961 resultados para GI Bill
Resumo:
Max Bill es un artista lógico. Quince variaciones sobre el mismo tema 1938, podría ser el epítome de la lógica de Bill: la obra como resultado de la aplicación de leyes distintas sobre una estructura de orden. La gran diversidad formal de la obra de Max Bill –entre sus diseños de objetos, su tipografía, su pintura, su escultura o su arquitectura no parece haber líneas formales evidentes- se debe a que, para él, cada tarea es diferente y depende de medios y leyes propios. Una diversidad que podría ser erróneamente interpretada como un tipo de eclecticismo. Su conferencia en el Werkbund suizo de 1948 “belleza de la función, belleza como función”, se aleja del discurso funcionalista al proponer la belleza como una igual al resto de funciones. Cada obra ha de satisfacer la finalidad para la que ha sido construida y cumplir todas las funciones que en ella intervienen pero, además, ha de ser bella. La particularidad de Bill estriba en que, reconociéndose a sí mismo como un artista lógico, incluye la belleza como una más de las funciones a cumplir por cualquier objeto. Su famoso aforismo en relación a la configuración del entorno, desde la cuchara a la ciudad, incluiría la arquitectura en el ámbito de los objetos que han de cumplir esta nueva función. La búsqueda de la belleza será una constante en su obra. No una belleza generalizable y determinada a priori, sino una belleza entendida como predicado singular, individualizada para cada tarea. De este modo, podemos analizar, alternativamente, la belleza lógica de sus construcciones geométricas y la belleza simbólica de sus monumentos; la belleza del espacio sin fin en las superficies de una sola cara y la belleza prefabricada en sus más austeras realizaciones; la belleza elemental de sus esculturas y la belleza corriente con que sus arquitecturas se integran en la ciudad. Podemos plantearnos la posibilidad de una belleza de la estructura y entender simultáneamente la belleza cruda de su obra maestra, los edificios de la Escuela de Ulm. La búsqueda de la belleza nos ayudará a entender que, en la obra de Bill, la razón intuitiva -como modo de conocimiento- toma mayor importancia de la que parece. La forma como suma de todas las funciones en unidad armónica, será el resultado de un adecuado equilibrio entre razón lógica y razón intuitiva. ABSTRACT Max Bill is a logical artist. We could consider “Fitfteen variations on the same theme”, 1938, as the Bill’s logic epitome: the work as a result of the application of different tectonic laws on the order structure. The variety of the form in Bill’s work –his designed objects, his typography, his painting, his sculpture, or his architecture do not seem to have, between them, a direct line connecting the form- is due to the fact that, for him, each task is different and it depends on the own means and tectonic laws. A kind of diversity that could be misinterpreted like certain type of eclecticism. His lecture at the Suisse Werkbund (1948) “beauty from function and as function” is far from the functionalist speech, when proposing beauty as an equal to the rest of functions. In his own words, each work has to satisfy the purpose it was built for and fulfill all functions, and furthermore it has to be beautiful. Seeing himself as a logical artist, Bill however introduces beauty as one more of the functions that any object has to fulfill. His famous aphorism related to the environment management, from the spoon to the city, would include architecture as one more of the objects that have to satisfy this new function. The pursuit of beauty is a constant in his work. It won’t be a general beauty determined in advance, but a singular predicate, individualized for each task. That way, we can analyze, alternatively, the logical beauty of his geometric constructions and the symbolical beauty of his monuments; the beauty of the endless space in the single-sided surfaces and the prefabricated beauty in his most stricts constructions; the elemental beauty of his sculptures and the ordinary beauty with which some of his architectures are integrated in the city. We can also try the possibility of a beauty from the structure and understand, at the same time, the raw beauty of his architectural masterpiece, the buildings of the Ulm School of Design. The pursuit of beauty in Bill’s work will help us to understand that intuitive reason, as a way of knowledge, takes more importance than it seems. Form, as the harmonious expression of the sum of all functions, will be the result of an appropriate balance between logical and intuitive reason.
Resumo:
Creo haber leído alguna vez que Bill Gates es la persona más rica del mundo, lo que me indica que hay alguien, que no es el fisco, que dedica su tiempo a contar la riqueza de los ricos. Menos mal que también hay quien, como la Fundación Príncipe de Asturias,hace algo más útil, como es ocuparse de valorar y ensalzar la parte de su riqueza que algunos ricos destinan a resolver los problemas de los pobres del mundo. Así es como ha decidido premiar a la Fundación Bill y Melinda Gates por su labor benéfica en pro de la salud mundial y de la educación, de la erradicación de la hambruna y de reducir desigualdades que afectan a lo que llamamos tercer mundo.
Resumo:
In the last decade, several monomeric and heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide binding proteins have been identified to associate with secretory vesicles and to be implicated in exocytosis. Vesicle volume also has been proposed to play a regulatory role in secretory vesicle fusion at the plasma membrane. However, the molecular mechanism of function of the guanine nucleotide binding proteins and of the regulation of secretory vesicle volume in the exocytotic process remains unclear. In this study, we report association of the secretory vesicle membrane with the α subunit of a heterotrimeric GTP binding protein Gαi3 and implicate its involvement in vesicle swelling. Using an atomic force microscope in combination with confocal microscopy, we were able to study the dynamics of isolated zymogen granules, the secretory vesicles in exocrine pancreas. Exposure of zymogen granules to GTP resulted in a 15–25% increase in vesicle height as measured by the atomic force microscope and a similar increase in vesicle diameter as determined by confocal microscopy. Mas7, an active mastoparan analog known to stimulate Gi proteins, was found to stimulate the GTPase activity of isolated zymogen granules and cause swelling. Increase in vesicle size in the presence of GTP, NaF, and Mas7 were irreversible and KCl-sensitive. Ca2+ had no effect on zymogen granule size. Taken together, the results indicate that Gαi3 protein localized in the secretory vesicle membrane mediates vesicle swelling, a potentially important prerequisite for vesicle fusion at the cell plasma membrane.
Resumo:
Many chemoattractants cause chemotaxis of leukocytes by stimulating a structurally distinct class of G protein-coupled receptors. To identify receptor functions required for chemotaxis, we studied chemotaxis in HEK293 cells transfected with receptors for nonchemokine ligands or for interleukin 8 (IL-8), a classical chemokine. In gradients of the appropriate agonist, three nonchemokine Gi-coupled receptors (the D2 dopamine receptor and opioid μ and δ receptors) mediated chemotaxis; the β2-adrenoreceptor and the M3-muscarinic receptor, which couple respectively to Gs and Gq, did not mediate chemotaxis. A mutation deleting 31 C-terminal amino acids from the IL-8 receptor type B quantitatively impaired chemotaxis and agonist-induced receptor internalization, but not inhibition of adenylyl cyclase or stimulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. To probe the possible relation between receptor internalization and chemotaxis, we used two agonists of the μ-opioid receptor. Morphine and etorphine elicited quantitatively similar chemotaxis, but only etorphine induced receptor internalization. Overexpression of two βγ sequestering proteins (βARK-ct and αt) prevented IL-8 receptor type B-mediated chemotaxis but did not affect inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by IL-8. We conclude that: (i) Nonchemokine Gi-coupled receptors can mediate chemotaxis. (ii) Gi activation is necessary but probably not sufficient for chemotaxis. (iii) Chemotaxis does not require receptor internalization. (iv) Chemotaxis requires the release of free βγ subunits.