Targeted! Population segmentation, electronic surveillance and governing the unemployed in Australia

Targeting is increasingly used to manage people. It operates by segmenting populations and providing different levels of opportunities and services to these groups. Each group is subject to different levels of surveillance and scrutiny. This article examines the deployment of targeting in Australian social security. Three case studies of targeting are presented in Australia's management of benefit overpayment and fraud, the distribution of employment services and the application of workfare. In conceptualizing surveillance as governance, the analysis examines the rationalities, technologies and practices that make targeting thinkable, practicable and achievable. In the case studies, targeting is variously conceptualized and justified by calculative risk discourses, moral discourses of obligation and notions of welfare dependency Advanced information technologies are also seen as particularly important in giving rise to the capacity to think about and act on population segments.

Cytogenetic molecular delineation of a terminal 18q deletion suggesting neo-telomere formation

Deletion of the long arm of chromosome 18 is one of the most common segmental aneusomies compatible with life and usually involves a deletion of the terminal chromosomal region. However, the mechanisms implicated in the stabilization of terminal deletions are not well understood. In this study, we analyzed a girl with moderate mental retardation who had a cytogenetically visible terminal 18q deletion. In order to characterize the breakpoint in the terminal 18q region, we used fluorescence In situ hybridization (FISH) with bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) and pan-telomeric probes and also the array technique based on comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH). FISH with pan-telomeric probes revealed no signal in the terminal region of the deleted chromosome, indicating the absence of normal telomere repeat (TTAGGG)n sequences in 18q. We suggest that neo-telomere formation by chromosome healing was involved in the repair and stabilization of this terminal deletion. (C) 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Disciplina 1.1: O Estado contempor??neo e suas transforma????es

A disciplina teve como conte??dos: as transforma????es e tens??es do Estado contempor??neo: autonomia e permeabilidade, coer????o e coordena????o, coes??o e fragmenta????o. O debate contempor??neo acerca dos pap??is do Estado em rela????o a quest??es como: nacionalismo, globaliza????o, multiculturalismo e democracia

Disciplina 3.1: debate contempor??neo da gest??o p??blica

A disciplina teve como principais conte??dos: origens, defini????o, caracter??sticas e import??ncia da burocracia cl??ssica. As insufici??ncias do paradigma burocr??tico: problemas end??genos e ex??genos. Origens e caracter??sticas da Nova Gest??o P??blica. Resultados das reformas de gest??o p??blica: balan??o cr??tico. A Governan??a P??blica e a rediscuss??o do papel da Administra????o P??blica. Tend??ncias atuais do debate: consensos, d??vidas e dilemas

Disciplina 1.1: Estado contempor??neo e suas transforma????es

As transforma????es e tens??es do Estado contempor??neo: autonomia e permeabilidade, coer????o e coordena????o, coes??o e fragmenta????o. O debate contempor??neo acerca dos pap??is do Estado em rela????o a quest??es como: globaliza????o, democracia, conhecimento, desenvolvimento e crise

Disciplina 3.1: debate contempor??neo da gest??o p??blica

Origens, defini????o, caracter??sticas e import??ncia da burocracia cl??ssica. As insufici??ncias do paradigma burocr??tico: problemas end??genos e ex??genos. Origens e caracter??sticas da Nova Gest??o P??blica. Resultados das reformas de gest??o p??blica: balan??o cr??tico. A Governan??a P??blica e a rediscuss??o do papel da Administra????o P??blica. Tend??ncias atuais do debate: consensos, d??vidas e dilemas

As novas formas de explora????o do trabalho no capitalismo contempor??neo e as pol??ticas p??blicas de combate ?? desigualdade

O mercado de trabalho sofreu profundas transforma????es desde o come??o do capitalismo at?? o momento atual, sendo poss??vel compar??-lo a uma loteria, na qual os trabalhadores passaram a competir entre si por ascens??o profissional. Os bilhetes dessa loteria s??o os investimentos em capital humano. Nela haver??, necessariamente, vencedores e perdedores, com os primeiros apropriando-se do trabalho dos ??ltimos. Dessa realidade, surge uma nova forma de explora????o do trabalho, cujo instrumento de legitima????o ?? o capital humano, que refor??a a tend??ncia inerente do capitalismo ?? gera????o de desigualdade e coloca limita????es ?? vis??o tradicional de combate ?? desigualdade baseada na democratiza????o do capital humano. O crescimento tamb??m tem limita????es na redu????o da desigualdade, tendo em vista que a motiva????o microecon??mica que gera o crescimento macroecon??mico ?? justamente a busca pela desigualdade.