The global optimization of phase-incoherent signals

The problem of global optimization of M phase-incoherent signals in N complex dimensions is formulated. Then, by using the geometric approach of Landau and Slepian, conditions for optimality are established for N = 2 and the optimal signal sets are determined for M = 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12.

The method is the following: The signals are assumed to be equally probable and to have equal energy, and thus are represented by points ṡ_i, i = 1, 2, …, M, on the unit sphere S₁ in C^N. If W_ik is the halfspace determined by ṡ_i and ṡ_k and containing ṡ_i, i.e. W_ik = {ṙϵC^N:| ≥ | ˂ṙ, ṡ_k˃|}, then the Ʀ_i = ∩/k≠i W_ik, i = 1, 2, …, M, the maximum likelihood decision regions, partition S₁. For additive complex Gaussian noise ṅ and a received signal ṙ = ṡ_ie^jϴ + ṅ, where ϴ is uniformly distributed over [0, 2π], the probability of correct decoding is P_C = 1/π^N ∞/ʃ/0 r^2N-1e^-(r2+1)U(r)dr, where U(r) = 1/M M/Ʃ/i=1 Ʀ_i ʃ/∩ S₁ I₀(2r | ˂ṡ, ṡ_i˃|)dσ(ṡ), and r = ǁṙǁ.

For N = 2, it is proved that U(r) ≤ ʃ/C_α I₀(2r|˂ṡ, ṡ_i˃|)dσ(ṡ) – 2K/M. h(1/2K [Mσ(C_α)-σ(S₁)]), where C_α = {ṡϵS₁:|˂ṡ, ṡ_i˃| ≥ α}, K is the total number of boundaries of the net on S₁ determined by the decision regions, and h is the strictly increasing strictly convex function of σ(C_α∩W), (where W is a halfspace not containing ṡ_i), given by h = ʃ/C_α∩W I₀ (2r|˂ṡ, ṡ_i˃|)dσ(ṡ). Conditions for equality are established and these give rise to the globally optimal signal sets for M = 2, 3, 4, 6, and 12.

Physiological modules for generating discrete and rhythmic movements: Component analysis of EMG signals

A central question in Neuroscience is that of how the nervous system generates the spatiotemporal commands needed to realize complex gestures, such as handwriting. A key postulate is that the central nervous system (CNS) builds up complex movements from a set of simpler motor primitives or control modules. In this study we examined the control modules underlying the generation of muscle activations when performing different types of movement: discrete, point-to-point movements in eight different directions and continuous figure-eight movements in both the normal, upright orientation and rotated 90 degrees. To test for the effects of biomechanical constraints, movements were performed in the frontal-parallel or sagittal planes, corresponding to two different nominal flexion/abduction postures of the shoulder. In all cases we measured limb kinematics and surface electromyographic activity (EMB) signals for seven different muscles acting around the shoulder. We first performed principal component analysis (PCA) of the EMG signals on a movement-by-movement basis. We found a surprisingly consistent pattern of muscle groupings across movement types and movement planes, although we could detect systematic differences between the PCs derived from movements performed in each sholder posture and between the principal components associated with the different orientations of the figure. Unexpectedly we found no systematic differences between the figute eights and the point-to-point movements. The first three principal components could be associated with a general co-contraction of all seven muscles plus two patterns of reciprocal activatoin. From these results, we surmise that both "discrete-rhythmic movements" such as the figure eight, and discrete point-to-point movement may be constructed from three different fundamental modules, one regulating the impedance of the limb over the time span of the movement and two others operating to generate movement, one aligned with the vertical and the other aligned with the horizontal.