A ‘right to have rights’ in the EU public sphere? An Arendtian justification for the application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights

This paper discusses the Court’s reasoning in interpreting the EU Charter, using recent case law on horizontal effect as a case study. It identifies two possible means of interpreting the provisions of the Charter: firstly, an approach based on common values (e.g. equality or solidarity) and, secondly, an approach based on access to the public sphere. It argues in favour of the latter. Whereas an approach based on common values is more consonant with the development of the case law so far, it is conceptually problematic: it involves subjective assessments of the importance and degree of ‘sharedness’ of the value in question, which can undermine the equal constitutional status of different Charter provisions. Furthermore, it marginalises the Charter’s overall politically constructional character, which distinguishes it from other sources of rights protection listed in Art 6 TEU. The paper argues that, as the Charter’s provisions concretise the notion of political status in the EU, they have a primarily constitutional, rather than ethical, basis. Interpreting the Charter based on the very commitment to a process of sharing, drawing on Hannah Arendt’s idea of the ‘right to have rights’ (a right to access a political community on equal terms), is therefore preferable. This approach retains the pluralistic, post-national fabric of the EU polity, as it accommodates multiple narratives about its underlying values, while also having an inclusionary impact on previously underrepresented groups (e.g. non-market-active citizens or the sans-papiers) by recognising their equal political disposition.

On the Origin of the Right to Copy: Charting the Movement of Copyright Law in Eighteenth Century Britain (1695-1775)

Taking as its point of departure the lapse of the 1662 Licensing Act in 1695, this book examines the lead up to the passage of the Statute of Anne 1710 and charts the movement of copyright law throughout the eighteenth century, culminating in the House of Lords decision in Donaldson v Becket (1774). The established reading of copyright's development throughout this period, from the 1710 Act to the pronouncement in Donaldson, is that it was transformed from a publisher's right to an author's right; that is, legislation initially designed to regulate the marketplace of the bookseller and publisher evolved into an instrument that functioned to recognise the proprietary inevitability of an author's intellectual labour. The historical narrative which unfolds within this book presents a challenge to that accepted orthodoxy. The traditional analysis of the development of copyright in eighteenth-century Britain is revealed to exhibit the character of long-standing myth, and the centrality of the modern proprietary author as the raison d'etre of the modern copyright regime is displaced.

Measuring children’s experience of their right to participate in school and community: a rights-based approach

This paper discusses the development of a children’s rights-based measure of participation and the findings from its use in a survey of 10 to 11 year old children (n= 3773). The measure, which was developed in collaboration with a group of children, had a high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .89). Findings suggest that children’s positive experience of their participation rights is higher in school than in community, and higher for girls compared to boys. It is argued that involving children in the ‘measurement’ of their own lives has the potential to generate more authentic data on children’s lived experiences.

Your Right to Get Information About Returning to the Community, September 7, 2010

You have the right to learn if you can live in the community and get the services and support you need. Includes some information and guidance.

No right to sext? A critical examination of media and legal debates about teenage girls' sexual agency in the digital age

Advances in digital photography and distribution technologies enable many people to produce and distribute images of their sex acts. When teenagers do this, the photos and videos they create can be legally classified as child pornography since the law makes no exception for youth who create sexually explicit images of themselves. The dominant discussions about teenage girls producing sexually explicit media (including sexting) are profoundly unproductive: (1) they blame teenage girls for creating private images that another person later maliciously distributed and (2) they fail to respect—or even discuss—teenagers’ rights to freedom of expression. Cell phones and the internet make producing and distributing images extremely easy, which provide widely accessible venues for both consensual sexual expression between partners and for sexual harassment. Dominant understandings view sexting as a troubling teenage trend created through the combination of camera phones and adolescent hormones and impulsivity, but this view often conflates consensual sexting between partners with the malicious distribution of a person’s private image as essentially equivalent behaviors. In this project, I ask: What is the role of assumptions about teen girls’ sexual agency in these problematic understandings of sexting that blame victims and deny teenagers’ rights? In contrast to the popular media panic about online predators and the familiar accusation that youth are wasting their leisure time by using digital media, some people champion the internet as a democratic space that offers young people the opportunity to explore identities and develop social and communication skills. Yet, when teen girls’ sexuality enters this conversation, all this debate and discussion narrows to a problematic consensus. The optimists about adolescents and technology fall silent, and the argument that media production is inherently empowering for girls does not seem to apply to a girl who produces a sexually explicit image of herself. Instead, feminist, popular, and legal commentaries assert that she is necessarily a victim: of a “sexualized” mass media, pressure from her male peers, digital technology, her brain structures or hormones, or her own low self-esteem and misplaced desire for attention. Why and how are teenage girls’ sexual choices produced as evidence of their failure or success in achieving Western liberal ideals of self-esteem, resistance, and agency? Since mass media and policy reactions to sexting have so far been overwhelmingly sexist and counter-productive, it is crucial to interrogate the concepts and assumptions that characterize mainstream understandings of sexting. I argue that the common sense that is co-produced by law and mass media underlies the problematic legal and policy responses to sexting. Analyzing a range of nonfiction texts including newspaper articles, talk shows, press releases, public service announcements, websites, legislative debates, and legal documents, I investigate gendered, racialized, age-based, and technologically determinist common sense assumptions about teenage girls’ sexual agency. I examine the consensus and continuities that exist between news, nonfiction mass media, policy, institutions, and law, and describe the limits of their debates. I find that this early 21st century post-feminist girl-power moment not only demands that girls live up to gendered sexual ideals but also insists that actively choosing to follow these norms is the only way to exercise sexual agency. This is the first study to date examining the relationship of conventional wisdom about digital media and teenage girls’ sexuality to both policy and mass media.

Re-assessing the 'public's right to know' - the shift from journalism to political PR

Tthe right to effective judicial protection and disability: the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities

On 13 December 2006, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). It is the first comprehensive human rights treaty of the 21st century. The Convention is intended as a human rights instrument with an explicit, social development dimension. It adopts a broad categorization of persons with disabilities and reaffirms that all persons with all types of disabilities must enjoy all human rights and fundamental freedoms. Precisely, the Convention marks a 'paradigm shift' in attitudes and approaches to persons with disabilities The Convention contains two articles directly connected with judicial effective protection, one more than the other, but on the other hand, one cannot be understood without the other. Both articles are Article 12 –Equal recognition before the law- and Article 13 –access to justice- As a scholar in Procedural Law, my contribution to the International Scientific Congress on Private Law of the Philippines and Spain aims to enshrine the relevant importance of the both provisions that guarantee effective judicial protection for persons with disabilities in order to analyze, subsequently, the implementation of them in Spanish legislation

Effect of Zeolite Spreading Frequency on Litter Base to Housing Quality of Broiler

The research was aimed to investigate the application of zeolite spreading frequency in related to control housing quality.  In this study, three aspects of quality were observed namely housing temperature, litter temperature and litter humidity.  The result indicated that spreading frequency was only significant effective in controlling litter humidity.  Treatment of P3 significantly (P<0.05) reduced humidity level of litter base from 42.83% (P0) to 31.18%. (Animal Production 7(2): 81-88 (2005) Key Words: Quality, Broiler, Zeolite, Spreading, Litter

ACCESS TO CULTURE: PLAY OF POWERS BETWEEN THE RIGHT TO AND THE RIGHT OF PROPERTY

In this text, under the perspective of Discourse Analysis (DA) grounded in Michel Pêcheux, we examine the way in which the phrase “access to culture” works and triggers effects of meaning in the process of reshaping the Copyright Law (LDA) nº 9.610 from February, 1998. We initially discuss the relation between the notion of culture and the sphere of Copyright Laws. We then analyze two discursive sequences from the primer Consulta Pública para Modernização da Lei de Direito Autoral produced by the Ministry of Culture (MinC). Our aim is to guide through the reshaping of the law. In order to support analysis, throughout the text, were also mobilized some theoretical notions such as archive, phrase, formulation, discursive formation and subject position. The theoretic-analytical gesture allowed us to understand that the effects of meaning produced - through the operation of the phrase "access to culture" - result from the materialization of a play of powers, nourished by new technologies, between protection (rights of property) and access (right to property).

Direito à moradia, políticas públicas em habitação e o enfrentamento do déficit habitacional: os desafios do Programa Minha Casa, Minha Vida

A presente dissertação tem por objetivo a análise do Programa Minha Casa, Minha Vida no sentido de verificar se o mesmo é passível de ser aplicado em municípios com características diversas, tornando-se um instrumento útil para esses entes federativos, combatendo o déficit habitacional urbano. Inicialmente, é desenvolvida uma abordagem sobre a moradia e o reconhecido direito a esta, que tem residência nas ideias de direitos fundamentais e direitos humanos, buscando definir sua utilização como instrumento para alcançar um status de dignidade humana. A questão do déficit habitacional, de longa data como objeto de políticas públicas em habitação no país, é também abordada, coligindo-se a teoria do direito à moradia com a realidade do referido déficit, utilizando-se como exemplo histórico a cidade do Rio de Janeiro e procurando abordar o porquê da dificuldade em solucionar a questão da moradia para a população de baixa renda, abordando também a natureza da propriedade imobiliária e a influência do setor imobiliário. Continua-se com a abordagem do programa em bases teórica e técnica, descendo-se após a alguma análise de sua legislação, sem esquecer das bases legislativas e programáticas que o antecederam e com ele relacionados. O trabalho finaliza com três estudos de caso nos Municípios de Silva Jardim, Petrópolis e Rio de Janeiro, onde, pelos dados coligidos, verifica-se que nem todos conseguem a contento implementar o programa em seu território, mormente para a faixa de menor renda, bem como que o programa não deixa de sofrer a influência do setor imobiliário, influência esta que pode acabar determinando para onde a cidade crescerá. Também se verifica que a efetiva atuação do poder público municipal é imprescindível para que o programa se torne um instrumento útil no território da cidade.

A regularização fundiária de imóveis urbanos através da legitimação da posse com a utilização de parcerias com o setor privado para fins de acesso à moradia.

O papel do Estado ao longo do Historia foi bem diversificado, ora com um caráter interventor, e ora com uma postura de regular o mínimo necessário. Esta última postura, proporcionou grandes déficit no setor de infraestrutura, desequilíbrios sociais, favelização, loteamentos irregulares e a não efetivação do direito à moradia. Deste modo, o Estado precisou ampliar a sua atuação na regularização do solo, visando uma regularização fundiária plena que incluiria desde a instalação da urbanização e infraestrutura adequada à concessão de títulos reconhecendo a posse e/ou propriedade do indivíduo. Suprir a carência de infraestrutura, urbanização e organização do solo que se acumularam nas últimas décadas, esbarra na falência fiscal do Estado Brasileiro, que precisa tomar para si a responsabilidade da regularização, mas, principalmente buscar parcerias com o setor privado. A atuação das organizações sociais, das organizações da sociedade civil de interesse público e as parcerias público-privadas precisam ser ampliadas na efetivação da regularização fundiária. Necessário se faz que o investimento não seja exclusivamente público, possibilitando conceder ao parceiro privado, através da utilização de certos instrumentos jurídicos do próprio Estatuto da Cidade como uma contraprestação interessante a este parceiro. Somente vivenciando uma interpretação e aplicação conjunta dos instrumentos jurídicos à disposição do Estado aliado a vontade política, que poderá ser garantido o desenvolvimento prometido à população brasileira e a efetivação do direito constitucional à moradia.

Autonomia e tutela da posse urbana funcionalizada em face da propriedade urbana não funcionalizada

O escopo deste trabalho é analisar e discutir questões relacionadas com conflitos urbanos que contrapõem posse e propriedade no Brasil. Na realidade social deste país, é comum que pessoas que não têm um lugar para morar ocupem terras que não são utilizadas por seu proprietário. Frequentemente, estes casos são levados ao Poder Judiciário e o juiz tem o desafio de decidir quem será tutelado. No sistema jurídico brasileiro, os princípios constitucionais dão unidade ao ordenamento. Assim, o direito à moradia, a dignidade da pessoa humana e o princípio da função social da propriedade devem ser considerados em todas as decisões relativas a estes temas. Então, quando há um conflito entre posse e propriedade em áreas urbanas, é relevante considerar se tanto a pessoa que é proprietária do imóvel quanto a pessoa que o possui estão agindo de acordo com o ordenamento jurídico. Embora o direito de propriedade seja protegido pela lei, o proprietário tem que observar os deveres que decorrem do princípio da função social da propriedade. Se ele os descumprir, não deverá ser protegido, já que está agindo em desacordo com o ordenamento jurídico. De outro lado, a pessoa que tem a posse da terra, sem ser sua proprietária, pode ser protegida se esta ocupação satisfaz necessidades e direitos fundamentais seus. Sua posse tem, neste caso, uma função social. O Poder Legislativo editou leis que protegem o possuidor contra o proprietário se a terra não é utilizada de acordo com o princípio da função social da propriedade. Entretanto, ainda que um caso específico não seja previsto em lei, é possível proteger o possuidor contra o proprietário se o imóvel não é usado de acordo com o princípio da função social e se o possuidor a utiliza para promover sua dignidade e seus direitos fundamentais.