Report of the Commission for the Uniformity of Legislation in the United States to the ..., Governor and ... General Assembly of State of Illinois.

Description based on: May 15, 1984; title from cover.

Report of the Election Laws Commission : submitted to Governor ... and members of the ... General Assembly.

Description based on: 1969.

Report of the Subcommittee on Penal Institutions of the Legislative Commission to Visit and Examine State Institutions.

Title varies.

Biennial report of the Illinois Library Extension Commission.

Mode of access: Internet.

Report.

Report year for 1894/95-1900/01 ends Aug. 15; for 1901/02-1917/18, June 30.

Report of the Law Revision Commission.

Report for 1954 includes Record of hearings on the Uniform commercial code; 1955, Study of the Uniform commercial code; 1956, Report relating to the Uniform commercial code.

A report on vaccination and its results : based on the evidence taken by the Royal Commission during the years 1889-1897.

No record of other volumes published by the society.

Biennial report of the State Tax Commission of Maryland.

Mode of access: Internet.

Railway transport.

Mode of access: Internet.

Annual report of the president and directors of the Northern Central Railway Company to the stockholders.

Mode of access: Internet.

Annual report of the Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul Railway Company.

Description based on: 13th (1876).

Annual report of the Chicago & Alton Railway Company ...

Report year ends June 30.

Report of the State Tax Commission and State Board of Assessors.

Mode of access: Internet.

Annual Report

36th report covers the period July-Dec.1917

Prosecutorial discretion in assisted dying in Canada : a proposal for charging guidelines

An Expert Panel of the Royal Society of Canada and a Select Committee of the Québec National Assembly both recently recommended the issuance of permissive guidelines for the exercise of prosecutorial discretion on voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide and “medical aid in dying��� respectively. It seems timely, therefore, to propose a set of offence-specific guidelines for how prosecutorial discretion should be exercised in cases of voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide in Canadian provinces and territories. We take as our starting point the only existing guidelines of this sort currently in force in the world (i.e. the British Columbia Guidelines, and the England and Wales Guidelines). In light of certain concerns we have with these guidelines, we outline an approach to constructing guidelines for Canadian jurisdictions that begins with identifying three guiding principles we argue are appropriate for this purpose (respect for autonomy, the need for high-quality prosecutorial decision making, and the importance of public confidence in that decision making), and ends with a concrete and detailed set of proposed guidelines. The paper is consistent with, but also extends, the work of the Royal Society of Canada Expert Panel on End of Life Decision Making. Un panel d��expert de la Société Royale du Canada et une Commission sp��ciale de l���Assemblée nationale du Québec ont tous les deux r��cemment recommandé que soit émises des directives permettant exercice d���un pouvoir de poursuite discrétionnaire concernant l��euthanasie et le suicide assist�� et �� l’assistance médicale pour mourir », respectivement. Il semble donc �� propos de proposer une s��rie de directives spécifiques aux offenses sur la façon dont le pouvoir de poursuite discrétionnaire dans les territoires et provinces canadiennes serait appliqué dans les cas d���euthanasie et de suicide assisté. Nous avons pris comme point de départ les seules directives de la sorte existant déjà (c���est-à-dire celle de la Colombie-Britannique et de l’Angleterre et du Pays de Galles). Par contre, compte tenu de certaines de nos réserves concernant ces directives, nous avons ensuite ��tabli les grandes lignes d’une approche permettant de mettre sur pied des directives pour les juridictions canadiennes, qui d��bute par l���identification de trois principes de base qui sont selon nous appropriées �� cette fin (respect de l��autonomie, besoin pour une grande qualit�� de prise de prise de décision du poursuivant et la confiance du public envers cette prise de décision) pour se terminer par une série de directives concr��tes et détaillées. Le présent document est compatible avec le travail de la Société royale du Canada tout en en augmentant la port��e.