Achieving effective supervision

Super vision probably does have benefits both for the maintenance and improvement of clinical skills and for job satisfaction, but the data are very thin and almost non-existent in the area of alcohol and other drugs services. Because of the potential complexity of objectives and roles in super vision, a structured agreement appears to be an important part of the effective supervision relationship. Because sessions can degenerate easily into unstructured socialization, agendas and session objectives may also be important. While a working alliance based on mutual respect and trust is an essential base for the supervision relationship, procedures for direct observation of clinical skills, demonstration of new procedures and skills practice with detailed feedback appear critical to super vision's impact on practice. To ensure effective super vision, there needs not only to be a minimum of personnel and resources, but also a compatibility with the values and procedures of management and staff, access to supervision training and consultation and sufficient incentives to ensure it continues.

A Pilot Randomized Trial Comparing CD-34Selected Versus Unmanipulated Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Severe, Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis

Objective. Evidence from animal studies, case reports, and phase I studies suggests that hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can be effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It is unclear, however, if depletion of T cells in the stem cell product infused after high-dose chemotherapy is beneficial in prolonging responses by reducing the number of infused autoreactive T cells. This pilot multicenter, randomized trial was undertaken to obtain feasibility data on whether CD34 selection (as a form of T cell depletion) of an autologous stem cell graft is of benefit in the HSCT procedure in patients with severe, refractory RA. Methods. Thirty-three patients with severe RA who had been treated unsuccessfully with methotrexate and at least 1 other disease-modifying agent were enrolled in the trial. The patients received high-dose immunosuppressive treatment with 200 mg/kg cyclophosphamide followed by an infusion of autologous stem cells that were CD34 selected or unmanipulated. Safety, efficacy (based on American College of Rheumatology [ACR] response criteria), and time to recurrence of disease were assessed on a monthly basis for up to 12 months. Results. All patients were living at the end of the study, with no major unexpected toxicities. Overall, on an intent-to-treat basis, ACR 20% response (ACR20) was achieved in 70% of the patients. An ACR70 response was attained in 27.7% of the 18 patients who had received CD34-selected cells and 53.3% of the 15 who had received unmanipulated cells (P = 0.20). The median time to disease recurrence was 147 days in the CD34-selected cell group and 201 days in the unmanipulated cell group (P = 0.28). There was no relationship between CD4 lymphopenia and response, but 72% of rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive patients had an increase in RF titer prior to recurrence of disease. Conclusion. HSCT can be performed safely in patients with RA, and initial results indicate significant responses in patients with severe, treatment-resistant disease. Similar outcomes were observed in patients undergoing HSCT with unmanipulated cells and those receiving CD34-selected cells. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Discovering the Law Again: John Grisham, Ed Stevens and the Postmaterial Lawyer

This paper uses three films adapted from the novels of John Grisham, The Firm, The Rainmaker and A Time To Kill, as well as associated television series like Ed to map a vernacular theory of what I have termed the 'postmaterial' lawyer. Grisham's work has been the focus of much critique by legal scholars who suggests he hates lawyers, is critical of the concept of law, and provides 'outlandishly' happy endings. I will challenge these critiques and, in tracing the history of legal thrillers and trial movies, suggest that Grisham and the related texts' explorations of how a just practitioner can operate in an unjust system constitute a powerful interrogation of what law can be.

A regra de Taylor e a política monetário brasileira : relações de longo e curto prazo

Tem sido publicado e discutido cada vez mais o papel dos Bancos Centrais no sentido de minimizarem os custos da inflação para o conjunto da sociedade. O objetivo deste trabalho é investigar se o Banco Central do Brasil implementou no período Janeiro de 2005 a Julho de 2012 uma regra de política monetária consistente com a estabilidade de preços, a partir de uma literatura iniciada com o trabalho seminal de Taylor (1993). No primeiro Capítulo, será exposto o conceito de Regras de Política Monetária, iniciando pela Regra de Taylor original e chegando às suas versões atuais. No segundo, que será dividido em dois tópicos, será exibida a literatura empírica sobre o assunto: no primeiro tópico, serão apresentadas as evidências empíricas existentes para as experiências internacionais e, no segundo tópico, para a experiência brasileira. No terceiro Capítulo, por sua vez, será feita uma aplicação econométrica sobre a experiência brasileira recente, por meio de estimações de regressões de Mínimos Quadrados Ordinários (MQO) para a análise de curto prazo e de Cointegração na análise de longo prazo, através da abordagem de Johansen (1991). Além disto, os resultados encontrados serão interpretados à luz da teoria e comparados com as evidências existentes e apresentadas no Capítulo anterior. Grosso modo, os resultados empíricos apontam para o fato de que embora no curto prazo a Regra de Taylor expandida possa ser usada para interpretar as relações entre taxa Selic e inflação observada, no longo prazo há relações estruturais que só podem ser explicadas por elementos teóricos adicionais, tais como os presentes na Curva de Phillips, Curva IS e na abordagem da Paridade Descoberta da Taxa de Juros. Ademais, o trabalho encontra um grau de inércia da taxa Selic, no curto prazo, superior ao observado em trabalhos anteriores, sugerindo uma elevação do conservadorismo do BCB nos últimos anos.

John Rawls e a educação : contribuições para análise do direito à educação da Constituição Federal de 1988 e da Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional

Esta dissertação tem como objetivo abordar a relação entre justiça e educação, mais especificadamente, entre a teoria da justiça como equidade que foi desenvolvida por John Rawls, na obra Uma Teoria da Justiça, e a Constituição Federal de 1988 e a Lei de Diretrizes e Bases da Educação Nacional – LDBEN que regem o direito à educação no Brasil. O trabalho foi desenvolvido por meio de pesquisa bibliográfica e documental, em que analisamos as duas principais legislações que dirigem a educação nacional e os escritos da teoria rawlsiana. Com este processo analítico percebemos que a teoria da justiça de Rawls foi fundamentada pela teoria do contrato social e, buscava estabelecer-se como alternativa à doutrina utilitarista. E, por ser uma teoria de grande amplitude, que buscava intervir nas sociedades democráticas, foi possível encontrar ideais educacionais nos escritos de John Rawls. Além disso, conseguimos estabelecer a relação entre os estágios de aplicação dos princípios da justiça e a importância das leis para os Estados democráticos. Por fim, percebemos que há relação direta entre diversas partes das duas legislações estudadas e os ideais de John Rawls, o que demonstra a influência que o liberalismo político anglo-saxão exerce sobre nossas normativas educacionais.

Princípios de Economia Política John Stuart Mill

Revista Lusófona de Ciência Política e Relações Internacionais

John Conway e o seu Jogo da Vida

Apresenta-se uma biografia sucinta de John Horton Conway, matemático nascido em 1937 em Liverpool. Conway tornou-se bem conhecido após a sua invenção do Jogo da Vida, o qual é um exemplo de auto-organização e interessante para biólogos, matemáticos, economistas, filósofos e público em geral.

The 27th British liquid crystal society annual meeting 2013, Cambridge

Attending the British Liquid Crystal Society’s (BLCS) Annual Meeting was a formative experience in my days as a PhD student, starting way back in the 1990s. At that time, this involved travelling to (to me) exotic parts of the United Kingdom, such as Reading, Oxford or Manchester, away from Southampton where I was based. Some postdoctoral years in a different country followed, and three BLCS Meetings were missed, until in 1997 and 1998, I was able to attend again, in Southampton and Leeds, respectively. Not much had changed from my student days, the size and the format were still about the same, many of the leading characters were still around, and the closing talk would still be given by John Lydon. Well, at some point, I got myself a proper academic job on the Continent and stopped attending BLCS Annual Meetings altogether. The fond memories of my youth started to fade. Were the Meetings still on? It seemed so, as old friends and acquaintances would occasionally recount attending them, and even winning prizes at them. But, it all seemed rather remote now. Until, that is, it came to pass that the 27th BLCS Meeting would be held in Selwyn College, Cambridge, just down (or up, depending on how you look at it) the road from the Isaac Newton Institute, where I was spending part of my sabbatical leave. The opportunity to resume attendance could not be missed. A brief e-mail exchange with the organisers, and a cheque to cover the fee, duly secured this. And thus, it was with trepidation that I approached my first BLCS Annual Meeting in more than a decade.