Ministeri Johannes Virolainen 6/1 1975

Kirje 6.1.1975

Salakuljetusta vai pyhien avustamista?

Aarno Lahtinen

Helsingin äitikirkko

Pentti Lempiäinen

Evaluation Of "Safe" Trabeculectomy Versus "Safe" Phacotrabeculectomy

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of "safe" trabeculectomy (ST) versus "safe" phacotrabeculectomy (SPT).Methods: This study included 72 eyes with medically uncontrolled chronic glaucoma who underwent fornix based trabeculectomy with adjustable/releasable sutures and intraoperative mitomycin C ± phacoemulsification. 36 eyes underwent SPT and 36 eyes had ST. There was no difference between groups for age, intraocular pressure (IOP), diagnosis and gender. Subconjunctival antimetabolite injections and bleb needlings were administered according to bleb vascularity and IOP trends. Main outcome measures were: success rate (definition: IOP≤21mmHg and 20% IOP reduction); number of antimetabolite injections; bleb needlings; glaucoma medications and complications.Results: Mean age (SPT vs ST) was 72.7±12.1 years vs 72.3±12.9 years; p=0.44. Mean preoperative IOP was 24.5±8.8 mmHg vs 24.3±8.2 mmHg; p=0.46. Postoperative IOP was 13.1±4.5mmHg vs 12.4±3.2; p=0.24. Ninety percent of both groups required at least one suture removal. There was no statistically significant difference in success rate between groups, 80% vs 83%; number of eyes requiring antimetabolite injections was 22 eyes (mean 3.2 per eye) vs 23 eyes (mean 2.6 per eye, p=0.24); bleb needlings was performed in 16 eyes (mean 2.5 per eye) vs in 11 eyes (mean 2.0 per eye, p=0.15). The number of eyes restarting glaucoma medications was 5 vs 4. Minor complications were infrequent in both groups, 9 vs 10 eyes.Conclusions: The success and complications rates were similar between groups. The number of postoperative interventions required was slightly greater in the SPT group (not statistically significant). SPT is a safe procedure for patients with coexistent glaucoma and cataract and produces similar IOP-lowering to safe trabeculectomy.

Elävää kirkkohistoriaa Lohtajan rovastin kynästä

Pentti Virrankoski

Morgagnian cataract simulating iris neoplasia : case report

Purpose: to describe a case in which the diagnosis of Morganian cataract required clinical and instrumental differentiation from iris pathologies, including iris melanoma. Methods: a 60-years-old Caucasian man referred to our institute for worsening of vision in last few months. Clinical evaluation consisted in complete ophthalmological assessment, ultrasound examination (biomicroscopy and 20MHz), and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) completed with Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (SWI). Results: traumatic corneal wound of the left eye (LE) had occurred 5 years before, and was treated with medical therapy alone. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 3/10 in the right eye (RE) and finger count in the LE, with intraocular pressure at 13 and 20mmHg, respectively. Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy, accounted for the low visual acuity of the RE. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy of the LE was as in Figure 1; LE fundus was not clinically observable. Despite MRI was compatible with an iris solid formation, characterized by contrast enhancement and hyperintense signal in SWI, ultrasound indicated rather a mixed solid and liquid content (moderately echogenic external layer, hyporeflective internal content). Iris root and ciliary body were not significantly altered; the lens showed inhomogeneous content. We considered Morgagnian cataract the most probable diagnosis. Surgery confirmed the presence of a hypermature cataract with prior anterior capsule fissuring; the liquefied cortex infiltrated the iris without anterior chamber seeping. Post-operative BCVA was 3/10 and fundus examination disclosed an advanced macular chronic central serous chorioretinopathy. Conclusions: In the reported case a previous perforating trauma have probably damaged the lens capsule and started cataract progression. Curiously cataract developed percolating into the iris stroma, thus simulating an iris mass. At our knowledge, Morgagnian cataract has never been included in the differential diagnosis of iris mass.

Jalkaset eivät olekaan Hännisiä : oliko Tuomas Sianjalka edes sukua Kauppi Hänniselle?

Pentti J. Voipio

First international workshop for small animal arthroscopy : matkakertomus

Jarmo Rintasalo, Pentti Tapio