826 resultados para 170113 Social and Community Psychology
Resumo:
Undergraduate psycholog)' students from stepfamilies (always one step and one biological parent) and biologically intact families (always both biological parents) participated in this study. The goal was to assess perceptions of stepfamilies (N = 106, Nstepfamilies = 44, Nbiological = 62, age range = 17.17 to 28.92 years, M = 19.46 years). One theoretical perspective, the social stigma h)'pothesis, argues that there is a stigma attached to stepfamilies, or that stepfamilies are consistentiy associated with negative stereotypes. In the current study, participants were assessed on a number of variables, including a semantic differential scale, a perceived conflict scale and a perceived general satisfaction scale. It was found that a consistently negative view of stepfamilies was prevalent. Furthermore, the negative stereotypes existed, irrespective of participant family type. Results support the theoretical view that stepfamilies are stereotypically viewed as negative, when compared to biological families.
Resumo:
The aim of this study was to further our understanding of the factors that influence the experience of jealousy in romantic relationships. More specifically, the person variables of neuroticism, gender, and attachment style were examined, together with situational determinants such as past infidelity. The research also assessed the interaction between person and situadonal determinants of jealousy, and the relative importance of the various predictors. Questionnaires were completed by 102 undergraduate psychology students and an addidonal five participants from the researcher's social network. Consistent with past research, there was a positive association between neurodcism and chronic, emodonal, and behavioural jealousy. Furthermore, there was a posidve associadon between anxious attachment and jealousy, even when neurodcism was controlled. Past experience of infidelity and attachment dimensions had interacdve effects on jealousy. Interesdngly, the reladve importance of the predictors varied across the dimensions of jealousy. The results extend research in the area of person and situadonal determinants of jealousy, and are discussed in terms of attachment theory.
Cost benefit analyses for your group and your self: The 'rationality' of decision-making in conflict
Resumo:
The current experiment focuses on the roles of social identity and social comparison in perceptions of procedural justice. Participants are randomly allocated to conditions in a 2 (whether the participant has the opportunity to voice an opinion), X 2 (whether the comparison other has the opportunity to voice an opinion), X 2 (whether the comparison other is an ingroup or an outgroup member), between subjects design. Participants are then asked to report the extent to which they perceive the procedure they are involved in to be fair. It is predicted that participants will have a strong feeling of procedural unfairness when they are not given an opportunity by the leader to voice their opinion, but learn that their comparison other is given that opportunity. It is also predicted that the feeling of unfairness should be stronger when the comparison other is an outgroup rather than an ingroup member. Additionally, participants receiving a fair treatment may regard the procedure as fair when their outgoup comparison other receives an unfair treatment. Results support these predictions and reveal that how people make judgments of procedural justice through social comparison is qualified by the social identities of the parties involved.