999 resultados para Henry, O., 1862-1910
Resumo:
Samuel Taylor Coleridge.--Frederick Denison Maurice.--Thomas Erskine of Linlathen.--Life of Charles Kingsley.--Arthur Penrhyn Stanley.--The Cambridge apostles of 1830.--Richard Holt Hutton.--A study of Carlyle.--The majority.--James Fitzjames Stephen.--The moral influence of George Eliot.--John Ruskin.--Laurence Oliphant.--Count Leo Tolstoi.--Morals and politics.--Ethics and science.--Biography.--The relation of memory to will.--The vanity of men of letters.--Invalids.--Apologies.--Henry Thomas Buckle.--The unfaithful steward.--Brothers, an address to female students.--De senectute.--The drawbacks of the intellectual life.
Resumo:
On verso: Harry M. Bates, Dean of Law School
Resumo:
Top Row: George Thomson, Joe Magidsohn, Henry Wenner, Ralph Hulburt, William Edmunds, Fay Clark, ? Mitchell, Lewis Daniels, mngr. Charles Spicer
Middle Row: Arthur Cornell, Clement Quinn, Stanfield Wells, Albert Benbrook, Fred Conklin, George Lawton, Thomas Bogle
Front Row: Rufus Sipple, Victor Pattengill, Frank Pickard, Neil McMillan, Stan Borleske, Raymon Cooper
Resumo:
Report of the society for the year 1910 (3 p.) appended.
Resumo:
At head of title: Tribunal d'Arbitrage constitué en exécution du protocole signé à Londres le 13 octobre 1904.
Resumo:
Mainly manuscript sources; appendix, "A list of materials for our history which have hitherto been printed": v. 1, pt. 2, p. [677]-918.
Resumo:
Narrative of service in the 2d and 24th Regiments, New York Cavalry.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Australia’s Future Tax System Review, headed by the then head of the Australian Treasury, and the Productivity Commission’s Research Report on the not for profit sector, both examined the state of tax concessions to Australia’s not for profit sector in the light of the High Court’s decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Word Investments Ltd. Despite being unable to quantify with any certainty the pre- or post-Word Investments cost of the tax concessions, both Reports indicated their support for continuation of the income tax exemption. However, the government acted in the 2011 Budget to target the not for profit income tax concessions more precisely, mainly on competitive neutrality grounds. This article examines the income tax exemption by applying the five taxation design principles, proposed in the Australia’s Future Tax System Review, for assessing tax expenditure. The conclusion is that the exemptions can be justified and, further, that a rationale for the exemption can be consistent with the reasoning in the Word Investments case.