910 resultados para Fatigue of welded structures
Resumo:
It is generally accepted that globular proteins fold with a hydrophobic core and a hydrophilic exterior. Might the spatial distribution of amino acid hydrophobicity exhibit common features? The hydrophobic profile detailing this distribution from the protein interior to exterior has been examined for 30 relatively diverse structures obtained from the Protein Data Bank, for 3 proteins of the 30S ribosomal subunit, and for a simple set of 14 decoys. A second-order hydrophobic moment has provided a simple measure of the spatial variation. Shapes of the calculated spatial profiles of all native structures have been found to be comparable. Consequently, profile shapes as well as particular profile features should assist in validating predicted protein structures and in discriminating between different protein-folding pathways. The spatial profiles of the 14 decoys are clearly distinguished from the profiles of their native structures.
Resumo:
Structurally neighboring residues are categorized according to their separation in the primary sequence as proximal (1-4 positions apart) and otherwise distal, which in turn is divided into near (5-20 positions), far (21-50 positions), very far ( > 50 positions), and interchain (from different chains of the same structure). These categories describe the linear distance histogram (LDH) for three-dimensional neighboring residue types. Among the main results are the following: (i) nearest-neighbor hydrophobic residues tend to be increasingly distally separated in the linear sequence, thus most often connecting distinct secondary structure units. (ii) The LDHs of oppositely charged nearest-neighbors emphasize proximal positions with a subsidiary maximum for very far positions. (iii) Cysteine-cysteine structural interactions rarely involve proximal positions. (iv) The greatest numbers of interchain specific nearest-neighbors in protein structures are composed of oppositely charged residues. (v) The largest fraction of side-chain neighboring residues from beta-strands involves near positions, emphasizing associations between consecutive strands. (vi) Exposed residue pairs are predominantly located in proximal linear positions, while buried residue pairs principally correspond to far or very far distal positions. The results are principally invariant to protein sizes, amino acid usages, linear distance normalizations, and over- and underrepresentations among nearest-neighbor types. Interpretations and hypotheses concerning the LDHs, particularly those of hydrophobic and charged pairings, are discussed with respect to protein stability and functionality. The pronounced occurrence of oppositely charged interchain contacts is consistent with many observations on protein complexes where multichain stabilization is facilitated by electrostatic interactions.
Resumo:
After the 2010 Haiti earthquake, that hits the city of Port-au-Prince, capital city of Haiti, a multidisciplinary working group of specialists (seismologist, geologists, engineers and architects) from different Spanish Universities and also from Haiti, joined effort under the SISMO-HAITI project (financed by the Universidad Politecnica de Madrid), with an objective: Evaluation of seismic hazard and risk in Haiti and its application to the seismic design, urban planning, emergency and resource management. In this paper, as a first step for a structural damage estimation of future earthquakes in the country, a calibration of damage functions has been carried out by means of a two-stage procedure. After compiling a database with observed damage in the city after the earthquake, the exposure model (building stock) has been classified and through an iteratively two-step calibration process, a specific set of damage functions for the country has been proposed. Additionally, Next Generation Attenuation Models (NGA) and Vs30 models have been analysed to choose the most appropriate for the seismic risk estimation in the city. Finally in a next paper, these functions will be used to estimate a seismic risk scenario for a future earthquake.