Clarifying approaches to: health needs assessment, health impact assessment, integrated impact assessment, health equity audit, and race equality impact assessment

Planners, policy makers and practitioners across all sectors in England use a range of approaches to assess health needs, inform decisions and assess impact. Use of these approaches can lead to improved health outcomes and reduced inequalities through auditing provision, access and outcomes. Five main approaches are used by local, regional and national government, voluntary agencies and the NHS: ۢ Health needs assessment (HNA) ۢ Health impact assessment (HIA) ۢ Integrated impact assessment (IIA) ۢ Health equity audit (HEA) ۢ Race equality impact assessment (REIA)

Health equity audit - learning from practice briefing

This briefing provides a summary of learning from three workshops on HEA, and examples of completed or near-completed HEAs to illustrate these learning points. It is recognised that this experience is evolving.

Health Equity Audit Made Simple: A briefing for Primary Care Trusts and Local Strategic Partnerships

A working/ consultation document outlining the key drivers and steps for undertaking health equity audit as required in the Performance and Planning Framework (PPF) 2003-2006

Commissioning for equity. A briefing on inequalities in access to revascularisation in the NHS and in the independent sector among London residents

This briefing describes inequalities in access to revascularisation using data from both the NHS and the independent sector.

Commissioning for equity. Inequalities in access to revascularisation in the NHS and in the independent sector. A technical report

This document describes the methodology for examining inequalities in access to revascularisation in the NHS and in the independent sector. It is a technical report.

Commissioning for equity. Equal access, equal care? Main report

This report has been produced by the London Health Observatory (LHO) for the London Development Centre to provide a London baseline for monitoring specific actions in the Delivering Race Equality (DRE) action plan . The report summarises the findings of an analysis of the information collected from all of London's nine Mental Health NHS providers, and 22 independent providers for the national census of inpatients in mental health hospitals and facilities in England and Wales on 31 March 2005.

Commissioning for equity. Equal access, equal care? Can London deliver the race equality action plan for mental health? Executive summary

This report has been produced by the London Health Observatory (LHO) for the London Development Centre to provide a London baseline for monitoring specific actions in the Delivering Race Equality (DRE) action plan. The report summarises the findings of an analysis of the information collected from all of London's nine Mental Health NHS providers, and 22 independent providers for the national census of inpatients in mental health hospitals and facilities in England and Wales on 31 March 2005 .

Implication des hôpitaux en évaluation des technologies de la santé : quel rôle pour les hôpitaux? : éléments théoriques et enquête auprès d'établissements suisses et québécois

Le présent mémoire traite de l'implication des hôpitaux universitaires en évaluation des technologies de la santé. Le champ d'étude est vaste : - L'évaluation des technologies de la santé est une discipline dont l'étendue fait appel aux sciences exactes (physique, statistiques, ingénierie, méthodologie de la recherche analytique, etc.) ainsi qu'aux sciences sociales (économie, éthique, etc.) - L'hôpital universitaire est une organisation des plus complexes qui soit. Le "produit final" - l'amélioration de la santé du patient - est totalement non standardisé, il n'existe pas de modèle d'hôpital universitaire type et unique (inclusion ou non d'un centre de recherche, d'une faculté de médecine, d'un comité de gestion politique, etc.) et les corps de métiers qui le composent sont des plus variés et représentés en grand nombre Ainsi, l'étendue du champ relève des domaines interdépendants tels que la technologie (elle-même incluse dans le domaine de l'innovation aujourd'hui en développement), le management (ou administration des soins, du système de santé dans lequel s'inscrit l'hôpital universitaire), le financement de l'institution (mais aussi la rémunération des professionnels) et enfin la stratégie de l'hôpital. Le présent travail ne fait qu'effleurer ce large spectre d'investigation. La thématique de l'évaluation des technologies de la santé n'est guère connue en Suisse, ou plutôt elle n'est que peu développée et reconnue comme une science interdisciplinaire destinée à porter un jugement de valeur afin d'aider la prise de décision, sens profond qui la définit dans d'autres pays tel le Canada et plus particulièrement le Québec. Enfin, il convient de souligner que le présent travail n'a pas comme objectif de comparer les systèmes de santé québécois et suisse ou de réaliser toute autre critique de l'un ou de l'autre. Le but du stage ([à l'Université de Montréal], cf. Préambule) était d'observer des structures reconnues au niveau international et nullement de juger de l'ensemble du système de santé. Si l'on peut s'inspirer des réussites ailleurs, il convient de s'en tenir à l'inspiration de celles-ci pour ensuite, éventuellement, les contextualiser dans d'autres lieux. Ainsi, à chaque fois qu'il sera fait mention du Québec par la suite, ce sera dans l'intention de démontrer l'originalité de la démarche et d'élargir le débat dans le contexte qui nous intéresse. [Auteur p. 7]

World class healthcare for London. Mind the gap! A briefing on equity of health and healthcare in the capital

This briefing provides an overview of equity of access to some of the essential elements of healthcare in the capital

Commissioning for equity. Stop gaps: equity of access to London's stop smoking services

This briefing looks at who is making use of NHS stop smoking services in the London area.

Making the case: Health Equity Audit

A briefing aiming to provide guidance to the NHS and local government on undertaking HEA. Aims to increase understanding of the impact of social, economic and environmental influences on health and health inequalities, and to promote effective action.

Supporting Equity in Higher Education

The rationale for this review centres solely on the need to broaden access to third-level education in order to improve equity and social justice. It is founded on the Government’s social and economic policy objective of reducing and eliminating educational disadvantage, and increasing participation at third level by lower socio-economic groups. The Agreed Programme for Government of June 2002 commits the Government to building a caring and inclusive society and to achieving real and sustained social progress. Similar commitments are reflected in the National Development Plan, the National Anti-Poverty Strategy, the National Children’s Strategy and successive national partnership agreements, including Sustaining Progress. Tackling educational disadvantage is a core principle of social justice. The issues of educational disadvantage and social inclusion, therefore, are key priorities for the Government and, since taking up office, the Minister for Education and Science has emphasised his commitment to improving participation and achievement at every level of education. The need for interventions throughout the education system is well recognised. It is well established that addressing educational disadvantage requires intervention in the context of a continuum of provision from early childhood through to adulthood. Successive governments, of all political persuasions, have recognised this fact and have introduced a range of initiatives at pre-primary, primary and post-primary levels aimed at increasing pupil retention and achievement. These initiatives are currently being reviewed in order to ensure that individuals are enabled to obtain the appropriate supports they require to maximise the benefit they derive from the education system.

West Belfast Eye Health Equity Profile

The West Belfast Eye Health Equity Profile is a working report designed to inform the development of the Community Engagement Project (CEP) for the RNIB and provide information for a wider Eye Health Strategy for the Public Health Agency (PHA) and the Health�and Social Care Board (HSCB) with the aim of improving the equity, outcomes and quality of life for people with or at risk of poor eye health.

Douleurs neuropathiques : quelques pistes pour une évaluation structurée et une prise en charge spécifique et globale [Neuropathic pain: tips and tools for specific and comprehensive pain management]

Les syndromes neuropathiques sont caractérisés par une douleur d'intensité élevée, de longue durée et résistante aux analgésiques classiques. De fait, il existe un risque important de répercussions sur la vie et le bien-être des patients. A travers une vignette clinique, cet article abordera le diagnostic, le traitement spécifique et l'impact de la douleur neuropathique sur la qualité de vie et les conséquences psychologiques associées, comme la dépression et l'anxiété. Nous présenterons des outils validés qui permettent d'objectiver la composante neuropathique aux douleurs et les comorbidités psychiatriques associées. Cette évaluation globale favorise un meilleur dialogue avec les patients ainsi que l'élaboration de stratégies thérapeutiques, notamment par le biais d'antidépresseurs, dont l'efficacité sera discutée en fin d'article. Neuropathic pain syndromes are characterized by intense and long lasting pain that is resistant to usual analgesics. Patients are therefore at high risk of decreased quality of life and impaired well-being. Using a case report, we will consider in this article the diagnosis and treatment of neuropathic pain as well as its impact on the quality of life including psychological consequences such as depression and anxiety. We will present simple and reliable scales that can help the general practitioner evaluate the neuropathic component of the pain syndrome and its related psychiatric co-morbidities. This comprehensive approach to pain management should facilitate communication with the patient and help the practitioner select the most appropriate therapeutic strategy, notably the prescription of antidepressants, the efficacy of which we will discuss at the end of the article.