A FUNCTIONAL VARIANT OF HLA-DR1 DELINEATED BY T-LYMPHOCYTE CLONE REACTIVITY, PROTEIN CONFORMATION, AND GENOMIC RESTRICTION SITES

This research characterized a serologically indistinguishable form of HLA-DR1 that: (1) cannot stimulate some DR1-restricted or specific T-lymphocyte clones; (2) displays an unusual electrophoretic pattern on two dimensional gels; and (3) is marked by a polymorphic restriction site of the alpha gene. Inefficient stimulation of some DR1-restricted clones was a property of DR1$\sp{+}$ cells that shared HLA-B14 on the same haplotype and/or were carriers of 21-hydroxylase (21-OH) deficiency. Nonclassical 21-OH deficiency frequently demonstrates genetic linkage with HLA-B14;DR1 haplotypes and associates with duplications of C4B and one 21-OH gene. Cells having both stimulatory (DR1$\sb{\rm n}$) and nonstimulatory (DR1$\sb{\rm x}$) parental haplotypes did not mediate proliferation of these clones. However, heterozygous DR1$\sb{\rm x}$, 2 and DR1$\sb{\rm x}$, 7 cells were efficient stimulators of DR2 and DR7 specific clones, respectively, suggesting that a trans acting factor may modify DR1 alleles or products to yield a dominant DR1$\sb{\rm x}$ phenotype. Incompetent stimulator populations did not secrete an intercellular soluble or contact dependent suppressor factor nor did they express interleukin-2 receptors competing for T-cell growth factors. Two dimensional gel analysis of anti-DR immunoprecipitates revealed, in addition to normal DR$\alpha$ and DR$\beta$ chains, a 50kD species from DR1$\sb{\rm x}$ but not from the majority of DR1$\sb{\rm n}$ or non-DR1 cells. The 50kD structure was stable under reducing conditions in SDS and urea, had antigenic homology with DR, and dissociated after boiling into 34kD and 28kD peptide chains apparently identical with DR$\alpha$ and DR$\beta$ as shown by limited digest peptide maps. N-linked glycosylation and sialation of DRgp50 appeared to be unchanged from normal DR$\alpha$ and DR$\beta$. Bg1II digestion and $DR\alpha$ probing of DR1$\sb{\rm x}$ genomic DNA revealed a 4.5kb fragment while DR1$\sb{\rm n}$ DNA yielded 3.8 and 0.76kb fragments; all restriction sites mapped to the 3$\sp\prime$ untranslated region of $DR\alpha$. Collectively, these data suggest that DRgp50 represents a novel combinatorial association between constitutive chains of DR that may interfere with or compete for normal T cell receptor recognition of DR1 as both an alloantigen and restricting element. Furthermore, extensive chromosomal abnormalities previously mapped to the class III region of B14;DR1 haplotypes may extend into the adjacent class II region with consequent intrusion on immune function. ^

Increased nuclear suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 in asthmatic bronchial epithelium suppresses rhinovirus induction of innate interferons.

BACKGROUND Rhinovirus infections are the dominant cause of asthma exacerbations, and deficient virus induction of IFN-α/β/λ in asthmatic patients is important in asthma exacerbation pathogenesis. Mechanisms causing this interferon deficiency in asthmatic patients are unknown. OBJECTIVE We sought to investigate the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) 1 in tissues from asthmatic patients and its possible role in impaired virus-induced interferon induction in these patients. METHODS We assessed SOCS1 mRNA and protein levels in vitro, bronchial biopsy specimens, and mice. The role of SOCS1 was inferred by proof-of-concept studies using overexpression with reporter genes and SOCS1-deficient mice. A nuclear role of SOCS1 was shown by using bronchial biopsy staining, overexpression of mutant SOCS1 constructs, and confocal microscopy. SOCS1 levels were also correlated with asthma-related clinical outcomes. RESULTS We report induction of SOCS1 in bronchial epithelial cells (BECs) by asthma exacerbation-related cytokines and by rhinovirus infection in vitro. We found that SOCS1 was increased in vivo in bronchial epithelium and related to asthma severity. SOCS1 expression was also increased in primary BECs from asthmatic patients ex vivo and was related to interferon deficiency and increased viral replication. In primary human epithelium, mouse lung macrophages, and SOCS1-deficient mice, SOCS1 suppressed rhinovirus induction of interferons. Suppression of virus-induced interferon levels was dependent on SOCS1 nuclear translocation but independent of proteasomal degradation of transcription factors. Nuclear SOCS1 levels were also increased in BECs from asthmatic patients. CONCLUSION We describe a novel mechanism explaining interferon deficiency in asthmatic patients through a novel nuclear function of SOCS1 and identify SOCS1 as an important therapeutic target for asthma exacerbations.

Human DMTF1β antagonizes DMTF1α regulation of the p14(ARF) tumor suppressor and promotes cellular proliferation

The human DMTF1 (DMP1) transcription factor, a DNA binding protein that interacts with cyclin D, is a positive regulator of the p14ARF (ARF) tumor suppressor. Our earlier studies have shown that three differentially spliced human DMP1 mRNAs, α, β and γ, arise from the human gene. We now show that DMP1α, β and γ isoforms differentially regulate ARF expression and promote distinct cellular functions. In contrast to DMP1α, DMP1β and γ did not activate the ARF promoter, whereas only β resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of DMP1α-induced transactivation of the ARF promoter. Ectopic expression of DMP1β reduced endogenous ARF mRNA levels in human fibroblasts. The DMP1β- and γ-isoforms share domains necessary for the inhibitory function of the β-isoform. That DMP1β may interact with DMP1α to antagonize its function was shown in DNA binding assays and in cells by the close proximity of DMP1α/β in the nucleus. Cells stably expressing DMP1β, as well as shRNA targeting all DMP1 isoforms, disrupted cellular growth arrest induced by serum deprivation or in PMA-derived macrophages in the presence or absence of cellular p53. DMP1 mRNA levels in acute myeloid leukemia samples, as compared to granulocytes, were reduced. Treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia patient samples with all-trans retinoic acid promoted differentiation to granulocytes and restored DMP1 transcripts to normal granulocyte levels. Our findings imply that DMP1α- and β-ratios are tightly regulated in hematopoietic cells and DMP1β antagonizes DMP1α transcriptional regulation of ARF resulting in the alteration of cellular control with a gain in proliferation.

The Rice Transcription Factor WRKY53 Suppresses Herbivore-Induced Defenses by Acting as a Negative Feedback Modulator of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activity

The mechanisms by which herbivore-attacked plants activate their defenses are well studied. By contrast, little is known about the regulatory mechanisms that allow them to control their defensive investment and avoid a defensive overshoot. We characterized a rice (Oryza sativa) WRKY gene, OsWRKY53, whose expression is rapidly induced upon wounding and induced in a delayed fashion upon attack by the striped stem borer (SSB) Chilo suppressalis. The transcript levels of OsWRKY53 are independent of endogenous jasmonic acid but positively regulated by the mitogen-activated protein kinases OsMPK3/OsMPK6. OsWRKY53 physically interacts with OsMPK3/OsMPK6 and suppresses their activity in vitro. By consequence, it modulates the expression of defensive, MPK-regulated WRKYs and thereby reduces jasmonic acid, jasmonoyl-isoleucine, and ethylene induction. This phytohormonal reconfiguration is associated with a reduction in trypsin protease inhibitor activity and improved SSB performance. OsWRKY53 is also shown to be a negative regulator of plant growth. Taken together, these results show that OsWRKY53 functions as a negative feedback modulator of MPK3/MPK6 and thereby acts as an early suppressor of induced defenses. OsWRKY53 therefore enables rice plants to control the magnitude of their defensive investment during early signaling.

A novel myeloid leukemia suppressor locus at human chromosome 5q13.3

Molecular mechanisms that underlie preleukemic myelodysplasia (MDS) and acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) are poorly understood. In MDS or AML with a refractory clinical course, more than 30% of patients have acquired interstitial or complete deletions of chromosome 5. The 5q13.3 chromosomal segment is commonly lost as the result of 5q deletion. Reciprocal and unbalanced translocations of 5q13.3 can also occur as sole anomalies associated with refractory AML or MDS. This study addresses the hypothesis that a critical gene at 5q13.3 functions either as a classical tumor suppressor or as a chromosomal translocation partner and contributes to leukemogenesis. ^ Previous studies from our laboratory delineated a critical region of loss to a 2.5–3.0Mb interval at 5q13.3 between microsatellite markers D5S672 and GATA-P18104. The critical region of loss was later resolved to an interval of approximately 2Mb between the markers D5S672 and D5S2029. I, then generated a long range physical map of yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) and developed novel sequence tagged sites (STS). To enhance the resolution of this map, bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) were used to construct a triply linked contig across a 1 Mb interval. These BACs were used as probes for fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) on an AML cell line to define the 5q13.3 critical region. A 200kb BAC, 484a9, spans the translocation breakpoint in this cell line. A novel gene, SSDP2 (single stranded DNA binding protein), is disrupted at the breakpoint because its first four exons are encoded within 140kb of BAC 484a9. This finding suggests that SSDP2 is the critical gene at 5q13.3. ^ In addition, I made an observation that deletions of chromosome 5q13 co-segregate with loss of the chromosome 17p. In some cases the deletions result from unbalanced translocations between 5q13 and 17p13. It was confirmed that the TP53 gene is deleted in patients with 17p loss, and the remaining allele harbors somatic mutation. Thus, the genetic basis for the aggressive clinical course in AML and MDS may be caused by functional cooperation between deletion or disruption of the 5q13.3 critical gene and inactivation of TP53. ^

Signal transduction of CEACAM1-L tumor suppressor

CEACAM1-L is an adhesion molecule that suppress the growth of prostate, breast, colon and endometrial tumors. In this study we defined the domain involved in CEACAM1-L tumor suppression activity. DU145 prostate cancer cells were infected with recombinant adenoviruses containing various CEACAM1-L mutant genes, and the effects of the mutant proteins on the growth of DU145 cells were assessed in a nude-mice xenograft model. We found that expression of the CEACAM1-L cytoplasm domain alone led to growth suppression of DU145 cells. These results suggest that the cytoplasmic domain of CEACAM1-L is necessary and sufficient for its growth-suppressive function. ^ The cytoplasmic domain of CEACAM1-L is presumed to be involved in a signaling pathway resulting in the suppression of tumor cell growth. It was not clear whether post-translational modification of CEACAM1-L is required for tumor suppressor function, therefore the importance of phosphorylation in growth-inhibitory signaling pathway was investigated. Full-length CEACAM1-L was found to be phosphorylated in vivo in both tyrosine and serine residues. Mutation of tyrosine 488 to phenylalanine did not abolish the tumor-suppressive activity of CEACAM1-L while mutation of serine 503 to alanine abolished the growth-inhibitory activity. In addition, mutation of serine 503 to aspartic acid produced tumor-suppressive activity similar to that of the wild-type CEACAM1-L. These results suggested that only phosphorylation at serine 503 is essential for CEACAM1-L's growth-inhibitory function in vivo. ^ Phosphorylation of CEACAM1-L may lead to its interaction with molecules in CEACAM1-L's signaling pathway. In the last part of this study we demonstrate that CEACAM1 is able to interact with the adapter protein p66Shc. p66Shc was found to be co-immunoprecipitated with full length CEACAM1-L but not with CEACAM1-L lacking its cytoplasmic tail. Additionally this interaction occurred in the absence of the tyrosine phosphorylation of CEACAM1-L. These results suggest that p66Shc is able to interact with the cytoplasmic domain of CEACAM1-L and this interaction does not require tyrosine phosphorylation. ^ In conclusion, this study suggests that CEACAM1-L signals tumor suppression through its cytoplasmic domain by initially becoming phosphorylated on serine 503. Additionally, the interaction with p66Shc may be involved in CEACAM1-L's signaling pathway. ^

The role of functional tumor suppressor 15-lipoxygenase 2 (15-LOX2) in normal human prostate epithelial cells and prostate cancer development

15-Lipoxygenase 2 (15-LOX2) is a recently cloned human lipoxygenase that shows tissue-restricted expression in prostate, lung, skin, and cornea. The protein level and enzymatic activity of 15-LOX2 have been shown to be down-regulated in prostate cancers compared with normal and benign prostate tissues. We report the cloning and functional characterization of 15-LOX2 and its three splice variants (termed 15-LOX2sv-a, 15-LOX2sv-b, and 15-LOX2sv-c) from primary prostate epithelial (NHP) cells. Western blotting with multiple NHP cell strains and prostate cancer (PCa) cell lines reveals that the expression of 15-LOX2 is lost in all PCa cell lines, accompanied by decreased enzymatic activity. 15-LOX2 is expressed at multiple subcellular locations, including cytoplasm, cytoskeleton, cell-cell border, and nucleus. Surprisingly, the three splice variants of 15-LOX2 are mostly excluded from the nucleus. To elucidate the relationship between nuclear localization, enzymatic activity, and tumor suppressive functions, we established PCa cell clones stably expressing 15-LOX2 or 15-LOX2sv-b. The 15-LOX2 clones express 15-LOX2 in the nuclei and possess robust enzymatic activity, whereas 15-LOX2sv-b clones show neither nuclear protein localization nor arachidonic acid-metabolizing activity. Interestingly, both 15-LOX2- and 15-LOX2sv-b-stable clones proliferate much slower in vitro when compared with control clones. When orthotopically implanted in nude mouse prostate, both 15-LOX2 and 15-LOX2sv-b suppress PC3 tumor growth in vivo. Finally, cultured NHP cells lose the expression of putative stem/progenitor cell markers, slow down in proliferation, and enter senescence. Several pieces of evidence implicate 15-LOX2 plays a role in replicative senescence of NHP cells: (1) promoter activity and the mRNA and protein levels of 15-LOX2 and its splice variants are upregulated in serially passaged NHP cells, which precede replicative senescence and occur in a cell-autonomous manner; (2) PCa cells stably expressing 15-LOX2 or 15-LOX2sv-b show a passage-related senescence-like phenotype; (3) enforced expression of 15-LOX2 or 15-LOX2sv-b in young NHP cells induce partial cell-cycle arrest and senescence-like phenotypes. Together, these results suggest that 15-LOX2 suppress prostate tumor development and do not necessarily depend on arachidonic acid-metabolizing activity and nuclear localization. Also, 15-LOX2 may serve as an endogenous prostate senescence gene and its tumor-suppressing functions might be associated with its ability to induce cell senescence. ^

Emerging roles for the double strand break repair protein 53BP1 in transcriptional regulation

Disruption of the mechanisms that regulate cell-cycle checkpoints, DNA repair, and apoptosis results in genomic instability and often leads to the development of cancer. In response to double stranded breaks (DSBs) as induced by ionizing radiation (IR), generated during DNA replication, or through immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) rearrangements in T and B cells of lymphoid origin, the protein kinases ATM and ATR are central players that activate signaling pathways leading to DSB repair. p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) participates in the repair of DNA double stranded breaks (DSBs) where it is recruited to or near sites of DNA damage. In addition to its well established role in DSB repair, multiple lines of evidence implicate 53BP1 in transcription which stem from its initial discovery as a p53 binding protein in a yeast two-hybrid screen. However, the mechanisms behind the role of 53BP1 in these processes are not well understood. ^ 53BP1 possesses several motifs that are likely important for its role in DSB repair including two BRCA1 C-terminal repeats, tandem Tudor domains, and a variety of phosphorylation sites. In addition to these motifs, we identified a glycine and arginine rich region (GAR) upstream of the Tudor domains, a sequence that is oftentimes serves as a site for protein arginine methylation. The focus of this project was to characterize the methylation of 53BP1 and to evaluate how methylation influenced the role of 53BP1 as a tumor suppressor. ^ Using a variety of biochemical techniques, we demonstrated that 53BP1 is methylated by the PRMT1 methyltransferase in vivo. Moreover, GAR methylation occurs on arginine residues in an asymmetric manner. We further show that sequences upstream of the Tudor domains that do not include the GAR stretch are sufficient for 53BP1 oligomerization in vivo. While investigating the role of arginine methylation in 53BP1 function, we discovered that 53BP1 associates with proteins of the general transcription apparatus as well as to other factors implicated in coordinating transcription with chromatin function. Collectively, these data support a role for 53BP1 in regulating transcription and provide insight into the possible mechanisms by which this occurs. ^

Transcriptional regulation of lung tumor suppressor GPRC5A in malignant and normal cells

Chronic exposure of the airways to cigarette smoke induces inflammatory response and genomic instability that play important roles in lung cancer development. Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), the major intracellular mediator of inflammatory signals, is frequently activated in preneoplastic and malignant lung lesions. ^ Previously, we had shown that a lung tumor suppressor GPRC5A is frequently repressed in human non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) cells and lung tumor specimens. Recently, other groups have shown that human GPRC5A transcript levels are higher in bronchial samples of former than of current smokers. These results suggested that smoking represses GPRC5A expression and thus promotes the occurrence of lung cancer. We hypothesized that cigarette smoking or associated inflammatory response repressed GPRC5A expression through NF-κB signaling. ^ To determine the effect of inflammation, we examined GPRC5A protein expression in several lung cell lines following by TNF-α treatment. TNF-α significantly suppressed GPRC5A expression in normal small airway epithelial cells (SAEC) as well as in Calu-1 cells. Real-time PCR analysis indicated that TNF-α inhibits GPRC5A expression at the transcriptional level. NF-κB, the major downstream effectors of TNF-α signaling, mediates TNF-α-induced repression of GPRC5A because over-expression of NF-κB suppressed GPRC5A. To determine the region in the GPRC5A promoter through which NF-κB acts, we examined the ability of TNF-α to inhibit a series of reporter constructs with different deletions of GPRC5A promoter. The luciferase assay showed that the potential NF-κB binding sites containing region are irresponsible for TNF-α-induced suppression. Further analysis using constructs with different deletions in p65 revealed that NF-κB-mediated repression of GPRC5A is transcription-independent. Co-immunoprecipitation assays revealed that NF-κB could form a complex with RAR/RXR heterodimer. Moreover, the inhibitory effect of NF-κB has been found to be proportional to NF-κB/RAR ratio in luciferase assay. Finally, Chromatin IP demonstrated that NF-κB/p65 bound to GPRC5A promoter as well as RAR/RXR and suppressed transcription. Taken together, we propose that inflammation-induced NF-κB activation disrupts the RA signaling and suppresses GPRC5A expression and thus contributes to the oncogenesis of lung cancer. Our studies shed new light on the pathogenesis of lung cancer and potentially provide novel interventions for preventing and treating this disease. ^

Regulation of estrogen receptor alpha by the tumor suppressor p53 in breast cancer cells

Estrogen receptor (ER) and the tumor suppressor p53 are key prognostic indicators in breast cancer. Estrogen signaling through its receptor (ER) controls proliferation of normal as well as transformed mammary epithelial cells, and the presence of ER is established as a marker of good prognosis and response to therapy. The p53 tumor suppressor gene is often referred to as the "cellular gatekeeper" due to its extensive control of cell proliferation and apoptosis. Loss of functional p53 is a negative prognostic indicator and is correlated with lack of response to antiestrogens, reduced disease-free interval and increased chance of disease recurrence. Clinical studies have demonstrated that tumors with mutated p53 tend to be ER negative, while ER positive tumors tend to have wild type p53. ^ Recent studies from our lab indicate that p53 genotype correlates with estrogen receptor expression in mammary tumors in vivo. We therefore hypothesized that p53 regulates ER expression in mammary cancer cells by recruitment of specific cofactors to the ER promoter. To test this, MCF-7 cells were treated with doxorubicin or ionizing radiation, both of which stimulated significant increases in p53 expression, as expected, but also increased ER expression in a p53-dependent manner. Furthermore, in cells treated with siRNA targeting p53, both p53 and ER protein levels were significantly reduced. P53 was also demonstrated to transcriptionally regulate the ER promoter in luciferase assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that p53 was recruited to the ER promoter along with CARM1, CBP, c-Jun and Sp1 and that this multifactor complex was formed in a p53-dependent manner. The regulation of ER by p53 has therapeutic implications, as the treatment of breast cancer cells with doxorubicin sensitized these cells to tamoxifen treatment. Furthermore, response to tamoxifen as well as to estrogen was dependent on p53 expression in ER positive human breast cancer cells. Taken together, these data demonstrate that p53 regulates ER expression through transcriptional control of the ER promoter, accounting for their concordant expression in human breast cancer and identifying potentially beneficial therapeutic strategies for the treatment of ER positive breast cancers. ^

The p53 tumor suppressor pathway in culture and {\it in vivo\/}

p53 functions as a tumor suppressor through its ability to initiate either growth arrest or apoptosis in cells which have sustained DNA damage. p53 elicits these cellular phenotypes through its biochemical function as a transcriptional activator. By inducing the expression of a battery of target genes, p53 is able to prevent the propagation of cells with damaged DNA. However, the genes transcriptionally induced by p53 which have been identified to date do not fully explain p53 function. p53 has been demonstrated to activate genes involved in cell cycle inhibition, apoptosis and cell proliferation. The reasons for simultaneous activation of p53 targets with disparate, opposing functions are not clear, but may be due to the use of transformed cell lines in previous experiments. In the studies presented in this thesis, the pathway of p53 tumor suppression has been studied in detail in two systems chosen for their relevance to the natural cell environment. One utilizes a normal, unaltered cultured cell system; the other the whole mouse. In order to better understand the role of the known p53 targets in effecting p53 function in normal cells, early rat embryo fibroblasts were irradiated with ultraviolet light to induce DNA damage. It was discovered that p53 protein levels increased in response to irradiation. The known targets of p53, namely, $p21\sp{WAF1/CIP1},\ mdm2,\ cyclin\ G,$ and bax, were shown for the first time to have a differential temporal induction. The growth suppressor $p21\sp{WAF1/CIP1}$ was induced first, followed by cyclin G then mdm2, which is involved in proliferation through its inactivation of p53, and finally, the apoptosis promoter, bax. These findings indicated that p53 activates its target genes in a manner to allow maximum effectiveness of target function. The rat embryo fibroblasts were shown to undergo apoptosis 24 h after irradiation. Additionally, investigation of these cells for cell cycle alterations demonstrated a brief arrest in G1. In the second study, thymocytes from mice with wild type p53 were shown to undergo apoptosis and activate p53 target genes upon ionizing radiation treatment, while thymocytes from mice deficient in p53 could not. The p53 target genes mdm2 and fas were tested in vivo for their ability to mediate p53-regulated apoptosis, and were found dispensible for that cellular function. Therefore, the p53 targets identified to date do not fully explain the ability of p53 to function as a tumor suppressor. Potentially, functional redundancy between the known targets would account for the data seen in these experiments. Additionally, identification of additional target genes should add further understanding of the p53 pathway of tumor suppression. ^

The functional role of the tumor suppressor MMAC /PTEN in glioblastoma multiforme and prostate cancer

Investigations into the molecular basis of glioblastoma multiforme led to the identification of a putative tumor suppressor gene, MMAC/ PTEN. Initial studies implicated MMAC/PTEN in many different tumor types, and identified a protein phosphatase motif in its sequence. This project aimed to identify the biological and biochemical functions of MMAC/PTEN by transiently expressing the gene in cancer cells that lack a functional gene product. ^ Expression of MMAC/PTEN mildly suppressed the growth of U251 human glioma cells and abrogated the growth advantage mediated by overexpression of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Immunoblotting demonstrated that MMAC/PTEN expression did not affect the phosphorylation of the EGFR itself, or the intermediates of several downstream signaling pathways. However, MMAC/PTEN expression significantly reduced the phosphorylation and catalytic activity of the proto-oncogene Akt/PKB. While Akt/PKB regulates the survival of many cell types, expression of MMAC/PTEN did not induce apoptosis in adherent U251 cells. Instead, MMAC/PTEN expression sensitized the cells to apoptosis when maintained in suspension (anoikis). As the survival of suspended cells is one of the hallmarks leading to metastasis, MMAC/PTEN expression was examined in a system in which metastasis is more clinically relevant, prostate cancer. ^ Expression of MMAC/PTEN in both LNCaP and PC3-P human prostate cancer cells specifically inhibited Akt/PKB phosphorylation. MMAC/PTEN expression in LNCaP cells resulted in a profound inhibition of growth that was significantly greater than that achieved with expression of p53. Expression of MMAC/PTEN in PC3-P cells resulted in greater growth inhibition than was observed in U251 glioma cells, but less than was observed in LNCaP cells, or upon p53 expression. To determine if MMAC/PTEN could function as a tumor suppressor in vivo, the effects of MMAC/PTEN expression on PC3-P cells implanted orthotopically in nude mice were examined. The ex-vivo expression of MMAC/PTEN did not decrease tumor incidence, but it did significantly decrease tumor size and metastasis. In-vivo expression of MMAC/PTEN in pre-established PC3-P tumors did not significantly inhibit tumor incidence or size, but did inhibit metastasis formation. ^ These studies demonstrate that MMAC/PTEN is a novel and important tumor suppressor gene, which functions to downregulate an important cell survival signaling pathway. ^

PML tumor suppressor potentiates cell death through inhibition of the NF -kappa B survival pathway

The promyelocytic leukemia protein PML is a growth suppressor essential for induction of apoptosis by diverse apoptotic stimuli. The mechanism by which PML regulates cell death remains unclear. In this study we found that ectopic expression of PML potentiates cell death in the TNFα-resistant tumor line U2OS and significantly sensitized these cells to apoptosis induced by TNFα in a p53-independent manner. Our study demonstrated that both PML and PML/TNFα-induced cell death are associated with DNA fragmentation, activation of caspase-3, -7, -8, and degradation of DFF/ICAD. Furthermore, we found that PML-induced and PML/TNFα-induced cell death could be blocked by the caspase-8 inhibitors crmA and c-FLIP, but not by Bcl-2, the inhibitor of mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathway. These findings indicate that this cell death event is initiated through the death receptor-dependent apoptosis pathway. Our study further showed that PML recruits NF-kappa B (NF-κB) to the PML nuclear body, blocks NF-κB binding to its cognate enhancer, and represses its transactivation function with the C-terminal region. Therefore PML inhibits the NF-κB survival pathway. Overexpression of NF-κB rescued cell death induced by PML and PML/TNFκ. These results imply that PML is a functional repressor of NF-κB. This notion was further supported by the finding that the PML−/− mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) are more resistant than the wild-type MEFs to TNFκ-induced apoptosis. In conclusion, our studies convincingly demonstrated that PML potentiates cell death through inhibition of the NF-κB survival pathway. Activation of NF-κB frequently occurs during oncogenesis. Our study here suggests that a loss of PML function enhances the NF-κB survival pathway and this event may contribute to tumorigenesis. ^

Function of GCIP (CCNDBP1), a helix -loop -helix leucine -zip protein, in cell differentiation and tumorigenesis

Cell growth and differentiation are complex and well-organized processes in which cells respond to stimuli from the environment by carrying out genetic programs. Transcription factors with helix-loop-helix (HLH) motif play critical roles in controlling the expression of genes involved in lineage commitment, cell fate determination, proliferation and tumorigenesis. This study has examined the roles of GCIP (CCNDBP1) in cell differentiation and tumorigenesis. GCIP is a recently identified HLH-leucine zipper protein without a basic region like the Id family of proteins. However, GCIP shares little sequence homology with the Id proteins and has domains with high acidic amino acids and leucine-rich regions following the HLH domain like c-Myc. Here we firstly demonstrate that GCIP is a transcription regulator related to muscle differentiation program. Overexpression of GCIP in C2C12 cells not only promotes myotube formation but also upregulates myogenic differentiation biomarkers, including MHC and myogenein. On the other hand, our finding also suggests that GCIP is a potential tumor suppressor related to cell cycle control. Expression of GCIP was significantly down-regulated in colon tumors as compared to normal colon tissues. Overexpression of GCIP in SW480 colon cancer cell line resulted in a significant inhibition on tumor cell colony formation on soft agar assays while silencing of GCIP expression by siRNA can promote cell proliferation and colony formation. In addition, results from transgenic mice specifically expressing GCIP in liver also support the idea that GCIP is involved in the early stage of hepatocarcinogenesis and decreased susceptibility to chemical hepatocarcinogenesis. ^

DRC1, DNA replication and checkpoint protein 1, functions with DPB11 to control DNA replication and the S-phase checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In addition to DNA polymerase complexes, DNA replication requires the coordinate action of a series of proteins, including regulators Cdc28/Clb and Dbf4/Cdc7 kinases, Orcs, Mcms, Cdc6, Cdc45, and Dpb11. Of these, Dpb11, an essential BRCT repeat protein, has remained particularly enigmatic. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe homolog of DPB11, cut5, has been implicated in the DNA replication checkpoint as has the POL2 gene with which DPB11 genetically interacts. Here we describe a gene, DRC1, isolated as a dosage suppressor of dpb11–1. DRC1 is an essential cell cycle-regulated gene required for DNA replication. We show that both Dpb11 and Drc1 are required for the S-phase checkpoint, including the proper activation of the Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and replication blocks. Dpb11 is the second BRCT-repeat protein shown to control Rad53 function, possibly indicating a general function for this class of proteins. DRC1 and DPB11 show synthetic lethality and reciprocal dosage suppression. The Drc1 and Dpb11 proteins physically associate and function together to coordinate DNA replication and the cell cycle.