Plan zemelʻnogo uchastka poselka Kalininfelʻd N 17 Leninskogo fonda

Digital image

Plan zemelʻnogo uchastka poselka N 35-34 Belozerskogo fonda

Digital image

Plan zemelʻnogo uchastka 1-go Kakhovskogo meliorativnogo tovarishchestva

Digital image

Plan Ekadovskogo Kooperatvnogo Meliorativnogo tovarishchestva PUCH

Digital image

Plan zemelʻnogo uchastka Cholvaskogo kooperativnogo meliorativnogo tovarishchestva "Intensivn. N 2 Khersonskogo okruga Skadovskogo raĭona urochishch. "Kara-Bulat"

Digital image

Plan Aleshkovskogo meliorativnogo tovarishchestva

Digital image

Plan Golo-pristanskogo meliorativnogo tovarishchestva

Digital image

Plan Mikolaivskoiï okrugi Poltavskogo raĭonu , v chastke kolfondu chº 351 pid nazvoi︠u︡ Abkinsʻkiĭ

Digital image

Plan Mikolaivskoiï okrugi Poltavskogo raĭonu , v chastke kolfondu chº 351 pid nazvoi︠u︡ Abkinsʻkiĭ

Digital image

Skhematicheskiĭ plan 2-ogo agronomicheskogo uchastka, Khersonskiĭ okrug

Digital image

Plan zemelʻnogo otvoda "Poltavt︠s︡y

Digital image

NORDEK : A Plan for Increased Nordic Economic Co-operation and Integration 1968-1970

For the first time the attempt of Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden to increase Nordic economic co-operation and integration (NORDEK 1968-1970) is analysed by using records from the four governments archives and interviews with central actors participating. A dominating argument has until now been that dynamics in Nordic economic integration is different from dynamics in European integration. This archive based study disproves the myth however of ideological Nordism and of short term political developments outside Norden as most important for the NORDEK initiative. The NORDEK initiative was actually more a consequence of a long term socioeconomic and socio-political path dependant process. The study also disproves the myth that the NORDEK plan was a political and ideological symbol without socioeconomic substance. The purpose with NORDEK was to create a better basis for generating economic growth and social welfare. The proposed NORDEK institutions were therefore developed to promote economic progress. The study finally shows that the NORDEK failure in 1970 was not a result of lacking economic rationale or incompatible economic interests. The failure was a result of a power struggle in Finnish domestic policy and lacking political will in the other Nordic countries to continue without Finland.

G20 tax reform plan should prevent another Lux leaks

The G20 Communique is good news on the international tax reform front. As part of the G20 commitment to boost economic resilience the Communique commits G20 nations to taking action to ensure fairness in the international tax system. This means they are looking at ways to ensure profits are taxed where economic activities deriving the profits are performed and where value is created.