997 resultados para Cochin, Charles Nicolas, 1688-1754.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Title continued: ... gouverneur du Luxembourg; & plusieurs autres monumens très-utiles pour l'éclaircissement de l'histoire du XIV. & XV. siecle. Avec une table des matieres, & des noms des familles les plus considerables dont il est fait mention dans l'ouvrage.
Resumo:
"Pour servir de suite à l'Histoire & aux mémoires de cette Académie" [des Inscriptions et Belles-lettres, Paris].
Resumo:
"Cet ouvrage existe depuis plus de douze ans. Je l'avais écrit pour M. Jefferson, l'homme des deux mondes que je respecte le plus, et, s'il le jugeait à propos, pour les États-Unis de l'Amérique du nord, où en effet il a été imprimé en 1811"--Avertissement, p. [v].
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
The seat is an externally fixed seat for the public located at the entrance to the Prince Charles Hospital. The form of the seat is designed specifically for two, to celebrate the marriage of Charles and Camilla. The design of bench structure represents the Southern Cross which is predominant in our night sky, distinguishing us in location from Charles and Camilla, the night of their wedding. The design also incorporates references to undulating forms of the Queensland Landscape.
Resumo:
In this paper I examine the recent arguments by Charles Foster, Jonathan Herring, Karen Melham and Tony Hope against the utility of the doctrine of double effect. One basis on which they reject the utility of the doctrine is their claim that it is notoriously difficult to apply what they identify as its 'core' component, namely, the distinction between intention and foresight. It is this contention that is the primarily focus of my article. I argue against this claim that the intention/foresight distinction remains a fundamental part of the law in those jurisdictions where intention remains an element of the offence of murder and that, accordingly, it is essential ro resolve the putative difficulties of applying the intention/foresight distinction so as to ensure the integrity of the law of murder. I argue that the main reasons advanced for the claim that the intention/foresight distinction is difficult to apply are ultimately unsustainable, and that the distinction is not as difficult to apply as the authors suggest.