1962 University of Michigan Baseball Team

Front Row: Dennis Spalla, Dick Honig, John Kerr, coach Don Lund, Joe Merullo, Wayne Slusher, Dave Roebuck,

Second Row: manager Bruce Kropschat, Dick Post, Joe Jones, Ron Tate, Jim Newman, assistant coach Moby Benedict,

Back Row:Jim Steckley, Jim Bobel, Ron Lauterbach, Bob Dunston, Dave Campbell, Fritz Fisher, Harvey Chapman,

Missing: Ed Hood

1962 University of Michigan Baseball Team

Front Row: Dennis Spalla, Dick Honig, John Kerr, coach Don Lund, Joe Merullo, Wayne Slusher, Dave Roebuck,

Second Row: manager Bruce Kropschat, Dick Post, Joe Jones, Ron Tate, Jim Newman, assistant coach Moby Benedict,

Back Row:Jim Steckley, Jim Bobel, Ron Lauterbach, Bob Dunston, Dave Campbell, Fritz Fisher, Harvey Chapman,

Missing: Ed Hood

1963 University of Michigan Baseball Team

Front Row: Dave Roebuck, Dick Paar, captain Joe Jones, coach Moby Benedict, Dave Campbell, Jim Newman, Dennis Spalla,

Middle Row: manager Winston Payne, Dick Honig, Fritz Fisher, Wayne Slusher, Pete Adams, Clyde Barnhart, Marlin Pemberton,

Back Row: Jim Steckley, Jim Bobel, Harvey Chapman, Jerry Hribar, Charles Adams, Ron Tate, George Skaff

1962 University of Michigan Baseball Team returning from Japan

On stair, top to bottom: Jim Bobel, Dave Campbell, Wayne Slusher, Fritz Fisher, Harvey Chapman, Joe Jones, Joe Merullo, Ron Tate

On ground, L-R: Don Lund, Dave Roebuck, Jim Steckley, Ed Hood, John Kerr, Denny Spalla, Dick Post, Ron Lauterbeck

School of Nursing Class of 1994

Top Row: Laura Anderson, Sherry Armstrong, Sarah Arnoldi, Rosalie Arzadon, Leslie Bair, Angela Baker, Kristy Barker, Elizabeth Barrios, Tamara J. Becker, Kristen Bekker, Kathryn Birkmeier, Lucinda Brach, Stacy Brege, Pamela K. Burke, Nicole Bushey

Row 2: Nancy Byington, Heidi Campbell, Jason Patton, Jodi Kaplan, Dawn Buhl, Colleen Carolan, Elizabeth Conklin, Krisanne Kircos, Margie Tucker, Jennifer Sanders, Angela Vitale, Kathleen S. Kemp, Tom Atkinson, Tanya M. Cerbins, Tamra Chute

Row 3: Kirsten A. Covell, Michelle Currie, Kristina Davis, Albert Deogracias, Deana Diokno, Elizabeth Donovan, Kathryn Drobitch, Andrea Dunbar, Carol Dunlap, Kelley Dutcheshen

Row 4: Shannon Fitzpatrick, Tracy Fouchey, Carol Gerstner, Holly Gray, Jacqueline Hair, Lisa Hart, Kristen Hawley, Joanna Hesford, Nicole Hill, Denise Hines, Matthew Hoffmann, Christa Holland

Row 5: Debra Horvath, Lisa Hottmann, Paul Howell, Susan Isley, Violet H. Barkauskas, Elisabeth Pennington, Rhetaugh G. Dumas, Janice Lindberg, Beverly Jones, Susie Jahan, Denielle Jordan, Kellie Kennon, Hanah Kiernan

Row 6: Sally A. Klyn, Ellen Kraft, Sheri Kurashige, Nancy Kushman, Jeannine Marie LaDouceur, Opal Lesse, Heather Joy Lirette, Dana Lloyd, Eileen Mac Innis, Sara MacKeigan, Marilyn Martin, Stephanie Martino, Lynette May, Amy Marie Mazur, Tracy McIntyre, Amy Marie McManur

Row 7: Lynne Michalski, Jennie Mille, Jennifer Moran, Marvella M. Muzik, Tara Nichols, Teri Nies, Maria Nistal, Lori Olivet, Constance Paglis, Andrea Pelham-Reichel, Michelle Perkins, Barbara persensky, Julianne Plaza, Sonia Prichard, Sarah Prush

Row 8: Michael Ranieri, Shanda Richards, Carleen Roberts, Marie Antoinette Robinson, Kelly A. Saran, Deborah Saunders, Christine Sawicki, Donna Schaldenbrand, Noelle Schellig, Marci Simon, Colleen Sirhal, Kathryn Smay, Susan Snyr, Diane Sobecki, Wendy Stevens, Carolyn A. Storck

Row 9: Maria Tandoc, Linda Tate, Nicole Theodore, William Troy, Diana Underwood, Maria Villegas, Jennifer Vite, Marianne Weir, Kelly Whitman, Angela Willbrandt, Wendy Winkler, Yvette Wright, Jill Yatcho, Catherine Zawacki, Theresa Zeiler

R.G. Peters Plant at Eastlake, Manistee County, MI

from left: 1 - Wm. Tate, conductor, on pilot [others unidentified]

Engine 5, July 1911 (see neg 278b in box 2): crew left to right: Enos DeYoung, engineer; Niel McClein, conductor; Neil B. McLean, brakeman; Ike Shaefer, fireman; George Albertson, brakeman

from left: 1 - Wm. Tate, conductor, on pilot [others unidentified]

Locomotive with MTRR on fender, 3 men on ground, 4 on wood pile, 2 on flat car

from left: 1 - Wm. Tate, conductor, on pilot [others unidentified]

Engine crew with log train, one man raising hat (names inscribed on reverse)

from left: 1 - Wm. Tate, conductor, on pilot [others unidentified]

Five men clustered around engine #2, long train of loaded log cars curving along track behind

from left: 1 - Wm. Tate, conductor, on pilot [others unidentified]

National Gallery, Millbank, illustrations.

Includes index.

Mammals of the Pacific world /

Mode of access: Internet.

Verbal recall after mild traumatic brain injury: Sensitivity of the rapid screen of concussion

The present study aimed to determine whether including a sensitive test of immediate and delayed recall would improve the diagnostic validity of the Rapid Screen of Concussion (RSC) in mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) versus orthopaedic clinical samples. Two studies were undertaken. In Study 1, the performance of 156 mTBI and 145 orthopaedic participants was analysed to identify the number of individuals who performed at ceiling on the verbal memory subtest of the RSC, as this test required immediate and delayed recall of only five words. A second aim was to determine the sensitivity and specificity levels of the RSC. Study 2 aimed to examine whether replacement of the verbal memory subtest with the 12-word Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) could improve the sensitivity of the RSC in a new sample of 26 mTBI and 30 orthopaedic participants. Both studies showed that orthopaedic participants outperformed mTBI participants on each of the selected measures. Study 1 showed that 14% of mTBI participants performed at ceiling on the immediate and 21.2% on delayed recall test. Performance on the original battery yielded a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 80% and overall correct classification of 81.5% participants. In Study 2, inclusion of the HVLT improved sensitivity to a level of 88.5%, decreased specificity to a level of 70% and resulted in an overall classification rate of 80%. It was concluded that although inclusion of the five-word subtest in the RSC can successfully distinguish concussed from non-concussed individuals, use of the HVLT in this protocol yields a more sensitive measure of subtle cognitive deficits following mTBI.

Practical considerations for the measurement of free light chains in serum

Background: A new immunoassay for free light chain measurements has been reported to be useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of monoclonal light chain diseases and nonsecretory myeloma. We describe experience with and some potential pitfalls of the assay. Methods: The assay was assessed for precision, sample type and stability, recovery, and harmonization of results between two analyzers on which the reagents are used. Free-light-chain concentrations were measured in healthy individuals (to determine biological variation), patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, myeloma patients after autologous stem cell transplants, and patients with renal disease. Results: Analytical imprecision (CV) was 6-11% for kappa and A free-light-chain measurement and 16% for the calculated kappa/lambda ratio. Biological variation was generally insignificant compared with analytical variation. Despite the same reagent source, values were not completely harmonized between assay systems and may produce discordant free-light-chain ratios. In some patients with clinically stable myeloma, or post transplantation, or with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, free-light-chain concentration and ratio were within the population reference interval despite the presence of monoclonal intact immunoglobulin in serum. In other patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, values were abnormal although there was no clinical evidence of progression to multiple myeloma. Conclusions: The use of free-light-chain measurements alone cannot differentiate some groups of patients with monoclonal gammopathy from healthy individuals. As with the introduction of any new test, it is essential that more scientific data about use of this assay in different subject groups are available so that results can be interpreted with clinical certainty. (C) 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.