Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) improves patient-ventilator interaction during non-invasive ventilation delivered by face mask.

PURPOSE: To determine if, compared to pressure support (PS), neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) reduces patient-ventilator asynchrony in intensive care patients undergoing noninvasive ventilation with an oronasal face mask. METHODS: In this prospective interventional study we compared patient-ventilator synchrony between PS (with ventilator settings determined by the clinician) and NAVA (with the level set so as to obtain the same maximal airway pressure as in PS). Two 20-min recordings of airway pressure, flow and electrical activity of the diaphragm during PS and NAVA were acquired in a randomized order. Trigger delay (T(d)), the patient's neural inspiratory time (T(in)), ventilator pressurization duration (T(iv)), inspiratory time in excess (T(iex)), number of asynchrony events per minute and asynchrony index (AI) were determined. RESULTS: The study included 13 patients, six with COPD, and two with mixed pulmonary disease. T(d) was reduced with NAVA: median 35 ms (IQR 31-53 ms) versus 181 ms (122-208 ms); p = 0.0002. NAVA reduced both premature and delayed cyclings in the majority of patients, but not the median T(iex) value. The total number of asynchrony events tended to be reduced with NAVA: 1.0 events/min (0.5-3.1 events/min) versus 4.4 events/min (0.9-12.1 events/min); p = 0.08. AI was lower with NAVA: 4.9 % (2.5-10.5 %) versus 15.8 % (5.5-49.6 %); p = 0.03. During NAVA, there were no ineffective efforts, or late or premature cyclings. PaO(2) and PaCO(2) were not different between ventilatory modes. CONCLUSION: Compared to PS, NAVA improved patient ventilator synchrony during noninvasive ventilation by reducing T(d) and AI. Moreover, with NAVA, ineffective efforts, and late and premature cyclings were absent.

Interpretation of array comparative genome hybridization data: a major challenge.

The advent and application of high-resolution array-based comparative genome hybridization (array CGH) has led to the detection of large numbers of copy number variants (CNVs) in patients with developmental delay and/or multiple congenital anomalies as well as in healthy individuals. The notion that CNVs are also abundantly present in the normal population challenges the interpretation of the clinical significance of detected CNVs in patients. In this review we will illustrate a general clinical workflow based on our own experience that can be used in routine diagnostics for the interpretation of CNVs.

Puce a ADN: pourquoi et pour qui [Array CGH: why and to whom]

Structural genomic abnormalities play a key role in the pathogenesis of human disorders and represent one of the first causes of mental impairment, complex syndromes and tumors. In order to detect these chromosomal abnormalities, many methodologies have been developed with limits. The new ARRAY based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (ARRAY CGH) is a revolutionary approach which allows to characterize very small genetic abnormalities undetectable by the standard approaches and in the absence of any associated clinical information. The aim of this article is to describe why the application of a new array CGH methodology is necessary in the etiological search for genetic diseases, what the limits of the standard approaches are and to whom arrayCGH analyses can be applied in a pediatric environment. Examples of our practice will be presented.

Origène face au problème du désaccord (diaphonia) entre les évangiles (CIo X, 3-36)

(Résumé de l'ouvrage) Il "Commento a Giovanni" si presenta con caratteri di eccezionalità nell'ambito di una produzione origeniana, da collocare sotto il segno del genio.