Effects of Antiseptic Solutions Commonly Used in Dentistry on Bone Viability, Bone Morphology, and Release of Growth Factors

PURPOSE Antiseptic solutions are commonly used in dentistry for a number of sterilization procedures, including harvesting of bone chips, irrigation of extraction sockets, and sterilization of osteonecrotic bone. Despite its widespread use, little information is available regarding the effects of various antiseptic solutions on bone cell viability, morphology, and the release of growth factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS The antiseptic solutions included 1) 0.5% povidone iodine (PI), 2) 0.2% chlorhexidine diguluconate (CHX), 3) 1% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and 4) 0.25% sodium hypochlorite (HYP). Bone samples collected from porcine mandibular cortical bone were rinsed in the antiseptic solutions for 10 minutes and assessed for cell viability using an MTS assay and protein release of transforming growth factor (TGF-β1), bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin (IL)-1β, and receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at 15 minutes and 4 hours after rinsing. RESULTS After antiseptic rinsing, changes to the surface protein content showed marked alterations, with an abundant protein layer remaining on CHX-rinsed bone samples. The amount of surface protein content gradually decreased in the following order: CHX, H2O2, PI, and HYP. A similar trend was also observed for the relative cell viability from within bone samples after rinsing, with up to 6 times more viable cells found in the CHX-rinsed bone samples than in the HYP- and PI-rinsed samples. An analysis of the growth factors found that both HYP and PI had significantly lower VEGF and TGF-β1 protein release from bone samples at 15 minutes and 4 hours after rinsing compared with CHX and H2O2. A similar trend was observed for RANKL and IL-1β protein release, although no change was observed for BMP2. CONCLUSIONS The results from the present study have demonstrated that antiseptic solutions present with very different effects on bone samples after 10 minutes of rinsing. Rinsing with CHX maintained significantly higher cell viability and protein release of growth factors potent to the bone remodeling cycle.

Comparative release of growth factors from PRP, PRF, and advanced-PRF

OBJECTIVES The use of platelet concentrates has gained increasing awareness in recent years for regenerative procedures in modern dentistry. The aim of the present study was to compare growth factor release over time from platelet-rich plasma (PRP), platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and a modernized protocol for PRF, advanced-PRF (A-PRF). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighteen blood samples were collected from six donors (3 samples each for PRP, PRF, and A-PRF). Following preparation, samples were incubated in a plate shaker and assessed for growth factor release at 15 min, 60 min, 8 h, 1 day, 3 days, and 10 days. Thereafter, growth factor release of PDGF-AA, PDGF-AB, PDGF-BB, TGFB1, VEGF, EGF, and IGF was quantified using ELISA. RESULTS The highest reported growth factor released from platelet concentrates was PDGF-AA followed by PDGF-BB, TGFB1, VEGF, and PDGF-AB. In general, following 15-60 min incubation, PRP released significantly higher growth factors when compared to PRF and A-PRF. At later time points up to 10 days, it was routinely found that A-PRF released the highest total growth factors. Furthermore, A-PRF released significantly higher total protein accumulated over a 10-day period when compared to PRP or PRF. CONCLUSION The results from the present study indicate that the various platelet concentrates have quite different release kinetics. The advantage of PRP is the release of significantly higher proteins at earlier time points whereas PRF displayed a continual and steady release of growth factors over a 10-day period. Furthermore, in general, it was observed that the new formulation of PRF (A-PRF) released significantly higher total quantities of growth factors when compared to traditional PRF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE Based on these findings, PRP can be recommended for fast delivery of growth factors whereas A-PRF is better-suited for long-term release.

Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 9 (rhBMP9) Induced Osteoblastic Behaviour on a Collagen Membrane Compared With rhBMP2

BACKGROUND Bone morphogenetic protein 9 (BMP9) has previously been characterized as one of the most osteogenic growth factors of the BMP-family, however, up until now, these experiments have only been demonstrated using adenovirus-transfection experiments (gene therapy). With the recent development of recombinant human (rh)BMP9, the aim of the present study was to investigate its osteopromotive potential versus rhBMP2 when loaded onto a collagen membrane. METHODS ST2 stromal bone marrow cells were seeded onto 1)control; 2)rhBMP2-low(10ng/ml); 3)rhBMP2-high(100ng/ml); 4)rhBMP9-low(10ng/ml); and 5)rhBMP9-high(100ng/ml) porcine collagen membranes. Groups were then compared for cell adhesion at 8 hours, cell proliferation at 1, 3 and 5 days real-time PCR at 3 and 14 days for genes encoding Runx2, alkaline phosphatase(ALP) and bone sialoprotein(BSP) at 3 and 14 days and alizarin red staining at 14 days. RESULTS While rhBMP2 and rhBMP9 demonstrated little effects on cell attachment and proliferation, pronounced increases were observed on osteoblast differentiation. It was found that all groups significantly induced ALP mRNA levels at 3 days and BSP levels at 14 days, however rhBMP9-high demonstrated significantly higher values when compared to all other groups for ALP levels (5-fold increase at 3 days and 2-fold increase at 14 days). Alizarin red staining further revealed that both concentrations of rhBMP9 induced up to 3-fold more staining when compared to rhBMP2. CONCLUSION These results indicate that the combination of collagen membranes with rhBMP9 significantly induced significantly higher ALP mRNA expression and alizarin red staining when compared to rhBMP2. These findings suggest that rhBMP9 may be a suitable growth factor for future regenerative procedures in bone biology.

RNA-Activated Protein Kinase, PKR

The double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) activated protein kinase, PKR, is one of the several enzymes induced by interferons and a key molecule mediating the antiviral effects of interferons. PKR contain an N-terminal, double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD), which has two tandem copies of the motifs (dsRBM I and dsRBM II). Upon binding to viral dsRNA, PKR is activated via autophosphorylation. Activated PKR has several substrates; one of the examples is eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2a). The phosphorylation of eIF2a leads to the termination of cell growth by inhibiting protein synthesis in response to viral infection. The objective of this project was to characterize the dsRBM I and define the dsRNA binding using biophysical methods. First, the dsRBM I gene was cloned from a pET-28b to a pET-11a expression plasmid. N-terminal poly-histidine tags on pET-28b are for affinity purification; however, these tags can alter the structure and function of proteins, thus the gene of dsRBM I was transferred into the plasmid without tags (pET-11a) and expressed as a native protein. The dsRBM I was transformed into and expressed by Rosetta DE3plyS expression cells. Purification was done by FPLC using a Sepharose IEX ion exchange followed by Heparin affinity column; yielding pure protein was assayed by PAGE. Analytical Ultracentrifugation, Sedimentation Velocity, was used to characterize free solution association state and hydrodynamic properties of the protein. The slight decrease in S-value with concentration is due to the hydrodynamic non-ideality. No self association was observed. The obtained molecule weight was 10,079 Da. The calculated sedimentation constant at zero concentration at 20°C in water was 1.23 and its friction coefficient was 3.575 ´ 10-8. The frictional ratio of sphere and dsRBM I became 1.30. Therefore, dsRBM I must be non-globular and more asymmetric shape. Isolated dsRBM I exhibits the same tertiary fold as compared to context in the full domain but it exhibited weaker binding affinity than full domain to a 20 bp dsRNA. However, when the conditions allowed for its saturation, dsRBM I to 20 bp dsRNA has similar stoichiometry as full dsRBD.