ATF6). Ces voix veillent tout d'abord à augmenter la capacité de repliement des protéines et le cas échéant à lapoptose. Nos résultats montrent que les HDLs sont capable d'inhuber lapoptose induite par la thapsigargine et la tunicamycine dans les MIN6. Dans le cas du traitement avec la thapsigargine, plusieurs marqueurs des voix UPR sont bloqués en présence des HDLs, suggérant que l'effet anti-apoptotiques des HDLs s'exerce au niveau ou en amont du RE. Les HDLS par contre ne bloquent par la sortie de calcium du RE induite par la thapsigargine ce qui indique que les HDLs n'interfèrent pas avec l'action de cette drogue sur sa cible (SERCA). Dans le cas de la la tunicamycine, les HDLs ne bloquent pas, ou très légèrement, l'activation des voix de l'UPR. La protection induite par les HDLs contre la mort engendrée par la tunicamycine s'sexerce dont apparement en aval de l'UPR et reste à être déterminer. Conclusions: Nos données suggérent que les HDLs sont capable de protéger la cellule beta contre le stress du réticulum mais apparement de façon différente selon les modalités d'inductions de ce stress.

Potential target antigens for immunotherapy in human pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: To be effective and selective, immunotherapy ideally targets specifically tumor cells and spares normal tissues. Identification of tumor specific antigens is a prerequisite to establish an effective immunotherapy. Still very little is known about the expression of tumor-related antigens in pancreatic neoplasms. Cancer Testis antigens (CT) are antigens shared by a variety of malignant tumors, but not by normal tissues with the exception of germ cells in testis. Restricted expression in neoplastic tissues and inherent immunogenic features make CT antigens ideal for use in immunotherapy. We analyzed the expression of a selected panel of nine CT antigens that have been proven to elicit an efficient immunogenic response in other malignancies. In addition we analyzed the expression of HERV-K-MEL, an immunogenic antigen of viral origin. METHODS: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma tumor samples (n=130) were obtained intraoperatively, control tissues (n=23) were collected from cadaveric donor and from patients with chronic pancreatitis. Tumor-associated antigen expression of MAGE-A1, MAGE-A3, MAGE-A4, MAGE-A10, LAGE-1, NY-ESO-1, SCP-1, SSX-2, SSX-4 and HERV-K-MEL was assessed by PCR. Sequencing of PCR products were performed to assess the expression of SSX-4 in neoplastic and normal pancreatic tissues. RESULTS: Three of 10 tested antigens were expressed in over 10% of malignant pancreatic tissue samples. SSX-4 was found positive in 30% of cases, SCP-1 in 19% and HERV-K-MEL in 23% of cases. No expression of CT antigens was found in non-malignant pancreatic tissue with the exception of SSX-4 and and SSX-2. CONCLUSIONS: Fifty two percentage of the analyzed tissues expressed at least one CT antigen. The concomitant expression of SSX-4 in both malignant and non-malignant pancreatic tissue is a new finding which may raise concerns for immunotherapy. However, HERV-K-MEL is expressed with a relatively high prevalence and may be a candidate for specific immunotherapy in a large subgroup of pancreatic cancer patients. This study advocates the analysis of patients with regard to their immunogenic profile before the onset of antigen-specific immunotherapy.

Alterations in microRNA expression contribute to fatty acid-induced pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: Visceral obesity and elevated plasma free fatty acids are predisposing factors for type 2 diabetes. Chronic exposure to these lipids is detrimental for pancreatic beta-cells, resulting in reduced insulin content, defective insulin secretion, and apoptosis. We investigated the involvement in this phenomenon of microRNAs (miRNAs), a class of noncoding RNAs regulating gene expression by sequence-specific inhibition of mRNA translation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed miRNA expression in insulin-secreting cell lines or pancreatic islets exposed to palmitate for 3 days and in islets from diabetic db/db mice. We studied the signaling pathways triggering the changes in miRNA expression and determined the impact of the miRNAs affected by palmitate on insulin secretion and apoptosis. RESULTS: Prolonged exposure of the beta-cell line MIN6B1 and pancreatic islets to palmitate causes a time- and dose-dependent increase of miR34a and miR146. Elevated levels of these miRNAs are also observed in islets of diabetic db/db mice. miR34a rise is linked to activation of p53 and results in sensitization to apoptosis and impaired nutrient-induced secretion. The latter effect is associated with inhibition of the expression of vesicle-associated membrane protein 2, a key player in beta-cell exocytosis. Higher miR146 levels do not affect the capacity to release insulin but contribute to increased apoptosis. Treatment with oligonucleotides that block miR34a or miR146 activity partially protects palmitate-treated cells from apoptosis but is insufficient to restore normal secretion. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that at least part of the detrimental effects of palmitate on beta-cells is caused by alterations in the level of specific miRNAs.

Beta cell mass and growth after syngeneic islet cell transplantation in normal and streptozocin diabetic C57BL/6 mice

In islet transplantation, nonimmunological factors such as limited growth capacity or increased death rate could reduce the beta cell mass in the graft and lead to failure of the transplant. We studied the evolution of beta cell replication and mass after transplantation of insufficient, minimally sufficient, or excessive islet tissue. Streptozocin diabetic C57BL/6 mice received 150 or 300 syngeneic islets under the kidney capsule and normal mice received 300 islets. In streptozocin diabetic mice 300 islets restored normoglycemia; beta cell replication in transplanted islets was similar to replication in normal pancreas and beta cell mass in the graft remained constant. In contrast, 150 islets were insufficient to achieve normoglycemia; beta cell replication was increased initially but not by 18 or 30 d despite persistent hyperglycemia, and beta cell mass fell progressively. When islets were transplanted into normal recipients, beta cell replication remained normal but beta cells underwent atrophy and mass in the graft was substantially reduced. Therefore, with a successful islet transplant, in diabetic mice beta cell replication and mass remain constant. In contrast, when insufficient islet tissue is transplanted an initial increase in beta cell replication can not compensate for a decline in beta cell mass. When excessive islet tissue is transplanted, beta cell mass is reduced despite normal beta cell replication.

Transplanted beta cell response to increased metabolic demand. Changes in beta cell replication and mass

We determined the capacity of transplanted beta cells to modify their replication and mass when stimulated by changes in metabolic demand. Five groups of Lewis rats were studied: group 1 (Tx-Px) had a 95% pancreatectomy 14 d after transplantation of 500 islets; group 2 (Px-Tx) had a 95% pancreatectomy 14 d before transplantation of 500 islets; group 3 (Tx) was transplanted with 500 islets; group 4 (Px) had a 95% pancreatectomy; and group 5 (normal) was neither transplanted nor pancreatectomized. Blood glucose was normal in Tx-Px and Tx groups at all times. Px-Tx and Px groups developed severe hyperglycemia after pancreatectomy that was corrected in Px-Tx group in 83% of rats 28 d after transplantation. Replication of transplanted beta cells increased in Tx-Px (1.15 +/- 0.12%) and Px-Tx (0.85 +/- 0.12%) groups, but not in Tx group (0.64 +/- 0.07%) compared with normal pancreatic beta cells (0.38 +/- 0.05%) (P < 0.001). Mean beta cell size increased in Tx-Px (311 +/- 14 microns2) and Px-Tx (328 +/- 13 microns2) groups compared with Tx (252 +/- 12 microns2) and normal (239 +/- 9 microns2) groups (P < 0.001). Transplanted beta cell mass increased in Tx-Px (1.87 +/- 0.51 mg) and Px-Tx (1.55 +/- 0.21 mg) groups compared with Tx group (0.78 +/- 0.17 mg) (P < 0.05). In summary, changes in transplanted beta cells prevented the development of hyperglycemia in Tx-Px rats. Transplanted beta cells responded to increased metabolic demand increasing their beta cell mass.

Spatial, temporal and subcellular localization of islet-brain 1 (IB1), a homologue of JIP-1, in mouse brain.

Islet-brain 1 (IB1) was recently identified as a DNA-binding protein of the GLUT2 gene promoter. The mouse IB1 is the rat and human homologue of the Jun-interacting protein 1 (JIP-1) which has been recognized as a key player in the regulation of c-Jun amino-terminal kinase (JNK) mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways. JIP-1 is involved in the control of apoptosis and may play a role in brain development and aging. Here, IB1 was studied in adult and developing mouse brain tissue by in situ hybridization, Northern and Western blot analysis at cellular and subcellular levels, as well as by immunocytochemistry in brain sections and cell cultures. IB1 expression was localized in the synaptic regions of the olfactory bulb, retina, cerebral and cerebellar cortex and hippocampus in the adult mouse brain. IB1 was also detected in a restricted number of axons, as in the mossy fibres from dentate gyrus in the hippocampus, and was found in soma, dendrites and axons of cerebellar Purkinje cells. After birth, IB1 expression peaks at postnatal day 15. IB1 was located in axonal and dendritic growth cones in primary telencephalon cells. By biochemical and subcellular fractionation of neuronal cells, IB1 was detected both in the cytosolic and membrane fractions. Taken together with previous data, the restricted neuronal expression of IB1 in developing and adult brain and its prominent localization in synapses suggest that the protein may be critical for cell signalling in developing and mature nerve terminals.

Pancreatic stone protein as a postmortem biochemical marker for the diagnosis of sepsis.

Pancreatic stone protein/regenerating protein has recently emerged as an interesting diagnostic and prognostic marker of inflammation and sepsis in the clinical field. Increased blood concentrations have been described in patients with sepsis. Moreover, a high accuracy in predicting fatal outcomes in septic patients admitted to intensive care units has been reported. In this study, we investigated pancreatic stone protein/regenerating protein in postmortem serum in a series of sepsis-related fatalities, local infections and non-infectious cases that underwent medico-legal investigations. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 and pancreatic stone protein/regenerating protein were measured in the postmortem serum collected during autopsy in a group of sepsis-related deaths, local infections and non-septic intensive care unit patients. Statistically significant differences in pancreatic stone protein/regenerating protein concentrations were observed between sepsis and control patients. A significant positive correlation was found between procalcitonin and pancreatic stone protein/regenerating protein values in septic cases. Pancreatic stone protein/regenerating protein is measurable in postmortem serum from femoral blood collected during autopsy. Additionally, as in the clinical field, pancreatic stone protein/regenerating protein can be used as a postmortem biochemical marker for the diagnosis of sepsis.

HDLs protect pancreatic β-cells against ER stress by restoring protein folding and trafficking.

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) homeostasis alteration contributes to pancreatic β-cell dysfunction and death and favors the development of diabetes. In this study, we demonstrate that HDLs protect β-cells against ER stress induced by thapsigargin, cyclopiazonic acid, palmitate, insulin overexpression, and high glucose concentrations. ER stress marker induction and ER morphology disruption mediated by these stimuli were inhibited by HDLs. Using a temperature-sensitive viral glycoprotein folding mutant, we show that HDLs correct impaired protein trafficking and folding induced by thapsigargin and palmitate. The ability of HDLs to protect β-cells against ER stress was inhibited by brefeldin A, an ER to Golgi trafficking blocker. These results indicate that HDLs restore ER homeostasis in response to ER stress, which is required for their ability to promote β-cell survival. This study identifies a cellular mechanism mediating the beneficial effect of HDLs on β-cells against ER stress-inducing factors.

Involvement of 4E-BP1 in the protection induced by HDLs on pancreatic beta cells.

High-density lipoproteins (HDLs) protect pancreatic beta cells against apoptosis. This property might relate to the increased risk to develop diabetes in patients with low HDL blood levels. The mechanisms by which HDLs protect beta cells are poorly characterized however. Here we used a transcriptomic approach to identify genes differentially modulated by HDLs in beta cells subjected to apoptotic stimuli. The transcript encoding 4E-BP1 was up-regulated by serum starvation and HDLs blocked this increase. 4E-BP1 inhibits cap-dependent translation in its non- or hypo-phosphorylated state but it looses this ability when hyper-phosphorylated. At the protein level, 4E-BP1 was also up-regulated in response to starvation and IL1beta and this was blunted by HDLs. While an ectopic increase of 4E-BP1 expression induced beta cell death, silencing 4E-BP1 increase with shRNAs inhibited the apoptotic-inducing capacities of starvation. HDLs can therefore protect beta cells by blocking 4E-BP1 protein expression but this is not the sole protective mechanism activated by HDLs. Indeed, HDLs blocked apoptosis induced by ER stress with no associated decrease in total 4E-BP1 induction. Although, HDLs favored the phosphorylation, and hence the inactivation of 4E-BP1 in these conditions, this appeared not to be required for HDL protection. Our results indicate that HDLs can protect beta cells through modulation of 4E-BP1 depending on the type of stress stimuli.

Clinical benefit and quality of life in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine plus capecitabine versus gemcitabine alone: a randomized multicenter phase III clinical trial--SAKK 44/00-CECOG/PAN.1.3.001.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical benefit response (CBR) and quality of life (QOL) in patients receiving gemcitabine (Gem) plus capecitabine (Cap) versus single-agent Gem for advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive GemCap (oral Cap 650 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1 through 14 plus Gem 1,000 mg/m(2) in a 30-minute infusion on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks) or Gem (1,000 mg/m(2) in a 30-minute infusion weekly for 7 weeks, followed by a 1-week break, and then weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks) for 24 weeks or until progression. CBR criteria and QOL indicators were assessed over this period. CBR was defined as improvement from baseline for >or= 4 consecutive weeks in pain (pain intensity or analgesic consumption) and Karnofsky performance status, stability in one but improvement in the other, or stability in pain and performance status but improvement in weight. RESULTS: Of 319 patients, 19% treated with GemCap and 20% treated with Gem experienced a CBR, with a median duration of 9.5 and 6.5 weeks, respectively (P < .02); 54% of patients treated with GemCap and 60% treated with Gem had no CBR (remaining patients were not assessable). There was no treatment difference in QOL (n = 311). QOL indicators were improving under chemotherapy (P < .05). These changes differed by the time to failure, with a worsening 1 to 2 months before treatment failure (all P < .05). CONCLUSION: There is no indication of a difference in CBR or QOL between GemCap and Gem. Regardless of their initial condition, some patients experience an improvement in QOL on chemotherapy, followed by a worsening before treatment failure.