Moral Insanity and psychological disorder: the hybrid roots of Psychiatry

This paper traces the significance of the diagnosis of ‘moral insanity’ (and the related the diagnoses of ‘monomania’ and ‘manie sans delire’) to the development of psychiatry as a profession in the 19th century. The pioneers of psychiatric thought were motivated to explore such diagnoses because they promised public recognition in the high status surroundings of the criminal court. Some success was achieved in presenting a form of expertise that centred on the ability of the experts to detect quite subtle, ‘psychological’ forms of dangerous madness within the minds of offenders in France and more extensively in England. Significant backlash in the press against these new ideas pushed the profession away from such psychological exploration and back towards its medical roots that located criminal insanity simply within the organic constitution of its sufferers.

R. D. Laingin antipsykiatrinen kritiikki teoksessa Divided Self

Analysoin tutkimuksessani radikaalin antipsykiatrian hulluuskäsityksiä ja psykiatrian kritiikkiä osana 1960-luvun vastakulttuuria ja kulttuurista murrosta. Alkuperäislähteeni on R. D. Laingin Divided Self: An Existential Study in Sanity and Madness (1960), jossa Laing käsitteli ajatuksiaan skitsofreenikoiden kokemusmaailmasta ja psykiatrisen katseen kohdentumisesta ymmärtämiseen ja empatiaan potilassuhteessa. Hän lähestyi aihettaan eksistentialistis-fenomenologisesta näkökulmasta ja sai leiman hulluuden romantisoijana ehdottaessaan myöhemmin 1960-luvulla, että kaikki psykoottiset matkat saattoivat johtaa yksilön ”uudelleensyntymään”. 1960-luvulla erityisesti psykiatreista ja sosiologeista koostuva joukko toi esiin kriittisiä näkemyksiä mielisairaalapotilaiden oikeuksista ja hoidosta samalla kyseenalaisten sairauksien medikaalisen mielen. He kommentoivat samalla sekä psykiatrian vallan käyttöä, että länsimaisen sivilisaation tilaa. Sodan jälkeisen maailman murros eli teknologian kasvu, kaupungistuminen ja arvojen materiaalistuminen vähensivät mahdollisuutta ihmisten sosiaalisten tarpeiden tyydyttämiseen. Nämä aiheuttivat henkilökohtaisella tasolla arvojen yhteentörmäyksiä, mistä 1960-luvun vastakulttuurit, kuten antipsykiatria, saivat kasvualustaa. Laingin teos avaa yhden näkökulman 1960-luvun ajatteluun ja kulttuuriin, jossa elettiin uudenlaisten elämäntapojen etsimisen aikaa. Laingin esittämät argumentit saivat laboratorion Kingsley Hallin terapeuttisesta yhteisöstä, joka perustettiin The Philadelphia Associationin tuella Lontoon East Endiin vuonna 1965. Tarkastelen yhteisöä paikkautopiana ja vaihtoehtona mielisairaalahoidolle. Laingin teoksen ja Kingsley Hallin kokeilun kautta asetan antipsykiatrian osaksi 1960-luvun vastakulttuuristen liikkeiden kirjoa.

Saúde mental e gênero em um CAPS II de Brasília : condições sociais, sintomas, diagnósticos e sofrimento psíquico

Tese (doutorado)—Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Psicologia, Departamento de Psicologia Clínica, Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicologia Clínica e Cultura, 2016.

Arte, teatro pós-traumático e loucura : o processo criativo do chicqueiro e a lógica do pato

Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Artes, 2016.

Dançar o Godot : atmosferas do transitório e da espera

Dissertação (mestrado)—Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Artes, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Arte, 2016.

The Broken Mirror: Maternal Agency and Identity in Charles Dickens's Bleak House

This paper examined how Esther Summerson, Dickens’s ideal good mother, can be understood as a woman who has maternal agency and identity both as a character and as a narrator, and how she contrasts with other maternal characters in the novel, both major and minor. While more transgressive mothers, such as Lady Dedlock, Mrs. Jellyby and even Krook’s cat, are doomed to death, ineffectiveness and madness, Esther moves from a frozen, “unsexualized” state into a space of life and sexual possibility. In addition, Esther has agency and identity as a narrator since she shares the narration with a third-person male narrator. Esther becomes the one who speaks rather than the one who is spoken of, and her maternal, nurturing voice provides a balm for the often harsh, judgmental voice of the male narrator. As the narrator’s patriarchal voice dies away at the end, it is Esther’s maternal voice that survives.

From ‘Bad’ to ‘Mad’: Labelling and Behaviour in Peter Shaffer’s Equus

The process of ‘labelling’ (whereby labels are socially imposed on a given behaviour by a given person) is an extensive and recurrent one in our society, as proved by the labelling of behaviours and people even into the literary text. In our analysis, we will try to show how applying one of two most different labels (psychopathic or psychotic) greatly influences our understanding of the existence of ‘evil’ or moral responsibility in the deeds of a person. To such end, we will use Peter Shaffer’s play Equus (1973), which requires both the characters in the play and the spectators to decide whether Alan Strang’s terrible crime is a result of evil or of insane behaviour: whether he is ‘mad’ or simply ‘bad’. We will try to evince the current social and cultural confusion between madness and evil, and how processes of medicalization or criminalization affect our understanding of those around us and those living in the books we read.

The Ultimate Secrecy: Feminist Readings of Masculine Trauma in Vietnam War Literature

It is a widely acknowledged and often unquestioned fact that patriarchy and its modes of behaviour and social organization favour the appearance of trauma on the weakest (and defenceless) members of society: women. In the last decades, trauma seems to have taken the baton of typically female maladies such as 19th c. hysteria or 20th c. madness. Feminists in the 20th c. have long worked to prove the connection between the latter affections (and their reflection in literary texts) and patriarchal oppression or expectations of feminine behaviour and accordance to roles and rules. With Trauma Studies on the rise, the approach to the idea of the untold as related to femininity is manifold: on the one hand, is not trauma, which precludes telling about one’s own experience and keeps it locked not only from the others, but also from ourselves, the ultimate secrecy? On the other hand, when analyzing works that reflect trauma, one is astounded by the high number of them with a female protagonist and an almost all-female cast: in this sense, a ‘feminist’ reading is almost compulsory, in the sense that it is usually the author’s assumption that patriarchal systems of exploitation and expectations favour traumatic events and their outcome (silence and secrets) on the powerless, usually women. Often, traumatic texts combine feminism with other analytical discourses (one of the topics proposed for this panel): Toni Morrison’s study of traumatic responses in The Bluest Eye and Beloved cannot be untangled from her critique of slavery; just as much of Chicana feminism and its representations of rape and abuse (two main agents of trauma) analyze the nexus of patriarchy, new forms of post-colonialism, and the dynamics of power and powerlessness in ethnic contexts. Within this tradition that establishes the secrecies of trauma as an almost exclusively feminine characteristic, one is however faced with texts which have traumatized males as protagonists: curiously enough, most of these characters have suffered trauma through a typically masculine experience: that of war and its aftermath. By analyzing novels dealing with war veterans from Vietnam or the Second World War, the astounding findings are the frequent mixture of masculine or even ‘macho’ values and the denial of any kind of ‘feminine’ characteristics, combined with a very strict set of rules of power and hierarchy that clearly establish who is empowered and who is powerless. It is our argument that this replication of patriarchal modes of domination, which place the lowest ranks of the army in a ‘feminine’ situation, blended with the compulsory ‘macho’ stance soldiers are forced to adopt as army men (as seen, for example, in Philip Caputo’s Indian Country, Larry Heinemann’s Paco’s Story or Ed Dodge’s DAU: A Novel of Vietnam) furthers the onset and seriousness of ulterior trauma. In this sense, we can also analyze this kind of writing from a ‘feminist’ point of view, since the dynamics of über-patriarchal power established at the front at war-time deny any display of elements traditionally viewed as ‘feminine’ (such as grief, guilt or emotions) in soldiers. If trauma is the result of a game of patriarchal empowerment, how can feminist works, not only theoretical, but also fictional, overthrow it? Are ‘feminine’ characteristics necessary to escape trauma, even in male victims? How can feminist readings of trauma enhance our understanding of its dynamics and help produce new modes of interaction that transcend power and gender division as the basis for the organization of society?

Aportes a la revisión de literatura sobre la relación entre el arte y la psicosis desde una perspectiva psicoanalítica.

El presente trabajo tiene como propósito hacer una revisión crítica de dos de los trabajos más relevantes que abordan la relación entre salud mental y arte, a saber: Artistry of the Mentally Ill, de Hans Prinzhorn (1922/1972) y Madness and Art, de Walter Morgenthaler (1921/1992). Para ello, se presenta primero un recuento de estos textos, y en un segundo momento, su respectivo análisis. De esta manera, llevo a cabo una revisión crítica de los ya mencionados libros a la luz de diferentes teorías psicoanalíticas que abordan algunos temas cruciales dentro de esta relación, como lo son la psicosis, y desde otras perspectivas, el arte marginal y la creatividad, aportando así a la investigación teórica de este tema particular.