Sewers and water mains in England and Wales; materials, manufacture and capital expenditure

DUE TO COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS ONLY AVAILABLE FOR CONSULTATION AT ASTON UNIVERSITY LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SERVICES WITH PRIOR ARRANGEMENT

Disability Discrimination: Obesity and the Court of Justice of the European Union’s decision in Karsten Kaltoft v Billund Kommune Case C-354/13 ECJ

Walker and Karsten are two important decisions in disability discrimination law – not solely on the basis of their legal and practical repercussions for the United Kingdom (UK) and European Union (EU), respectively, but because they capture the very ideological spirit of domestic and European anti-discrimination legislation. The former directly relates to disability discrimination in the UK and the entire EU is feeling the brunt of the Court of Justice of the European Union’s decision in the latter. This article explores the impact of both these decisions and to what extent the obese or those suffering from a functional overlay are now protected from being discriminated against by the Framework Directive 2000/78 and the United Kingdom’s Equality Act 2010.

The Law reports. Cases determined by the Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice, and by the Chief Judge in Bankruptcy, and by the Court of Appeal on appeal from the Chancery Division and the Chief Judge, and in lunacy.

Edited by G.W. Hemming.

Reports of cases argued and determined in the Court of the vice chancellor of England ... [1815-1822]

"Parts 1 and 2 of vol. 6 were reported by Maddock : part 3 (pp. 287-402), by T. C. Geldart ... It is now usually bound and cited as 6 Maddock."--Soule, Lawyer's ref. manual, 1884.

The Law reports of the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting. Courts of Probate, Divorce, and Admiralty, and on appeal therefrom in the Court of Appeal; ecclesiastical courts, and on appeal therefrom in the Privy Council.

Editor: 1891- A.P. Stone; 1895-1936, Frederick Pollock; 1936-1939, A.F. Topham; 1940, R.E.L. Vaughan Williams; 1941, Ralph Sutton.

Argument of Samuel L. Southard : in the case of Stacy Decow and Joseph Hendrickson, versus Thomas L. Shotwell ; delivered at Trenton before the Court of Appeals of the State of New Jersey, at a special term in the eighth month, 1833 /

On appeal from the Court of Chancery. Dispute concerning a school fund of the Society of Friends, which was claimed by both Orthodox and Hicksite factions.

A catalogue of the inquisitions post mortem for the county of York, for the reigns of James I. and Charles I., in the Courts of Chancery and of Wards and Liveries, the latter presented by John Sykes.

Bound with: A catalogue of the Yorkshire wills at Somerset House ....

A digested index to the Virginia reports, containing all the points argued and determined in the Court of appeals of Virginia, from Washington to [third Leigh] ... inclusive [1790-1832] with a table of the names of the cases reported.

Mode of access: Internet.

Leges marchiarum, or, border-laws : containing several original articles and treaties, made and agreed upon by the commissioners of the respective kings of England and Scotland : for the better preservation of peace and commerce upon the marches of both kingdoms : from the reign of Henry III. to the union of the two crowns in K. James I : with a preface, and an appendix of charters and records, relating to the said treaties /

Signatures : A¹², a⁶, B-M¹².

Whose land was it anyway? The Crichel Down Rules and the sale of public land

The guiding principle of compulsory purchase of interests in land in England and Wales is that of fairness, best stated in the words of Lord Justice Scott in Horn v Sunderland Corporation when he said that the owner has “the right to be put, so far as money can do it, in the same position as if his land had not been taken from him”. In many instances, land acquired by compulsion subsequently becomes surplus to the requirements of the acquiring authority. This may be because the intended development scheme was scrapped, or substantially modified, or that after the passage of time the use of the land for which the purchase took place is no longer required. More controversially it may be that for ‘operational reasons’ the acquiring authority knowingly purchased more land than was required for the scheme. Under these circumstances, the Crichel Down Rules (‘the Rules’) require government departments and other statutory bodies to offer back to the former owners or their successors, any land previously so acquired by, or under the threat of, compulsory purchase.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals reports.

Vols. issued in 2 pts., each having also a distinctive title: Customs cases adjudged ... ; Patent cases adjudged ...

List of Chancery rolls, preserved in the Public record office.

Mode of access: Internet.

Report of cases argued and determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona.

Publisher and place of publication vary.