963 resultados para Affirmative action programs


Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

National Highway Safety Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

National Highway Safety Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

National Highway Safety Bureau, Washington, D.C.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Bibliography: leaves 16-17.

Relevância:

80.00% 80.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Despite institutional commitment to diversity initiatives (e.g., affirmative action), employees often harbour negative attitudes towards such initiatives and their beneficiaries. Dispositional variables (e.g., neo-sexism), have often been implicated in these negative reactions. We reason that more immediate group-based beliefs (e.g., subjective beliefs about the intergroup context), also shape attitudinal and behavioural reactions and that individual and group-based beliefs are rationalised through appeals to justice and fairness concerns. In this study using early career academics we examined the role of individual differences and socio-structural beliefs (about the stability, legitimacy and permeability of the intergroup situation), to feelings of relative deprivation, perceived justice and attitudes towards gender equity initiatives. Results provided support for the role of group-based beliefs and for the mediating role of justice concerns.