TiO2/PDMS nanocomposites for use on self-cleaning surfaces

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Critical Water Effect on the Plasmon Band and Visible Light Activity of Au/ZnO Nanocomposites

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Polymer-clay nanocomposites thermal stability: experimental evidence of the radical trapping effect

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

The impact of the addition of iodoform on the physicochemical properties of an epoxy-based endodontic sealer

Due to the low radiopacity of Sealer 26, iodoform is frequently empirically added to this sealer. Thus, the interference of this procedure with the physicochemical properties of Sealer 26 must be evaluated. Objective: This study evaluated the influence of the addition of iodoform on setting time, flow, solubility, pH, and calcium release of an epoxy-based sealer. Material and Methods: The control group was pure Sealer 26, and the experimental groups were Sealer 26 added with 1.1 g, 0.55 g or 0.275 g of iodoform. Setting time evaluation was performed in accordance with the ASTM C266-03 speciflcation. The analysis of flow and solubility was in accordance with the ISO 6876-2001 speciflcation. For the evaluation of pH and calcium ion release, polyethylene tubes were filled with the materials and immersed in flasks with 10 ml of deionized water. After 24 h, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 45 days pH was measured. In 45 days, the calcium released was evaluated with an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Results: The addition of iodoform increased setting time in comparison with pure sealer (P < 0.05). As for flow, solubility, and calcium release, the mixtures presented results similar to pure sealer (p > 0.05). In the 24 h period, the mixture with 1.1 g and 0.55 g of iodoform showed lower pH than pure sealer and than sealer added with 0.275 g of iodoform (P < 0.05). Conclusions: The iodoform added to Sealer 26 interferes with its setting time and solubility properties. Further studies are needed to address the clinical signiflcance of this interference.

Nanostructured Composites Based on Carbon Nanotubes and Epoxy Resin for Use as Radar Absorbing Materials

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Nanocomposites of natural rubber and polyaniline-modified cellulose nanofibrils

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Effect of fiber orientation on the shear behavior of glass fiber/epoxy composites

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Influence of cellulose nanofibrils on soft and hard segments of polyurethane/cellulose nanocomposites and effect of humidity on their mechanical properties

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Nanocomposites based on LbL films of polyaniline and sodium montmorillonite clay

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Silver Molybdate and Silver Tungstate Nanocomposites with Enhanced Photoluminescence

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Nanocomposites based on bacterial cellulose in combination with osteogenic growth peptide for bone repair: cytotoxic, genotoxic and mutagenic evaluations

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Evaluation of modified silica nanoparticles in carboxylated nitrile rubber nanocomposites

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Structural and functional characterization of barium zirconium titanate/epoxy composites

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Mechanical, thermal, and barrier properties of methylcellulose/cellulose nanocrystals nanocomposites

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Interference of the assessment method in pH values of an epoxy-based cement

Introduction: Alkalinization potential is a fundamental property of endodontic epoxy-based cements containing calcium hydroxide. Studies have shown discrepant pH results for same materials at different evaluation periods. A possible reason accounting for these differences may be the assessment procedures. Objective: To evaluate the pH value of an epoxy-based cement (Sealer 26) in different periods of analysis, using two assessment methods. Material and methods: Sealer 26 was manipulated and immediately placed into polyethylene tubes (n=10, each group) and immersed in distilled water. In G1, the tubes were kept in the same water during all experiment; and in G2, the tubes were removed and placed into another flask with an equal amount of water after the pH evaluation. The pH of these solutions was measured at 24 hours, 7, 14 and 28 days. Analysis were made within the same group according to the experimental periods and between groups in each experimental period. Data were submitted to ANOVA (α = 5%) and t test, respectively. Results: For G1 and G2, all periods showed different pH values (p < 0.05), except between 14 and 28 days (p > 0.05) and between 7 and 14 days (p > 0.05), respectively. In each period, no significant differences were observed between the groups. Conclusion: The method to obtain the pH values in different experimental periods no interfered in the final results. However, difference was observed when the results were analyzed at same group.