Practical management of sunitinib toxicities in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are infrequent malignancies which manifest in both functional (hormone-secreting) and more commonly non-functional (non-secreting) forms. The oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus are approved as targeted therapies for patients with well-differentiated, non-resectable disease and evidence of disease progression. The recent approval of sunitinib for the management of advanced pNET is based on a continuous daily dosing (CDD) schedule that differs from the intermittent 4weeks on/2weeks off (4/2) schedule approved for sunitinib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Therefore, although clinicians may be familiar with therapy management approaches for sunitinib in advanced RCC and GIST, there is less available experience for the management of patients with a CDD schedule. Here, we discuss the similarities and differences in the treatment of pNET with sunitinib compared with advanced RCC and GIST. In particular, we focus on the occurrence and management of sunitinib-related toxicity in patients with pNET by drawing on experience in these other malignancies. We aim to provide a relevant and useful guide for clinicians treating patients with pNET covering the management of events such as fatigue, mucositis, hand-foot syndrome, and hypertension.

Bosentan and/or Sildenafil for non-operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Objectives: To evaluate outcome of patients treated "off-label" by bosentan and/or sildenafil for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Patients and methods: Since 2003, 18 patients (mean age 69 ± 11 years) have been treated with bosentan and/or sildenafil for CTEPH (mean pulmonary arterial resistance 8.1 ± 3.7 U Wood) in Lausanne University Hospital, with a follow-up of at least 12 months. Sixteen of them were inoperable because of distal disease and/or age or significant co-morbidities and 2 had persistent or recurrent pulmonary hypertension despite surgery. Efficacy of treatment was evaluated by comparison of New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA), six-minute walk test (6-MWT) and serum levels of N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP) at baseline (T0) and at 12 months (T12). Wilcoxon rank test was used for statistics. Results: At T0, median NYHA class was III (range II-IV), 6-MWT was 348 meters (5 and 95 centiles:0, 539) and NT pro-BNP was 387 mmol/l (58, 3508). At T12, 11 patients were treated with bosentan, 5 with sildenafil, 1 with inhaled Iloprost (because of failure of the two other treatments) and 1 with a combination of sildenafil and Iloprost. NYHA had improved in 10 patients, remained stable in 7 and worsened in 1 (median decrease 0.5 (-2; 0.2) p = 0.013). Six-MWT improved by a median of 15 meters (-142, +270) (p = 0.047) and NT pro-BNP decreased by a median of 65 mmol/l (-2988, +187) (p = n.s.). Among the 10 patients with a follow-up of 2 years or longer, two thirds remained stable and one third had worsened at 24 month. Treatments were well tolerated and only one patient had significant side effects (cutaneous reaction to bosentan) necessitating a switch to another treatment. Conclusion: In agreement with published data, bosentan and sildenafil improved functional status (NYHA, 6-MWT) and haemodynamics (NT pro BNP) in our patients with inoperable CTEPH. However these medications should not be used as substitute for surgery when the latter is applicable.

Genetic dissection of sodium and potassium transport along the aldosterone-sensitive distal nephron: Importance in the control of blood pressure and hypertension.

In this review, we discuss genetic evidence supporting Guyton's hypothesis stating that blood pressure control is critically depending on fluid handling by the kidney. The review is focused on the genetic dissection of sodium and potassium transport in the distal nephron and the collecting duct that are the most important sites for the control of sodium and potassium balance by aldosterone and angiotensin II. Thanks to the study of Mendelian forms of hypertension and their corresponding transgenic mouse models, three main classes of diuretic receptors (furosemide, thiazide, amiloride) and the main components of the aldosterone- and angiotensin-dependent signaling pathways were molecularly identified over the past 20years. This will allow to design rational strategies for the treatment of hypertension and for the development of the next generation of diuretics.

Relation between atherogenic dyslipidemia and the Adult Treatment Program-III definition of metabolic syndrome (Genetic Epidemiology of Metabolic Syndrome Project).

Genetic Epidemiology of Metabolic Syndrome is a multinational, family-based study to explore the genetic basis of the metabolic syndrome. Atherogenic dyslipidemia (defined as low plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol with elevated triglycerides (<25th and >75th percentile for age, gender, and country, respectively) identified affected subjects for the metabolic syndrome. This report examines the frequency at which atherogenic dyslipidemia predicts the metabolic syndrome of the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP-III). One thousand four hundred thirty-six (854 men/582 women) affected patients by our criteria were compared with 1,672 (737 men/935 women) unaffected persons. Affected patients had more hypertension, obesity, and hyperglycemia, and they met a higher number of ATP-III criteria (3.2 +/- 1.1 SD vs 1.3 +/- 1.1 SD, p <0.001). Overall, 76% of affected persons also qualified for the ATP-III definition (Cohen's kappa 0.61, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.64), similar to a separate group of 464 sporadic, unrelated cases (75%). Concordance increased from 41% to 82% and 88% for ages < or =35, 36 to 55, and > or =55 years, respectively. Affected status was also independently associated with waist circumference (p <0.001) and fasting glucose (p <0.001) but not systolic blood pressure (p = 0.43). Thus, the lipid-based criteria used to define affection status in this study substantially parallels the ATP-III definition of metabolic syndrome in subjects aged >35 years. In subjects aged <35 years, atherogenic dyslipidemia frequently occurs in the absence of other metabolic syndrome risk factors.

Traiter l'hypertension artérielle: l'incertitude des définitions et des cibles [Managing hypertension: the uncertainty of definitions and targets].

In clinical practice, physicians are confronted with a multitude of definitions and treatment goals for arterial hypertension, depending of the diagnostic method used (e.g. office, home and ambulatory blood pressure measurement) and the underlying disease. The historical background and evidence of these different blood pressure thresholds are discussed in this article, as well as some recent treatment guidelines. Besides, the debate of the "J curve", namely the possible risks associated with an excessive blood pressure reduction, is discussed.

Public health value of fixed-dose combinations in hypertension.

It is well documented that reducing blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive individuals reduces the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. Despite this, many patients with hypertension remain untreated or inadequately treated, and fail to reach the recommended BP goals. Suboptimal BP control, whilst arising from multiple causes, is often due to poor patient compliance and/or persistence, and results in a significant health and economic burden on society. The use of fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) for the treatment of hypertension has the potential to increase patient compliance and persistence. When compared with antihypertensive monotherapies, FDCs may also offer equivalent or better efficacy, and the same or improved tolerability. As a result, FDCs have the potential to reduce both the CV event rates and the non-drug healthcare costs associated with hypertension. When FDCs are adopted for the treatment of hypertension, issues relating to copayment, formulary restrictions and therapeutic reference pricing must be addressed.

Monitoring compliance in resistant hypertension: an important step in patient management.

Poor compliance with antihypertensive drug regimens is one recognized cause of inadequate blood pressure control. Compliance is difficult to measure, so poor adherence to treatment remains largely undiagnosed in clinical practice. When the therapeutic response to a drug is not the one expected, it is a major challenge for many physicians to decide whether the patient is a non-responder or a non-complier. Poor compliance is therefore often incorrectly interpreted as a lack of response to treatment. Not detecting non-compliance can lead to the wrong measures being taken. Electronic monitoring of compliance provides important longitudinal information about drug-intake behaviour that cannot be obtained in the clinic. Such monitoring can improve both compliance and blood pressure control, and help physicians to make more rational therapeutic decisions. A reliable assessment of compliance could have a great impact on medical costs by preventing unnecessary investigations or dose adaptations in patients who are not taking their drugs adequately, or potentially reducing the number of hospitalizations. Side-effects and lack of effectiveness are two frequent causes of poor compliance. The right choice of antihypertensive drug can therefore contribute to compliance. In this respect, it is important to find a drug regimen that is effective, long-acting and well tolerated. Long-acting antihypertensive drugs that provide good blood pressure control beyond the 24-h dosing period should perhaps be considered as drugs of choice in non-compliant patients with hypertension because they help to prevent the consequences of occasional drug omissions.

Hypertension and microvascular remodelling

In the present review, microvascular remodelling refers to alterations in the structure of resistance vessels contributing to elevated systemic vascular resistance in hypertension. We start with some historical aspects, underscoring the importance of Folkow's contribution made half a century ago. We then move to some basic concepts on the biomechanics of blood vessels, and explicit the definitions proposed by Mulvany for specific forms of remodelling, especially inward eutrophic and inward hypertrophic. The available evidence for the existence of remodelled resistance vessels in hypertension comes next, with relatively more weight given to human, in comparison with animal data. Mechanisms are discussed. The impact of antihypertensive drug treatment on remodelling is described, again with emphasis on human data. Some details are given on the three studies to date which point to remodelling of subcutaneous resistance arteries as an independent predictor of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. We terminate by considering the potential role of remodelling in the pathogenesis of end-organ damage and in the perpetuation of hypertension.

Behandlung des akuten Hirninfarktes [Treatment of acute stroke -- an overview]

This paper provides an overview on the actual state of acute therapy in patients with ischemic stroke. The discussion focusses on intravenous and intraarterial thrombolysis, antithrombotic therapy, and the treatment of medical and neurological complications, and therapy recommendations are presented. Finally ongoing studies, particularly those concerning thrombolysis with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers and ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis, are presented.

The Swiss registry for pulmonary arterial hypertension: the paediatric experience.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. Epidemiological data are scarce, particularly in the paediatric population. A registry was recently developed in order to collect epidemiological data on patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in Switzerland. This is the first description of the paediatric data. Paediatric patients aged 0-18 years with the diagnosis of PAH were enrolled in the registry from 1999 to 2005 with informed consent from their parents. Patient characteristics, PAH aetiology, functional capacity, exercise capacity, treatments and outcome were among the most important data collected. A total of 23 patients (12 male, 11 female) have been thus far included in the registry. Median age at time of diagnosis was 3 years (range 1 month-18 years) and median follow-up was 3.47 years (range 1 day-12.6 years). PAH aetiologies are diagnosed as idiopathic in 8/23 patients (34.8%) and associated with congenital heart diseases in 12/23 (52.2%) or with pulmonary diseases in 3/23 patients (13.0%). Death occurred in 1 patient before treatment was initiated. Single treatments include medications with a calcium channel blocker in 2/23 patients, with bosentan in 10/23, and with inhaled iloprost in 1/23. Combined therapies include bosentan and inhaled iloprost in 7/23 patients, bosentan and sildenafil in 2/23 patients, and bosentan, sildenafil and inhaled iloprost in 2/23 patients. Additional oral anticoagulation is given to 14/23 patients and 8/23 patients are on oxygen therapy. NYHA class at baseline visit was obtained in 22/23 patients (4 NYHA 2, 17 NYHA 3 and 1 NYHA 4). Changes in NYHA class were observed over a 2-year period in 3/22 patients who improved from NYHA 3 to NYHA 2. Initial improvement of 6-minute walk distance was observed in 6/13 patients with a sustained improvement in 4. These preliminary results provide information on the epidemiology of PAH in children in Switzerland and demonstrate that most paediatric patients show stabilisation of the disease under new treatments. This underscores the utility of registries for rare diseases in providing crucial information in the era of new therapies. It may also help to improve the future medical approach.

Upregulation of vasopressin V1A receptor mRNA and protein in vascular smooth muscle cells following cyclosporin A treatment.

1. The major side effects of the immunosuppressive drug cyclosporin A (CsA) are hypertension and nephrotoxicity. It is likely that both are caused by local vasoconstriction. 2. We have shown previously that 20 h treatment of rat vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) with therapeutically relevant CsA concentrations increased the cellular response to [Arg8]vasopressin (AVP) by increasing about 2 fold the number of vasopressin receptors. 3. Displacement experiments using a specific antagonist of the vasopressin V1A receptor (V1AR) showed that the vasopressin binding sites present in VSMC were exclusively receptors of the V1A subtype. 4. Receptor internalization studies revealed that CsA (10(-6) M) did not significantly alter AVP receptor trafficking. 5. V1AR mRNA was increased by CsA, as measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Time-course studies indicated that the increase in mRNA preceded cell surface expression of the receptor, as measured by hormone binding. 6. A direct effect of CsA on the V1AR promoter was investigated using VSMC transfected with a V1AR promoter-luciferase reporter construct. Surprisingly, CsA did not increase, but rather slightly reduced V1AR promoter activity. This effect was independent of the cyclophilin-calcineurin pathway. 7. Measurement of V1AR mRNA decay in the presence of the transcription inhibitor actinomycin D revealed that CsA increased the half-life of V1AR mRNA about 2 fold. 8. In conclusion, CsA increased the response of VSMC to AVP by upregulating V1AR expression through stabilization of its mRNA. This could be a key mechanism in enhanced vascular responsiveness induced by CsA, causing both hypertension and, via renal vasoconstriction, reduced glomerular filtration.

Concomitant calcium entry blockade and inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system: a rational and effective means for treating hypertension

Pharmacological treatment of hypertension is effective in preventing cardiovascular and renal complications. Calcium antagonists (CAs) and blockers of the renin-angiotensin system [angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II antagonists (ARBs)] are widely used today to initiate antihypertensive treatment but, when given as monotherapy, do not suffice in most patients to normalise blood pressure (BP). Combining a CA and either an ACE-inhibitor or an ARB considerably increases the antihypertensive efficacy, but not at the expense of a deterioration of tolerability. Several fixed-dose combinations are available (CA + ACE-inhibitors: amlodipine + benazepril, felodipine + ramipril, verapamil + trandolapril; CA + ARB: amlodipine + valsartan). They are expected not only to improve BP control, but also to facilitate long-term adherence with antihypertensive therapy, thereby providing maximal protection against the cardiovascular and renal damage caused by high BP.

Managing hypertension in high-risk patients: lessons and promises from the STRATHE and ADVANCE trials.

Pharmacological treatment of hypertension represents a cost-effective way of preventing cardiovascular and renal complications. To benefit maximally from antihypertensive treatment, blood pressure should be brought to below 140/90 mmHg in every hypertensive patient, and even lower (< 130/80 mmHg) if diabetes or renal disease co-exists. Such targets cannot usually be reached using monotherapies. This is especially true in patients who present with a high cardiovascular risk. The co-administration of two agents acting by different mechanisms considerably increases the blood pressure control rate. Such combinations are not only efficacious, but are also well tolerated, and some fixed low-dose combinations even have a placebo-like tolerability. This is the case for the preparation containing the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor perindopril (2 mg) and the diuretic indapamide (0.625 mg), a fixed low-dose combination that has been shown in controlled trials to be more effective than monotherapies in reducing albuminuria, regressing cardiac hypertrophy and improving the stiffness of large arteries. Using this combination to initiate antihypertensive therapy has been shown in a double-blind trial (Strategies of Treatment in Hypertension: Evaluation; STRATHE) to normalize blood pressure (< 140/90 mmHg) in significantly more patients (62%) than a sequential monotherapy approach based on atenolol, losartan and amlodipine (49%) and a stepped-care strategy based on valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (47%), with no difference between the three arm groups in terms of tolerability. An ongoing randomized trial (Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Release Controlled Evaluation; ADVANCE) is a study with a 2 x 2 factorial design assessing the effects of the fixed-dose perindopril-indapamide combination and of the intensive gliclazide modified release-based glucose control regimen in type 2 diabetic patients, with or without hypertension. A total of 11 140 patients were randomly selected. Within the first 6 weeks of treatment (run-in phase), the perindopril-indapamide combination lowered blood pressure from 145/81 +/- 22/11 mmHg (mean +/- SD) to 137/78 +/- 20/10 mmHg. Fixed-dose combinations are becoming more and more popular for the management of hypertension, and are even proposed by hypertension guidelines as a first-line option to treat hypertensive patients.

Calcium antagonists as first-line therapy in hypertension: results of the Swiss Isradipine Study. Swiss Hypertension Society

In this study of the efficacy and safety of isradipine as first-line therapy in hypertension, 1,647 patients enrolled; 1,472 completed the 4-week placebo run-in period and began treatment with isradipine at 2.5 mg twice daily for 4 weeks. During placebo, 11% (n = 175) of the 1,647 patients withdrew because of normalization of blood pressure, side effects, noncompliance, violation of the study protocol, side effects from concomitant therapy, or other reasons. During isradipine therapy (n = 1,376), blood pressure decreased from 168 +/- 18/102 +/- 8 mm Hg at the end of the placebo period to 155 +/- 17/94 +/- 9 mm Hg after 2 weeks (p less than 0.001) and 151 +/- 16/92 +/- 9 mm Hg after 4 weeks (p less than 0.001). During active treatment, 6.4% (n = 94) were withdrawn because of flushing, headache, edema, palpitations, gastrointestinal side effects, skin rashes, or other side effects, and two patients because of lack of efficacy. The side effect score in the remaining patients worsened for flushing, remained unchanged for edema, but significantly improved for palpitations, fatigue, dizziness, headache, and nervousness. After 4 weeks, 60% of patients had diastolic blood pressures of less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Thus, isradipine is effective and safe as first-line therapy in patients with primary hypertension as seen in general practice.

Adherence to anti-hypertensive treatment within a chronic disease management program: A longitudinal, retrospective study

Objective This study assessed pharmacological treatment adherence using the Morisky-Green Test and identified related variables. Method A longitudinal and retrospective study examined 283 patients with hypertension (62.5% women, 73.4 [10.9] years old) who were being monitored by a chronic disease management program for 17 months between 2011 and 2012. Nurses performed all the actions of the program, which consisted of advice via telephone and periodic home visits based on the risk stratification of the patients. Results A significant increase in treatment adherence (25.1% vs. 85.5%) and a decrease in blood pressure were observed (p<0.05). Patients with hypertension and chronic renal failure as well as those treated using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were the most adherent (p<0.05). Patients with hypertension who received angiotensin receptor blockers were less adherent (p<0.05). Conclusions Strategies such as nurse-performed chronic disease management can increase adherence to anti-hypertensive treatment and therefore contribute to the control of blood pressure, minimizing the morbidity profiles of patients with hypertension.