Processo de seleção de sistemas integrados: possibilidades de modelagem com base na análise de decisões

Trata do problema da seleção de Sistemas Integrados, ou ERP (Enterprise Resource Systems), investigando o processo especificamente sob o ponto de vista da Análise de Decisões. Procura analisar a associação entre a satisfação tanto com o Sistema Integrado selecionado quanto com a forma em que foi estruturado o próprio processo de seleção, com variáveis especificamente selecionadas para tal, representativas, entre outros, de grupos de critérios de decisão e características específicas do processo de seleção, relacionadas, estas últimas, a questões como o tratamento dado ao fator risco e ao possível caráter coletivo da decisão. Questiona a possibilidade de modelagem do processo de seleção de Sistemas Integrados, a partir da proposta normativa oferecida pela Teoria da Utilidade, e da suposta existência de um gap ou distância entre esta proposta e a prática naquele processo de seleção. Propõe um modelo mental genérico que procura explicar o modo como os agentes decisórios abordam o problema de seleção de sistemas integrados. Apresenta e propõe um modelo dinâmico que justificaria a existência do gap acima mencionado a partir da incapacidade do modelo mental genérico em apreender toda a complexidade inerente ao problema de seleção de sistemas integrados.

O valor da tecnologia da informação: considerações sobre a avaliação de investimentos estratégicos em TI e sobre o processo de análise e tomada de decisão

Este trabalho discute os principais fatores a serem considerados na tomada de decisões estratégicas relativas a investimentos em tecnologia da informação. É feita uma avaliação do impacto da implantação de TI nas organizações e são sugeridos métodos que podem ser utilizados para medir os benefícios tangíveis e intangíveis do investimento em TI. A seguir, é feita uma apresentação breve da teoria de análise de decisões e da forma como algumas das novas ferramentas de software podem auxiliar os seres humanos a tomar decisões racionais. Por fim, é apresentado um exemplo de um modelo multi-critérios simples (SMARTS) como uma ferramenta de apoio ao processo de decisão.

Modelo de decisão multicritério para seleções interciclo das universidades novas: estudo na Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

The discussions wherein develop proposals for university reform in Brazil include, among other things, the conception of the university titled "New University", whose structural origin comes from the bill of higher education reform and unification of the foundations of education European upper (Bologna process). At its core, the Bologna process has imposed a series of transformations, among which, the promotion of mobility, as a stimulus to interinstitutional cooperation to enable an better and bigger qualification of the students. Nevertheless, what we see is that this point is one of the main points made flawed by Brazilian institutions that have adopted this model of higher education. An example is the Bachelor of Science and Technology - BC&T, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN, where there are problems of the internal order, represented by the problem of the reusing of the disciplines, such also of external order, in cases of transfers interinstitutional. Because of this, and knowing that this is a typical problem in which multiple criteria are involved, the aim of this study is to propose a multicriteria model for selection of interciclo of the BC&T of the UFRN which addresses the issue of mobility. For this, this study was of exploratory and study case nature, use as tools of data collection, the bibliographic and documentary research, as well as semi-structured interviews. For the elaboration of the model, were used the five phases most commonly used in the modeling of problems in operational research in a sample of 91 students of BC&T. As a result, we obtained a model that addresses the issue of internal and external mobility of the school and that, moreover, was also more robust and fair than the current model of BC&T and also what is used in other courses of the UFRN, taking into consideration the expected results by the decision makers

Modelagem da decisão por pacotes de viagem: um estudo usando processo de hierarquia analítica AHP

The objective of this dissertation is to propose a Multi Criteria Decision Aid Model to be used by the costumers of the travel agencies and help them to choose the best package travel. The main objective is to contribute for the simplification of the travel package decision choice from the identification of the models of values and preference of the customers and applying them to the existing package. It is used the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to structuralize a decision hierarchic model composed by six criteria (package cost, hotel category, security of the city, travel time, direct flight and position in ranking of the 10 most visited destination) and five real alternatives of packages for a holiday of three days created from travel agency data. The decision analysis was realized for the choice of a travel package by a group composed by two couples that regularly travels together, to which was asked to do a pairwise judgment of the criteria and the alternatives. The mains results show that, although been a group that travels together, there are different models of values in the weights of the criteria and a certain convergence in the scales of preferences of the alternatives in the criteria. It was not pointed a dominant alternative for all the members of the group separately, but an analysis of a total utility of the group shows a classification and an order of the travel packages and an alternative clearly in front of the others. The sensitivity analysis revels that there are changes in the ranking, but the two alternatives best classified in the normal analysis are the same ones in the sensitivity analysis, although with the positions changed. The analysis also led to a simplification of the process with the exclusion of alternatives dominated for the others ones. As main conclusion, it is evaluated that the model and method suggested allow a simplification of the decision process in the choice of travel packages

MoSAC: um módulo para seleção de configurações arquiteturais baseado em critérios de QoS no contexto de sistema distribuídos autoadaptativos

The process for choosing the best components to build systems has become increasingly complex. It becomes more critical if it was need to consider many combinations of components in the context of an architectural configuration. These circumstances occur, mainly, when we have to deal with systems involving critical requirements, such as the timing constraints in distributed multimedia systems, the network bandwidth in mobile applications or even the reliability in real-time systems. This work proposes a process of dynamic selection of architectural configurations based on non-functional requirements criteria of the system, which can be used during a dynamic adaptation. This proposal uses the MAUT theory (Multi-Attribute Utility Theory) for decision making from a finite set of possibilities, which involve multiple criteria to be analyzed. Additionally, it was proposed a metamodel which can be used to describe the application s requirements in terms of the non-functional requirements criteria and their expected values, to express them in order to make the selection of the desired configuration. As a proof of concept, it was implemented a module that performs the dynamic choice of configurations, the MoSAC. This module was implemented using a component-based development approach (CBD), performing a selection of architectural configurations based on the proposed selection process involving multiple criteria. This work also presents a case study where an application was developed in the context of Digital TV to evaluate the time spent on the module to return a valid configuration to be used in a middleware with autoadaptative features, the middleware AdaptTV

Brazilian network for the surveillance of maternal potentially life threatening morbidity and maternal near-miss and a multidimensional evaluation of their long term consequences

Background. It has been suggested that the study of women who survive life-threatening complications related to pregnancy (maternal near-miss cases) may represent a practical alternative to surveillance of maternal morbidity/mortality since the number of cases is higher and the woman herself is able to provide information on the difficulties she faced and the long-term repercussions of the event. These repercussions, which may include sexual dysfunction, postpartum depression and posttraumatic stress disorder, may persist for prolonged periods of time, affecting women's quality of life and resulting in adverse effects to them and their babies. Objective. The aims of the present study are to create a nationwide network of scientific cooperation to carry out surveillance and estimate the frequency of maternal near-miss cases, to perform a multicenter investigation into the quality of care for women with severe complications of pregnancy, and to carry out a multidimensional evaluation of these women up to six months. Methods/Design. This project has two components: a multicenter, cross-sectional study to be implemented in 27 referral obstetric units in different geographical regions of Brazil, and a concurrent cohort study of multidimensional analysis. Over 12 months, investigators will perform prospective surveillance to identify all maternal complications. The population of the cross-sectional component will consist of all women surviving potentially life-threatening conditions (severe maternal complications) or life-threatening conditions (the maternal near miss criteria) and maternal deaths according to the new WHO definition and criteria. Data analysis will be performed in case subgroups according to the moment of occurrence and determining cause. Frequencies of near-miss and other severe maternal morbidity and the association between organ dysfunction and maternal death will be estimated. A proportion of cases identified in the cross-sectional study will comprise the cohort of women for the multidimensional analysis. Various aspects of the lives of women surviving severe maternal complications will be evaluated 3 and 6 months after the event and compared to a group of women who suffered no severe complications in pregnancy. Previously validated questionnaires will be used in the interviews to assess reproductive function, posttraumatic stress, functional capacity, quality of life, sexual function, postpartum depression and infant development. © 2009 Cecatti et al.

Selecting the most adequate bedding material for broiler production in Brazil

Broiler chicken production is widely dispersed across the globe, and one important issue for growers is the selection of adequate bedding material, as the availability and price of substrates varies among countries and regions within a same country. This study aimed at applying a multiple criteria analysis approach for the selection of the most appropriate bedding material for broiler production. Based on field research data and growers' experience, the most desirable characteristics of a litter material were chosen as the main criteria. The selected materials were wood shavings, rice husks, chopped Napier grass (Pennisetum pupureum), 50% sugar cane bagasse (Saccharum L.) plus 50% wood shavings, 50% sugar cane bagasse (Saccharum L.) plus 50% rice husks, and pure sugar cane bagasse (Saccharum L.). The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) was applied for selecting the most suitable bedding material. Validation was performed using data from previous studies carried out in central-western Brazil on the effects of different types of bedding material on broiler carcass quality. Considering the selected criteria, several bedding materials were tested and ranked, and the results showed that wood-shavings litter was the best option (weight = 0.28), followed by rice husks (weight = 0.24). All other tested alternatives presented lower scores and were, therefore, not considered for use. The AHP approach was found to be an efficient tool to select the most appropriate litter material under specific scenarios.

Aplicação do Processo Analítico Hierarquico (AHP) Para Priorização de Obras de Intervenção em Áreas e Setores de Risco Geológico nos Municípios de Itapecerica da Serra e Suzano (SP)

Municipal Plans of Risk Reducing (PMRR's) were produced in settlements in the municipalities of Itapecerica da Serra (SP) and Suzano (SP), covering areas at risk of landslides and washouts of banks of streams. The development of PMRR's provided the delimitation of areas of risk, the indication of intervention works in order to eliminate and / or reduce risks, and consequently an indication of the areas and priority sectors for implementation of intervention works. The prioritization of areas and sectors that should receive the works of reducing or eliminating risk was performed by an expert involved in risk mapping. Despite the specialist's judgment exercise caution, the decision regarding the priority sites for implementation of alternative interventions is subjective. Since there is no way to eliminate this subjectivity, the use of decision-making techniques is important to evaluate whether the expert's reasoning is consistent. One of the first techniques developed for multiple criteria is the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process). This paper describes the results of a research carried out in order to assess whether the use of Analytic Hierarchy Process contributes to the results of the indication of the areas and priority sectors for implementation of interventions can be considered more consistent than in situations where the priority occurs without the use of decision making techniques. Results were compared between the prioritization of interventions for implementation contained in PMRR's of Itapecerica da Serra and Suzano and those obtained from the use of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). It was concluded that such techniques permits an evaluation of the expert's judgment is logically coherent, thus contributing to produce results more technically based.

Proposta de modelo conceitual de QFD integrado com AHP, modelo de Kano e análise SWOT no desenvolvimento de produto

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Planejamento da recomposição florestal pela análise multicriterial na sub-bacia do córrego do descalvado visando a conservação de recursos hídricos

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Método AHP como instrumento de apoio à decisão para a manutenção da qualidade da água do reservatório de Ilha Solteira

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Gestão do estoque excedente com proposta de redução através de múltiplas alternativas utilizando multiplos criterios

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Aplicação do processo hierárquico analítico (AHP) na priorização de áreas de risco geológico para a implantação de intervenções em assentamentos urbanos precários

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)

Da prescrição radiográfica: uma análise em medicina bucal

A redução da dose de radiação ao paciente é aceita em Radiologia Odontológica, com a finalidade de diminuir os riscos associados ao exame radiográfico. Para atingir este objetivo, além do avanço tecnológico ocorrido nas últimas décadas, devemos considerar a importância do Critério de Seleção para o paciente e da prescrição radiográfica na indicação correta do tipo de radiografia necessária para cada um deles. O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a prescrição radiográfica de pacientes atendidos pelo Serviço de Medicina Bucal da Faculdade de Odontologia de Araraquara - UNESP durante o período de 1989 a 1993. Selecionamos 396 prontuários que constituiu a totalidade dos que continham exames radiográficos. Para a análise da prescrição radiográfica, consideramos as informações obtidas da ficha clínica e da interpretação das radiografias, utilizando os Critérios de Seleção e a análise de decisão clínica. Os resultados demonstraram um alto índice de pacientes com prescrição incorreta (44,0%); tendo em 24,7% dos pacientes ocorrido mais de uma radiografia prescrita incorretamente. Com relação ao tipo de técnica com prescrição incorreta, em 31,6% dos pacientes foi realizada a radiografia panorâmica, vindo a seguir a oclusal (28,7%), outro (17,2%) e a associação da panorâmica e oclusal (12,6%). Pacientes portadores de doenças e alterações de tecido mole tiveram a mais alta freqüência de prescrições incorretas, seguidos pelos portadores de doenças das glândulas salivares (13,5%) (incluindo os tumores); outros (10,1%); distúrbios da A.T.M. (9,0%); inflamação e infecção dos maxilares (6,8%); tumores benignos (5,6%) e tumores malignos (5,6%). Em 62,9% dos pacientes, o exame radiográfico contribuiu para o diagnóstico e tratamento. A alta porcentagem de prescrição incorreta encontrada evidencia a necessidade de... (Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo).

Risco de Farmingham e evento cardiovascular em mulheres com síndrome dos ovários policísticos

Pós-graduação em Ginecologia, Obstetrícia e Mastologia - FMB