A interdisciplinaridade no ensino da matemática pela perspectiva da pedagogia histórico-crítica: superando a pedagogia de projetos

Pós-graduação em Docência para a Educação Básica - FC

Formação de professores das séries iniciais: o pedagogo em questão

Pós-graduação em Educação para a Ciência - FC

O estágio supervisionado da educação infantil no curso de Pedagogia da FCT/UNESP: a práxis na visão dos alunos

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Den utvärdera(n)de staten : Utvärderingens institutionalisering på den högre utbildningens område

In recent years evaluation has become a very important element in the public administration. The Swedish state administration to a significant extent both evaluates and is evaluated. This means that the evaluating state is at the same time the evaluated state. In this dissertation the institutionalization of evaluation is studied in a field within which this development has been particularly lively and interesting, namely the field of higher education. The dissertation focuses on evaluation activity that has been carried out in conjunction with central public authorities within higher education: the Office of the Chancellor of the Universities and Colleges in Sweden, the National Swedish Board of Universities and Colleges, and the Office of the University Chancellor, and encompasses the period 1964-1995. A newly revived research tradition within political science – historical institutionalism – is used as a perspective and a methodology. Since the application of this tradition has not yet been fully tested, another purpose is to examine the practical utility of this analytical tool and the kind of knowledge that it produces. The dissertation thereby combines the fields of education policy, evaluation research and institutional theory. The beginning of the institution has been dated to the end of the 1960s and beginning of the 1970s. In the dissertation the forces behind the initiation of the institution are taken up. Events and developments in the field that have influenced the further development of the institution have been identified and analyzed. Developments reveal that the institution has been stable during the entire period of time under study, despite some changes. The use of historical institutionalism as a perspective and methodology has proven satisfactory on a general level. However, special solutions have been required as problems and ambiguities have arisen. The dissertation concludes with reflections on the practical utility of historical institutionalism in political science research.

Effect of implementing project-based education in high school physics : file folder bridge engineering

Project-based education and portfolio assessments are at the forefront of educational research. This research follows the implementation of a project-based unit in a high school physics class. Students played the role of an engineering firm who designed, built and tested file folder bridges. The purpose was to determine if projectbased learning could improve student attitude toward science and related careers like engineering. Teams of students presented their work in a portfolio for a final assessment of the process of designing, building and testing their bridges.

Evaluation of leaders – does gender still matter?

Purpose: Leadership positions are still stereotyped as male, especially in male-dominated fields such as STEM. Therefore, women in such positions run the risk of being evaluated less favorably than men. Our study investigates how female and male leaders in existing teams (engineering project) are evaluated, and how these evaluations change over time. Design/Methodology: Participants worked in 45 teams to develop specific engineering projects. Evaluations of 45 leaders (33% women) by 258 team members (39% women) were analyzed, that is, leaders’ self-evaluation and their evaluation by team members. Results: Although female and male leaders did not differ in their self-evaluations at the beginning of the project, female leaders evaluated themselves better within time. However, team members evaluated female leaders better than male leaders at the beginning of the project. These gender differences disappeared over the time. Limitations: It should be replicated in a non-student sample. Implications: The results show that female leaders entering a male-dominated field (engineering) are evaluated better by team members than male leaders at the beginning of the team work, in line with the ‘shifting standard model’ (Biernat & Fuegen, 2001). While the initial impression formation of female and male leaders is influenced by category membership, its impact decreases over time as a consequence of individualization (Fiske & Neuberg, 1990); this results in similar evaluations over time. Originality: To our knowledge this is the first study to systematically test perceptions of change in the evaluation over time of female and male leaders in natural setting.

Evaluation of Leaders – Does Gender Really Matter?

We examined the leaders’ self-evaluation and their evaluation by subordinates. We found that, over time, female leaders evaluated themselves better than male leaders and that subordinates evaluated female leaders better than male leaders at the beginning of the project. The latter gender differences disappeared over the course of the project.

PARTICIPAÇÃO POPULAR NA ELABORAÇÃO DO PLANO DIRETOR DE JOANÓPOLIS ASPECTOS SOCIOEDUCATIVOS DO PROCESSO

Este trabalho busca descrever o processo de mobilização da população da cidade de Joanópolis - S.P., com vistas à participação na elaboração do Plano Diretor da cidade. Do mesmo modo, busca compreender os principais pressupostos teóricos necessários à elaboração de processos de educação social que garantam a construção coletiva de políticas públicas. A metodologia utilizada neste trabalho é de caráter qualitativo, que tanto permite o tratamento objetivo dos dados da ação quanto acolhe a parte ativa das tomadas de decisão. A contribuição deste trabalho reside em partilhar a elaboração de uma metodologia sócioeducativa que possa ser utilizada por agentes político-pedagógicos na elaboração de Planos Diretores,notadamente em cidades pequenas e médias.

PARTICIPAÇÃO POPULAR NA ELABORAÇÃO DO PLANO DIRETOR DE JOANÓPOLIS ASPECTOS SOCIOEDUCATIVOS DO PROCESSO

Este trabalho busca descrever o processo de mobilização da população da cidade de Joanópolis - S.P., com vistas à participação na elaboração do Plano Diretor da cidade. Do mesmo modo, busca compreender os principais pressupostos teóricos necessários à elaboração de processos de educação social que garantam a construção coletiva de políticas públicas. A metodologia utilizada neste trabalho é de caráter qualitativo, que tanto permite o tratamento objetivo dos dados da ação quanto acolhe a parte ativa das tomadas de decisão. A contribuição deste trabalho reside em partilhar a elaboração de uma metodologia sócioeducativa que possa ser utilizada por agentes político-pedagógicos na elaboração de Planos Diretores,notadamente em cidades pequenas e médias.

Diseño y validación de una escala de autoevaluación de competencias digitales para estudiantes de Pedagogía

Este trabajo presenta el proceso de validación de una Escala de Autoevaluación de competencias digitales para estudiantes de Pedagogía. La estructura del instrumento contempla cinco dimensiones: Pedagógica - Social, Ética y Legal - Técnica - Gestión Escolar y Desarrollo Profesional. El procedimiento consideró la validación de contenido, validación de constructo a través del Análisis Factorial y la determinación de fiabilidad a través del alfa de Cronbach. La escala se aplicó a una muestra de 161 estudiantes de Pedagogía de la Universidad del Bío-Bío (Chile) que habían comenzado la actividad de práctica profesional. El proceso desarrollado permitió dar validez científica al instrumento diseñado.

The Silent Reform of Swiss Federalism: The New Constitutional Articles on Education

This article examines the decision-making process leading to the new constitutional articles on education in Switzerland. It analyzes how actors from both state levels (Confederation and cantons) could reach consensus in a process that was prone to a "joint-decision trap". To that end, we hypothesize which factors may be conducive to a "problem-solving" style of policy-making in a compulsory negotiation system. Rich empirical material from various sources supports our theoretical arguments: We show that shared beliefs and a common frame of reference, the procedural separation between constitutional and distributional issues, neutral brokers, and informal structures were all beneficial to the success of the reform project.