Séance Publique de l'Académie des Sciences, Arts et Belles-Lettres de Dijon.

1821

Séance Publique de l'Académie des Sciences, Arts et Belles-Lettres de Dijon.

1823

Séance Publique de l'Académie des Sciences, Arts et Belles-Lettres de Dijon.

1825

Séance Publique de l'Académie des Sciences, Arts et Belles-Lettres de Dijon.

1827

Séance Publique de l'Académie des Sciences, Arts et Belles-Lettres de Dijon.

1835-1836

Séance Publique de l'Académie des Sciences, Arts et Belles-Lettres de Dijon.

1854-1855 (Tome 3 - 4, 2nd Series)

Séance Publique de l'Académie des Sciences, Arts et Belles-Lettres de Dijon.

1856-1857 (Tome 5 - 6, 2nd Series)

Le sport, un enjeu de santé publique ?

Les bénéfices pour la santé d'une activité physique régulière sont de mieux en mieux établis et s'appliquent notamment à des pathologies aussi diverses que l'infarctus du myocarde ou certains cancers. Or, deux tiers de la population suisse rapportent une pratique en activité physique inférieure aux recommandations minimales pour la santé. On estime en Suisse que la sédentarité est annuellement responsable de 2,1 millions de cas de maladie, de 2900 décès et de 2,4 milliards de francs de coûts liés aux traitements.

Reversal of opinion: the implications of the work of Acemoglu and Robinson for marxist thought

This paper describes the implications for Marxist thought of the work of Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson. In the first two periods of this they explained how the rise of democracy brought prosperity to Europe  and why the same process had not worked in Latin America because of the possibility of coups. The implication is that mass poverty can better be alleviated by safeguarding democracy rather than moving to socialism. In the last period A and R have formalized doubts about the efficacy of democracy in this role. The implication here is that Marxists should work to find a system of government that is immune to elite dominance. Hugo Chávez is taken as an example.

Development and current use of parenteral nutrition in critical care - an opinion paper.

Critically ill patients depend on artificial nutrition for the maintenance of their metabolic functions and lean body mass, as well as for limiting underfeeding-related complications. Current guidelines recommend enteral nutrition (EN), possibly within the first 48 hours, as the best way to provide the nutrients and prevent infections. EN may be difficult to realize or may be contraindicated in some patients, such as those presenting anatomic intestinal continuity problems or splanchnic ischemia. A series of contradictory trials regarding the best route and timing for feeding have left the medical community with great uncertainty regarding the place of parenteral nutrition (PN) in critically ill patients. Many of the deleterious effects attributed to PN result from inadequate indications, or from overfeeding. The latter is due firstly to the easier delivery of nutrients by PN compared with EN increasing the risk of overfeeding, and secondly to the use of approximate energy targets, generally based on predictive equations: these equations are static and inaccurate in about 70% of patients. Such high uncertainty about requirements compromises attempts at conducting nutrition trials without indirect calorimetry support because the results cannot be trusted; indeed, both underfeeding and overfeeding are equally deleterious. An individualized therapy is required. A pragmatic approach to feeding is proposed: at first to attempt EN whenever and as early as possible, then to use indirect calorimetry if available, and to monitor delivery and response to feeding, and finally to consider the option of combining EN with PN in case of insufficient EN from day 4 onwards.