Iowa Utilities Board Fiscal Year 2003 Regulatory Plan Prepared Pursuant to Executive Order Nine, August 26, 2002

Regulatory Plan for Fiscal Year 2003

Iowa Board of Parole Annual Report, 2003

Annual report produced by Iowa Board of Parole

Iowa Board of Parole Annual Report, 1999

Annual report produced by Iowa Board of Parole

Iowa Board of Parole Annual Report, 2000

Annual report produced by Iowa Board of Parole

Iowa Board of Parole Annual Report, 2001

Annual report produced by Iowa Board of Parole

Iowa Board of Parole Annual Report, 2002

Annual report produced by Iowa Board of Parole

Maxine Faye Boomgarden and Iowa Civil Rights Commission vs. Hardin County Veterans' Commission Board and Hardin County Board of Supervisors, 1991

Case report from the Civil Rights Commission. Maxine Faye Boomgarden and Iowa Civil Rights Commission vs. Hardin County Veterans' Commission Board and Hardin County Board of Supervisors.

Iowa Soybean Promotion Board, Independent Auditor's Reports, Financial Statements and Supplemental Information, Schedule of Findings, August 31, 2003 & 2004

State Agency Audit Report

Iowa Corn Promotion Board, Independent Auditor's Reports Financial Statements and Supplemental Information, August 31, 2003 & 2004

State Agency Audit Report

2003 Annual Report of the Iowa Utilities Board

Annual report for the Iowa Utilities Board

Department of Commerce - Iowa Utilities Board, Performance Report, Performance Results Achieved for Fiscal Year 2004, December 2004

The FY04 Performance Report for the Iowa Utilities Board (IUB) highlights the services the IUB provided to Iowans, along with results achieved to ensure utility service reliability and to improve and expand utility service infrastructure in Iowa. This information is provided in accordance with the State of Iowa Accountable Government Act, Iowa Code chapter 8E. The two basic business functions of the IUB are utility regulation and compliance, and resource management. This report covers performance information for both of these areas.

South Central Regional E-911 Service Board, Independent Auditor's Reports, Finacial Statements and Supplementary Information, Schedule of Findings, June 30, 2004

Other Audit Reports - 28E Organizations

Iowa Sheep and Wool Promotion Board, Independent Auditor's Reports, Financial Statements, Schedule of Findings, June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2004

State Agency Audit Report

Anti-Nogo-A Antibody Treatment Promotes Recovery of Manual Dexterity after Unilateral Cervical Lesion in Adult Primates--re-examination and Extension of Behavioral Data.

In rodents and nonhuman primates subjected to spinal cord lesion, neutralizing the neurite growth inhibitor Nogo-A has been shown to promote regenerative axonal sprouting and functional recovery. The goal of the present report was to re-examine the data on the recovery of the primate manual dexterity using refined behavioral analyses and further statistical assessments, representing secondary outcome measures from the same manual dexterity test. Thirteen adult monkeys were studied; seven received an anti-Nogo-A antibody whereas a control antibody was infused into the other monkeys. Monkeys were trained to perform the modified Brinkman board task requiring opposition of index finger and thumb to grasp food pellets placed in vertically and horizontally oriented slots. Two parameters were quantified before and following spinal cord injury: (i) the standard 'score' as defined by the number of pellets retrieved within 30 s from the two types of slots; (ii) the newly introduced 'contact time' as defined by the duration of digit contact with the food pellet before successful retrieval. After lesion the hand was severely impaired in all monkeys; this was followed by progressive functional recovery. Remarkably, anti-Nogo-A antibody-treated monkeys recovered faster and significantly better than control antibody-treated monkeys, considering both the score for vertical and horizontal slots (Mann-Whitney test: P = 0.05 and 0.035, respectively) and the contact time (P = 0.008 and 0.005, respectively). Detailed analysis of the lesions excluded the possibility that this conclusion may have been caused by differences in lesion properties between the two groups of monkeys.