226 resultados para Tlr4
Resumo:
Septic shock can occur as a result of Gram-negative or Gram-positive infection and involves a complex interaction between bacterial factors and the host immune system producing a systemic inflammatory state that may progress to multiple organ failure and death. Gram-positive bacteria are increasingly becoming more prevalent especially Staphylococcus epidermidis in association with indwelling devices. Lipopolysaccaride (LPS) is the key Gram-negative component involved in this process, but it is not clear which components of Gram-positive bacteria are responsible for progression of this often fatal disease. The aim of this thesis was to investigate the effect of bacterial components on the immune systems. Lipid S, a short chain form of lipoteichoic acid (LTA) found to be excreted from bacteria during growth in culture medium was examined along with other Gram-positive cell wall components: LTA, peptidoglycan (PG) and wall teichoic acids (WTA) and LPS from Gram-negative bacteria. Lipid S, LTA, PG and LPS but not WTA all stimulated murine macrophages and cell lines to produce significant amounts of NO, TNF-a, IL-6 and IL-1 and would induce fever and tissue damage seen in inflammatory diseases. Lipid S proved to be the most potent out of the Gram-positive samples tested. IgG antibodies in patients serum were found to bind to and cross react with lipid S and LTA. Anti-inflammatory antibiotics, platelet activating factor (PAF), PAF receptor antagonists and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed to LTA, CD14 and toll-like receptors were utilised to modulate cytokine and NO production. In cell culture the anti-LTA and the anti-CD14 mAbs failed to markedly attenuate the production of NO, TNF-a, IL-6 or IL-1, the anti-TLR4 antibody did greatly inhibit the ability of LPS to stimulate cytokine production but not lipid S. The tetracyclines proved to be the most effective compounds, many were active at low concentrations and showed efficacy to inhibit both lipid S and LPS stimulated macrophages to produce NO.
Resumo:
Background Atherosclerosis is potentiated by stimulation of Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which serve to detect pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). However little is known of which PAMPs may be present in atheroma, or capable of stimulating inflammatory signalling in vascular cells. Materials and Methods DNA extracted from human carotid atheroma samples was amplified and sequenced using broad-range 16S gene specific primers to establish historical exposure to bacterial PAMPs. Responsiveness of primary human arterial and venous endothelial and smooth muscle cells to PAMPs specific for each of the TLRs was assessed by measurement of interleukin-8 secretion and E-selectin expression. Results Extracts of atheromatous tissue stimulated little or no signalling in TLR-transfected HEK-293 cells. However, sequencing of bacterial DNA amplified from carotid atheroma revealed the presence of DNA from 17 different bacterial genera, suggesting historical exposure to bacterial lipopeptide, lipopolysaccharide and flagellin. All cells examined were responsive to the ligands of TLR3 and TLR4, poly inosine:cytosine and lipopolysaccharide. Arterial cells were responsive to a wider range of PAMPs than venous cells, being additionally responsive to bacterial flagellin and unmethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanosine DNA motifs, the ligands of TLR5 and TLR9, respectively. Cells were generally unresponsive towards the ligands of human TLR7 and TLR8, loxoribine and single stranded RNA. Only coronary artery endothelial cells expressed TLR2 mRNA and responded to the TLR2 ligand Pam3CSK4. Conclusions Vascular cells are responsive to a relatively diverse range of TLR ligands and may be exposed, at least transiently, to ligands of TLR2, TLR4, TLR5 and TLR9 during the development of carotid atheroma.
Resumo:
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which generally activates Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), is expressed on commensal colonic bacteria. In a number of tissues, LPS can act directly on epithelial cells to increase paracellular permeability. Such an effect in the colon would have an important impact on the understanding of normal homeostasis and of pathology. Our aim was to use a novel primary culture of colonic epithelial cells grown on Transwells to investigate whether LPS, or Pam(3)CSK( 4), an activator of TLR2, affected paracellular permeability. Consequently, [(14)C]-mannitol transfer and transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) were measured. The preparation consisted primarily of cytokeratin-18 positive epithelial cells that produced superoxide, stained for mucus with periodic acid-Schiff reagent, exhibited alkaline phosphatase activity and expressed TLR2 and TLR4. Tight junctions and desmosomes were visible by transmission electron microscopy. Basally, but not apically, applied LPS from Escherichia coli increased the permeability to mannitol and to a 10-kDa dextran, and reduced TEER. The LPS from Helicobacter pylori increased paracellular permeability of gastric cells when applied either apically or basally, in contrast to colon cells, where this LPS was active only from the basal aspect. A pan-caspase inhibitor prevented the increase in caspase activity caused by basal E. coli LPS, and reduced the effects of LPS on paracellular permeability. Synthetic Pam(3)CSK(4) in the basal compartment prevented all effects of basal E. coli LPS. In conclusion, LPS applied to the base of the colonic epithelial cells increased paracellular permeability by a mechanism involving caspase activation, suggesting a process by which perturbation of the gut barrier could be exacerbated. Moreover, activation of TLR2 ameliorated such effects.
Resumo:
Cell death and removal of cell corpses in a timely manner is a key event in both physiological and pathological situations including tissue homeostasis and the resolution of inflammation. Phagocytic clearance of cells dying by apoptosis is a complex sequential process comprising attraction, recognition, tethering, signalling and ultimately phagocytosis and degradation of cell corpses. A wide range of molecules acting as apoptotic cell-associated ligands, phagocyte-associated receptors or soluble bridging molecules have been implicated within this process. The role of myeloid cell CD14 in mediating apoptotic cell interactions with macrophages has long been known though key molecules and residues involved have not been defined. Here we sought to further dissect the function of CD14 in apoptotic cell clearance. A novel panel of THP-1 cell-derived phagocytes was employed to demonstrate that CD14 mediates effective apoptotic cell interactions with macrophages in the absence of detectable TLR4 whilst binding and responsiveness to LPS requires TLR4. Using a targeted series of CD14 point mutants expressed in non-myeloid cells we reveal CD14 residue 11 as key in the binding of apoptotic cells whilst other residues are reported as key for LPS binding. Importantly we note that expression of CD14 in non-myeloid cells confers the ability to bind rapidly to apoptotic cells. Analysis of a panel of epithelial cells reveals that a number naturally express CD14 and that this is competent to mediate apoptotic cell clearance. Taken together these data suggest that CD14 relies on residue 11 for apoptotic cell tethering and it may be an important tethering molecule on so called 'non-professional' phagocytes thus contributing to apoptotic cell clearance in a non-myeloid setting. Furthermore these data establish CD14 as a rapid-acting tethering molecule, expressed in monocytes, which may thus confer responsiveness of circulating monocytes to apoptotic cell derived material. © 2013 Thomas et al.
Resumo:
Recent studies have shown that Toll-like receptor (TLR)- signalling contributes significantly to the inflammatory events of atherosclerosis. As products of cholesterol oxidation (oxysterols) accumulate within atherosclerotic plaque and have been proposed to contribute to inflammatory signalling in the diseased artery, we investigated the potential of 7-ketocholesterol (7-KC), 7β-hydroxycholesterol (7β-HC) and 25-hydroxycholesterol (25-HC) to stimulate inflammatory signalling via the lipid-recognising TLRs 1, 2, 4 and 6. Each oxysterol stimulated secretion of the inflammatory chemokine interleukin-8 (IL-8), but not I?B degradation or tumour necrosis factor- release from monocytic THP-1 cells. Transfection of TLR-deficient HEK-293 cells with TLRs 1, 2, 4 or 6 did not increase sensitivity to the tested oxysterols. Moreover, blockade of TLR2 or TLR4 with specific inhibitors did not reduce 25-hydroxycholesterol (25-HC) induced IL-8 release from THP-1 cells. We conclude that although the oxysterols examined in this study may contribute to increased expression of certain inflammatory genes, this occurs by mechanisms independent of TLR signalling.
Resumo:
To determine whether non-enterobacterial endotoxins, which are likely to constitute the majority of the circulating endotoxin pool, may stimulate coronary artery endothelial cell activation. Interleukin-8 secretion, monocyte adhesion, and E-selectin expression were measured in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs) challenged in vitro with highly purified endotoxins of common host colonisers Escherichia coli, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacteroides fragilis. HCAECs but not HUVECs expressed Toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 and were responsive to non-enterobacterial endotoxins. Transfection of TLR-deficient HEK-293 cells with TLR2 or TLR4/MD2 revealed that while E. coli endotoxin utilised solely TLR4 to signal, the endotoxins, deglycosylated endotoxins (lipid-A), and whole heat-killed bacteria of the other species stimulated TLR2-but not TLR4-dependent cell-signalling. Blockade of TLR2 with neutralizing antibody prevented HCAEC activation by non-enterobacterial endotoxins. Comparison of each endotoxin with E. coli endotoxin in limulus amoebocyte lysate assay revealed that the non-enterobacterial endotoxins are greatly underestimated by this assay, which has been used in all previous studies to estimate plasma endotoxin concentrations. Circulating non-enterobacterial endotoxins may be an underestimated contributor to endothelial activation and atherosclerosis in individuals at risk of increased plasma endotoxin burden.
Resumo:
Toll-like receptor (TLR)-4 signalling has been shown to accelerate atherosclerosis. As oxidised phospholipids are present in atherosclerotic plaque and have been shown to modulate TLR4 signalling, we investigated the role of oxidised 1-palmitoyl-2-arachidonyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphorylcholine (OxPAPC) in the regulation of TLR 1, 2, 4 and 6 signalling. Unlike established TLR agonists, OxPAPC did not induce NF-?B-dependent gene expression in monocytic THP-1 cells, human aortic endothelial cells or TLR-deficient HEK-293 cells transfected with TLRs 1, 2, 4 or 6. OxPAPC induction of IL-8 was not blocked by the TLR4 specific antagonist Rhodobacter sphaeroides LPS in human aortic endothelial cells, though OxPAPC potently inhibited TLR4 mediated IL-8 induction in these cells. OxPAPC upregulated IL-8 production in TLR4 deficient HEK-293 cells and this was not increased following TLR4 overexpression. Lipids extracted from carotid atherectomy samples did not stimulate TLR 1, 2, 4 or 6 signalling in a HEK-293 transfection assay. TLR4 signalling does not contribute to OxPAPC induced IL-8 expression in human epithelial HEK-293, monocytic THP-1 or aortic endothelial cells. As lipids extracted from diseased human artery also induced no TLR signalling, it is likely that the TLR-activating materials contributing to atherosclerosis are not of endogenous lipid origin.
Resumo:
Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.
Resumo:
Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.
Resumo:
Bacterial Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a strong inducer of inflammation and does so by inducing polarization of macrophages to the classic inflammatory M1 population. Given the role of Btk as a critical signal transducer downstream of TLR4, we investigated its role in M1/M2 induction. In Btk deficient (Btk (-\-)) mice we observed markedly reduced recruitment of M1 macrophages following intraperitoneal administration of LPS. Ex vivo analysis demonstrated an impaired ability of Btk(-/-) macrophages to polarize into M1 macrophages, instead showing enhanced induction of immunosuppressive M2-associated markers in response to M1 polarizing stimuli, a finding accompanied by reduced phosphorylation of STAT1 and enhanced STAT6 phosphorylation. In addition to STAT activation, M1 and M2 polarizing signals modulate the expression of inflammatory genes via differential activation of transcription factors and regulatory proteins, including NF-κB and SHIP1. In keeping with a critical role for Btk in macrophage polarization, we observed reduced levels of NF-κB p65 and Akt phosphorylation, as well as reduced induction of the M1 associated marker iNOS in Btk(-/-) macrophages in response to M1 polarizing stimuli. Additionally enhanced expression of SHIP1, a key negative regulator of macrophage polarisation, was observed in Btk(-/-) macrophages in response to M2 polarizing stimuli. Employing classic models of allergic M2 inflammation, treatment of Btk (-/-) mice with either Schistosoma mansoni eggs or chitin resulted in increased recruitment of M2 macrophages and induction of M2-associated genes. This demonstrates an enhanced M2 skew in the absence of Btk, thus promoting the development of allergic inflammation.
Resumo:
La reconnaissance d’un antigène présenté par les cellules présentatrices d’antigène induit la prolifération et la différenciation des lymphocytes T naïfs en lymphocytes T effecteurs et mémoires. Cette reconnaissance se fait par l’interaction du récepteur des cellules T (TCR) des lymphocytes T et le complexe CMH-peptide présent à la surface des DC. Cependant, des signaux additionnels sont requis, une meilleure activation des lymphocytes T implique des corécepteurs présents à la surface de ces deux types cellulaires. Après l’élimination de l’antigène, la plupart des lymphocytes T effecteurs vont mourir. Une petite population de lymphocytes T va persister pour se différencier en lymphocytes T mémoires capables de protéger l’organisme contre une réinfection. Les signaux qui contrôlent le maintien des lymphocytes T mémoires sont encore mal compris. Pour comprendre le rôle de la molécule de costimulation 4-1BB dans le maintien des lymphocytes T CD8 mémoires, nous avons émis l’hypothèse que l’état de phosphorylation de la protéine adaptatrice TRAF1, qui se lie à 4-1BB, module le maintien des lymphocytes T CD8 mémoires. Ainsi, nous avons montré par des expériences de spectrométrie de masse que TRAF1 s’associe préférentiellement à TBK1 lorsqu’elle n’est pas phosphorylée. Nous avons aussi montré que la présence de TRAF1 est requise pour stabiliser TBK1 au récepteur 4-1BB après stimulation des lymphocytes T. Par ailleurs, les lymphocytes T CD8 OT-I TRAF1-/- reconstituées avec un mutant phospho-déficient de TRAF1 (S139A) et ensuite différenciées en lymphocytes T mémoires in vitro induisent une activation de la voie de signalisation NF-ĸB contrairement à ceux exprimant la forme phospho-mimétique de TRAF1 (S139D). Ces premières études démontrent l’importance de l’état de phosphorylation de TRAF1 en aval de 4-1BB dans les cellules T. Dans la seconde partie, nous avons évalué le rôle d’un autre corécepteur; la neuropiline 1, dans la maturation des DC. A cet effet, nous avons émis l’hypothèse que l’interaction de la neuropiline 1 et ses ligands contribuerait à la fonction des DC. Nous avons démontré que l’absence de la neuropiline 1 n’a pas d’effet sur la maturation au LPS des DC. Cependant, la présence du VEGF (un ligand de Nrp-1) inhibe la maturation des DC dérivées de la moelle osseuse. Notre étude a démontré que VEGF inhibe l’expression des molécules de costimulation, la sécrétion des cytokines pro inflammatoires et la signalisation TLR4 principalement les voies MAP Kinase et NF-ĸB. Contrairement aux résultats avec les cellules WT, VEGF n’est pas capable d’affecter la maturation, la sécrétion des cytokines et la signalisation TLR4 des DC Nrp1-Lyz où la neuropiline 1 est délétée. Ainsi, nos résultats ont démontré que VEGF inhibe la maturation des DC de façon Nrp1-dépendante. Enfin, l’analyse des molécules partenaires de la neuropiline 1 montre que Nrp1, VEGF et TLR4 se retrouvent dans le même complexe. Nos résultats démontrent que VEGF, en présence de la neuropiline 1 est capable d’interagir avec TLR4 pour inhiber la maturation des DC. Toutefois, en absence de la neuropiline1, VEGF n’est pas capable de recruter TLR4 pour réduire l’expression des molécules de costimulation. Ces études sur les corécepteurs pourraient être importantes dans l’élaboration de nouvelles approches vaccinales.
Resumo:
NlmCategory="UNASSIGNED">We previously reported that TLR4(-/-) mice are refractory to mouse-adapted A/PR/8/34 (PR8) influenza-induced lethality and that therapeutic administration of the TLR4 antagonist Eritoran blocked PR8-induced lethality and acute lung injury (ALI) when given starting 2 days post infection. Herein we extend these findings: anti-TLR4- or -TLR2-specific IgG therapy also conferred significant protection of wild-type (WT) mice from lethal PR8 infection. If treatment is initiated 3 h before PR8 infection and continued daily for 4 days, Eritoran failed to protect WT and TLR4(-/-) mice, implying that Eritoran must block a virus-induced, non-TLR4 signal that is required for protection. Mechanistically, we determined that (i) Eritoran blocks high-mobility group B1 (HMGB1)-mediated, TLR4-dependent signaling in vitro and circulating HMGB1 in vivo, and an HMGB1 inhibitor protects against PR8; (ii) Eritoran inhibits pulmonary lung edema associated with ALI; (iii) interleukin (IL)-1β contributes significantly to PR8-induced lethality, as evidenced by partial protection by IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) therapy. Synergistic protection against PR8-induced lethality was achieved when Eritoran and the antiviral drug oseltamivir were administered starting 4 days post infection. Eritoran treatment does not prevent development of an adaptive immune response to subsequent PR8 challenge. Overall, our data support the potential of a host-targeted therapeutic approach to influenza infection.Mucosal Immunology advance online publication 27 January 2016; doi:10.1038/mi.2015.141.
Resumo:
La reconnaissance d’un antigène présenté par les cellules présentatrices d’antigène induit la prolifération et la différenciation des lymphocytes T naïfs en lymphocytes T effecteurs et mémoires. Cette reconnaissance se fait par l’interaction du récepteur des cellules T (TCR) des lymphocytes T et le complexe CMH-peptide présent à la surface des DC. Cependant, des signaux additionnels sont requis, une meilleure activation des lymphocytes T implique des corécepteurs présents à la surface de ces deux types cellulaires. Après l’élimination de l’antigène, la plupart des lymphocytes T effecteurs vont mourir. Une petite population de lymphocytes T va persister pour se différencier en lymphocytes T mémoires capables de protéger l’organisme contre une réinfection. Les signaux qui contrôlent le maintien des lymphocytes T mémoires sont encore mal compris. Pour comprendre le rôle de la molécule de costimulation 4-1BB dans le maintien des lymphocytes T CD8 mémoires, nous avons émis l’hypothèse que l’état de phosphorylation de la protéine adaptatrice TRAF1, qui se lie à 4-1BB, module le maintien des lymphocytes T CD8 mémoires. Ainsi, nous avons montré par des expériences de spectrométrie de masse que TRAF1 s’associe préférentiellement à TBK1 lorsqu’elle n’est pas phosphorylée. Nous avons aussi montré que la présence de TRAF1 est requise pour stabiliser TBK1 au récepteur 4-1BB après stimulation des lymphocytes T. Par ailleurs, les lymphocytes T CD8 OT-I TRAF1-/- reconstituées avec un mutant phospho-déficient de TRAF1 (S139A) et ensuite différenciées en lymphocytes T mémoires in vitro induisent une activation de la voie de signalisation NF-ĸB contrairement à ceux exprimant la forme phospho-mimétique de TRAF1 (S139D). Ces premières études démontrent l’importance de l’état de phosphorylation de TRAF1 en aval de 4-1BB dans les cellules T. Dans la seconde partie, nous avons évalué le rôle d’un autre corécepteur; la neuropiline 1, dans la maturation des DC. A cet effet, nous avons émis l’hypothèse que l’interaction de la neuropiline 1 et ses ligands contribuerait à la fonction des DC. Nous avons démontré que l’absence de la neuropiline 1 n’a pas d’effet sur la maturation au LPS des DC. Cependant, la présence du VEGF (un ligand de Nrp-1) inhibe la maturation des DC dérivées de la moelle osseuse. Notre étude a démontré que VEGF inhibe l’expression des molécules de costimulation, la sécrétion des cytokines pro inflammatoires et la signalisation TLR4 principalement les voies MAP Kinase et NF-ĸB. Contrairement aux résultats avec les cellules WT, VEGF n’est pas capable d’affecter la maturation, la sécrétion des cytokines et la signalisation TLR4 des DC Nrp1-Lyz où la neuropiline 1 est délétée. Ainsi, nos résultats ont démontré que VEGF inhibe la maturation des DC de façon Nrp1-dépendante. Enfin, l’analyse des molécules partenaires de la neuropiline 1 montre que Nrp1, VEGF et TLR4 se retrouvent dans le même complexe. Nos résultats démontrent que VEGF, en présence de la neuropiline 1 est capable d’interagir avec TLR4 pour inhiber la maturation des DC. Toutefois, en absence de la neuropiline1, VEGF n’est pas capable de recruter TLR4 pour réduire l’expression des molécules de costimulation. Ces études sur les corécepteurs pourraient être importantes dans l’élaboration de nouvelles approches vaccinales.
Resumo:
Purpose: To investigate the activity and mechanism of action of arbidol against Hantaan virus (HTNV) activity by modulating inflammation via TLR-4 pathway. Methods: HUVEC cells infected with HTNV 76-118 were treated with serially diluted arbidol solutions at -2h (2 h before viral infection, pre-treatment mode), 0 h (at the same time as viral infection, simultaneous treatment mode) or 2 h (2 h after viral infection, post-treatment mode). The transcript levels of TLR4 were detected by semi-quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) at 6, 12, 18, and 24 h later. The levels of iNOS and TNF-α were examined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: Pre-treatment with arbidol, rather than simultaneous treatment or post-treatment, effectively inhibited up-regulation of cellular TLR4 expression (up to 40 ± 6.1 % inhibition) and activity of supernatant iNOS induced by HTNV infection(up to 44.1 ± 9.4 % inhibition), as well as in a LPSstimulated inflammatory endothelial cell. Arbidol decreased the elevated TNF-α levels induced by LPS stimulation. Conclusion: These results are the first evidence that arbidol modulates viral PRRs signaling and its consequential inflammatory cytokine/chemokine response during hantavirus infection.
Resumo:
Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia Celular, Pós-Graduação em Biologia Molecular, 2016.